A Generative Model for Automatic Detection of Resolving Multiple Sclerosis Lesions

  • Colm Elliott
  • Douglas L. Arnold
  • D. Louis Collins
  • Tal Arbel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8677)


The appearance of new Multiple Sclerosis (MS) lesions on MRI is usually followed by subsequent partial resolution, where portions of the newly formed lesion return to isointensity. This resolution is thought to be due mostly to reabsorption of edema, but may also reflect other reparatory processes such as remyelination. Automatic identification of resolving portions of new lesions can provide a marker of repair, allow for automated analysis of MS lesion dynamics, and, when coupled with a method for detection of new MS lesions, provide a tool for precisely measuring lesion change in serial MRI. We present a method for automatic detection of resolving MS lesion voxels in serial MRI using a Bayesian framework that incorporates models for MRI intensities, MRI intensity differences across scans, lesion size, relative position of voxels within a lesion, and time since lesion onset. We couple our method with an existing method for automatic detection of new MS lesions to provide an automated framework for measuring lesion change across serial scans of the same subject. We validate our framework by comparing to lesion volume change measurements derived from expert semi-manual lesion segmentations on clinical trial data consisting of 292 scans from 73 (54 treated, 19 untreated) subjects. Our automated framework shows a) a large improvement in segmentation consistency over time and b) an increased effect size as calculated from measured change in lesion volume for treated and untreated subjects.


Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Volume Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Resolution Status Temporal Segmentation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Meier, D.S., Weiner, H.L., Guttmann, C.R.: Time-series modeling of multiple sclerosis disease activity: a promising window on disease progression and repair potential? Neurotherapeutics 4(3), 485–498 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meier, D.S., Guttmann, C.R.: MRI time series modeling of ms lesion development. Neuroimage 32(2), 531–537 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    García-Lorenzo, D., Francis, S., Narayanan, S., Arnold, D., Louis Collins, D., Louis Collins, D.: Review of automatic segmentation methods of multiple sclerosis white matter lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging. In: Medical Image Analysis (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lladó, X., Ganiler, O., Oliver, A., Martí, R., Freixenet, J., Valls, L., Vilanova, J.C., Ramió-Torrentà, L., Rovira, À.: Automated detection of multiple sclerosis lesions in serial brain MRI. Neuroradiology 54(8), 787–807 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elliott, C., Francis, S.J., Arnold, D.L., Collins, D.L., Arbel, T.: Bayesian classification of multiple sclerosis lesions in longitudinal MRI using subtraction images. In: Jiang, T., Navab, N., Pluim, J.P.W., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6362, pp. 290–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliott, C., et al.: Temporally consistent probabilistic detection of new multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI. IEEE TMI 32(8), 1490–1503 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meier, D., Weiner, H., Guttmann, C.: MR imaging intensity modeling of damage and repair in multiple sclerosis: relationship of short-term lesion recovery to progression and disability. American Journal of Neuroradiology 28(10), 1956–1963 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sled, J., Zijdenbos, A., Evans, A.: A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 17(1), 87–97 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, S.: Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping 17(3), 143–155 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins, D.L., Neelin, P., Peters, T.M., Evans, A.C.: Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized talairach space. Journal of computer assisted tomography 18(2), 192–205 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nyul, L., Udupa, J., Zhang, X.: New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 19(2), 143–150 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Francis, S.: Automatic lesion identification in MRI of multiple sclerosis patients. Master’s thesis, McGill University (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cumming, G.: Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge, New York (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colm Elliott
    • 1
  • Douglas L. Arnold
    • 3
  • D. Louis Collins
    • 2
  • Tal Arbel
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Intelligent MachinesMcGill UniversityCanada
  2. 2.Montreal Neurological InstituteMcGill UniversityCanada
  3. 3.NeuroRx ResearchMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations