Exploring Performative Authoring as a Story Creation Approach for Children

  • Sharon Lynn Chu
  • Francis Quek
  • Kumar Sridharamurthy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8832)

Abstract

We propose performative authoring, an approach for children to author digital animated stories using pretend play or story enactment. Using a systematic methodology, we designed and developed DiME, a prototype system to explore how children may make use of performative authoring to create stories. Findings showed that children greatly enjoyed the authoring approach, and that DiME supported the child’s imagination of characters, objects and environments during enactment. However, enactment for authoring lacked narrative structuring and the affordance for rapid iterative editing that is critical to creativity. We conclude that performative authoring has great potential to facilitate and even improve children’s storytelling.

Keywords

Storytelling Authoring Children Creativity Enactment Pretend play 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Launchpad Toys. ToonTastic: Lights, Camera, Play (2014), http://www.launchpadtoys.com/toontastic/ (cited June 8, 2014)
  2. 2.
    Fein, G.G.: Pretend play in childhood: An integrative review. Child Development, 1095–1118 (1981)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 42(1), 7–97 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M.: Creative Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pederson, D.R., Rook-Green, A., Elder, J.L.: The role of action in the development of pretend play in young children. Developmental Psychology 17(6), 756 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Widjajanto, W.A., Lund, M., Schelhowe, H.: Wayang Authoring: a web-based authoring tool for visual storytelling for children. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, pp. 464–467. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Widjajanto, W.A., Lund, M., Schelhowe, H.: Enhancing the Ability of Creative Expression and Intercultural Understanding through Visual Story. In: Spaniol, M., Li, Q., Klamma, R., Lau, R.W.H. (eds.) ICWL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5686, pp. 444–453. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barnes, C., Jacobs, D.E., Sanders, J., Goldman, D.B., Rusinkiewizsz, S., Finkelstein, A., Agrawala, M.: Video puppetry: a performative interface for cutout animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 7(5), Article 124 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Svensson, A., Björk, S., Åkesson, K.-P.: Tangible handimation real-time animation with a sequencer-based tangible interface. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Building Bridges, pp. 547–550. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eccles, J.S., The development of children ages 6 to 14. The Future of Children, 30–44 (1999) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Piaget, J.: The language and thought of the child. World, New York (1923)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press (1978)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, S.-Y.: The Effects of Storytelling and Pretend Play on Cognitive Processes, Short-Term and Long-Term Narrative Recall. Child Study Journal 29(3), 175–191 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chu, S.L., Quek, F., Tanenbaum, J.: Performative Authoring: Nurturing Storytelling in Children through Imaginative Enactment. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., C̨atak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 144–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lillard, A.S.: Pretend play skills and the child’s theory of mind. Child Development 64(2), 348–371 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zunshine, L.: Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Ohio State University Press (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirsh, D.: Projection, Problem Space and Anchoring. In: 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2310–2315. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chu, S., Quek, F.: MAIA: A Methodology for Assessing Imagination in Action. In: CHI 2013 Workshop on Evaluation Methods for Creativity Support Environments. ACM, Paris (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chu, S.L., Quek, F., Wang, Y., Hartson, R.: Finding-NEVO: Toward radical design in HCI. In: Winckler, M. (ed.) INTERACT 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8117, pp. 471–478. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Natural Point Inc. Optitrack: Body Bundles (2013), http://www.naturalpoint.com/optitrack/products/motive-body-bundles/ (cited October 14, 2013)
  21. 21.
    Read, J.C., MacFarlane, S.: Using the Fun Toolkit and Other Survey Methods to Gather Opinions in Child Computer Interaction. In: IDC 2006: International Conference for Interaction Design and Children, Tampere, Finland, pp. 81–88. ACM (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Lynn Chu
    • 1
  • Francis Quek
    • 1
  • Kumar Sridharamurthy
    • 1
  1. 1.TAMU Embodied Interaction Lab, Department of VisualizationTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations