Strategies to Reduce the Probability of a Misleading Signal

Chapter
Part of the Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control book series (FSQC)

Abstract

Standard practice in statistical process control (SPC) is to run two individual charts, one for the process mean and another one for the process variance. The resulting scheme is known as a simultaneous scheme and it provides a way to satisfy Shewhart’s dictum that proper process control implies monitoring both location and dispersion.When we use a simultaneous scheme, the quality characteristic is deemed to be out-of-control whenever a signal is triggered by either individual chart. As a consequence, the misidentification of the parameter that has changed can occur, meaning that a shift in the process mean can be misinterpreted as a shift in the process variance and vice versa. These two events are known as misleading signals (MS) and can occur quite frequently.We discuss (necessary and) sufficient conditions to achieve values of probabilities of misleading signals (PMS) smaller than or equal to 0.5, explore, for instance, alternative simultaneous Shewhart-type schemes and check if they lead to PMS which are smaller than the ones of the popular $$(\bar{X},\,S^{2})$$ simultaneous scheme.

Keywords

Misleading signals Simultaneous schemes Statistical process control

References

1. Antunes, C. (2009). Avaliação do impacto da correlação em sinais Erróneos de esquemas Conjuntos para o valor esperado e variância (Assessment of the impact of the correlation on misleading signals in joint Schemes for the mean and variance). Master’s thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
2. Hawkins, D. M., & Maboudou-Tchao, E. M. (2008). Multivariate exponentially weighted moving covariance matrix. Technometrics, 50, 155–166.
3. Knoth, S., Morais, M. C., Pacheco, A., & Schmid, W. (2009). Misleading signals in simultaneous residual schemes for the mean and variance of a stationary process. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 38, 2923–2943.
4. Morais, M. J. C. (2002). Stochastic ordering in the performance analysis of quality control schemes. Ph.D. thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
5. Morais, M. C., & Pacheco, A. (2000). On the performance of combined EWMA schemes for μ and σ: a Markovian approach. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 29, 153–174.Google Scholar
6. Morais, M. C., & Pacheco, A. (2006). Misleading signals in joint schemes for μ and σ. In H. J. Lenz, & P. Th. Wilrich (Eds.), Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control (Vol. 8, pp. 100–122). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
7. Nelson, L. S. (1982). Control charts. In S. Kotz, & N. L. Johnson (Eds.-in-Chief), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, (Vol. 2, pp. 176–183). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
8. Ramos, P. F., Morais, M. C., & Pacheco, A. (2013). Misleading signals in simultaneous residual schemes for the process mean and variance of AR(1) processes: a stochastic ordering approach. In J. L. Silva, F. Caeiro, I. Natário, & C. A. Braumann (Eds.), Advances in Regression, Survival Analysis, Extreme Values, Markov Processes and Other Statistical Applications (pp. 161–170). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
9. Ramos, P. F., Morais, M. C., Pacheco, A., & Schmid, W. (2012). Assessing the impact of autocorrelation in misleading signals in simultaneous residual schemes for the process mean and variance: a stochastic ordering approach. In H. J. Lenz, P. Th. Wilrich, & W. Schmid (Eds.). Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 10 (pp. 35–52). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
10. Ramos, P. F., Morais, M. C., Pacheco, A., & Schmid, W. (2013a). Stochastic ordering in the qualitative assessment of the performance of simultaneous schemes for bivariate processes. Sequential Analysis, 32, 214–229.
11. Ramos, P. F., Morais, M. C., Pacheco, A., & Schmid, W. (2013b). Misleading signals in simultaneous schemes for the mean vector and the covariance matrix of a bivariate process. In P. E. Oliveira, M. G. Temido, M. Vichi, & C. Henriques (Eds.). Recent Developments in Modeling and Applications in Statistics – Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics (pp. 225–235). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
12. Ramos, P. F., Morais, M. C., Pacheco, A., & Schmid, W. (2013c). On the misleading signals in simultaneous schemes for the mean vector and covariance matrix of multivariate i.i.d. output. (Accepted for publication in Statistical Papers; published on line in Feb. 2015).Google Scholar
13. St. John, R. C. & Bragg, D. J. (1991). Joint X-bar R charts under shift in mu or sigma. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions (pp. 547–550). Milwaukee: American Society for Quality Control.Google Scholar
14. Tang, P. F., & Barnett, N. S. (1996a). Dispersion control for multivariate processes. Australian Journal of Statistics, 38, 235–251.
15. Tang, P. F., & Barnett, N. S. (1996b). Dispersion control for multivariate processes — some comparisons. Australian Journal of Statistics, 38, 253–273.
16. Walsh, J. E. (1952). Operating characteristics for tests of the stability of a normal population. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 191–202.
17. Wieringa, J. E. (1999). Statistical Process Control for Serially Correlated Data. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Economics, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
18. Wikipedia (2012). Code of Hammurabi — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, Accessed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_hammurabi on 2012–11-21.

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

• Manuel Cabral Morais
• 1
Email author
• Patrícia Ferreira Ramos
• 2
• António Pacheco
• 1
1. 1.CEMAT & Department of MathematicsInstituto Superior TécnicoLisbonPortugal
2. 2.CEMATInstituto Superior TécnicoLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations

Citechapter 