Fleeing the Operator: The User Experience and Participation in Marble Hornets (2009-2014)

  • Devin Hartley
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8832)

Abstract

The found-footage YouTube series Marble Hornets (2009-2014) uses two YouTube channels and a Twitter account to create a transmediated Alternate Reality Game (ARG) experience, allowing users to communicate directly with both the diegetic characters and each other. While it is not revolutionary in how it approaches the use of ARG elements in its narrative, it marks a starting point in the creation of a definitive model for this mode of storytelling.

Keywords

transmedia YouTube social media participatory spectatorship ARG interactive narrative 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aardse, K.: Alternate Reality Games, Narrative Disbursement and Canon. In: Barton, K.M., Lampley, J.M. (eds.) Fan CULTure: Essays on Participatory Fandom in the 21st Century, pp. 106–117. McFarland and Company Inc., Jefferson (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burgess, J., Green, J.: Youtube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Polity, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chinchanachokchai, S., Duff, B.R.L.: Jack of All Trades, Master of…Some? Multitasking in Digital Consumers. In: Belk, R.W., Llamas, R. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Digital Consumption, pp. 367–377. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cloud Chamber, Investigate North (2014), http://cloudchambermystery.com/
  5. 5.
    Jacobs, J.: Television, Interrupted: Pollution or Aesthetic?”. In: Strange, N., Bennett, J. (eds.) Television as Digital Media, pp. 255–279. Duke University Press, Durham (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jenkins, H.: Searching for the Origami Unicorn: The Matrix and Transmedia Storytelling. In: Convergence Culture: Where Old Media and New Media Collide, pp. 95–134. New York University Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Ndalianis, A.: Transmedia and the Sensorium: From Blair Witch to True Blood. The Horror Sensorium: Media and the Senses, pp. 163–194. McFarland and Co., Jefferson (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oddey, A., White, C.: Introduction: Visions Now: Life is a Screen. In: Oddey, A., White, C. (eds.) Modes of Spectating, pp. 7–14. Intellect, Chicago (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Hara, K., Grian, H., Williams, J.: Participation, Collaboration and Spectatorship in an Alternate Reality Game. Paper presented at OZCHI 2008: Australasian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group Conference Proceedings, Cairns, QLD, Australia, December 8-12 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parmentier, M.-A., Fischer, E.: Interactive Online Audiences. In: Belk, R.W., Llamas, R. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Digital Consumption, pp. 171–181. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Royer, C., Royer, D.: The Spectacle of Isolation in Horror Films. The Hayworth Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Thacker, E.: Dark Media. Excommunication: Three Inquiries in Media and Mediation, pp. 77–149. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Devin Hartley
    • 1
  1. 1.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations