Advertisement

Digital Game-Based Learning: Learning with Games

  • Katrin Becker
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Game-Based Learning book series (AGBL)

Abstract

This chapter on game-based learning and the next on game-based pedagogy form the foundation on which the remainder of the book is built.

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Social Learning Learning Theory Operant Conditioning Cognitive Load Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aldrich, C. (2009). The complete guide to simulations and serious games: How the most valuable content will be created in the age beyond Gutenberg to Google. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, F. C., & Bartlett, F. C. (1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baytak, A., & Land, S. (2011). An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(6), 765–782. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9184-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, K. (2007). Pedagogy in commercial video games. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks (pp. 21–47). Hershey, PA: Information Science Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, K. (2008). Video game pedagogy: Good games = good pedagogy. In C. T. Miller (Ed.), Games: Purpose and potential in education (pp. 73–125). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, K., & Jacobsen, D. M. (2005, June 16–20). Games for learning: Are schools ready for what’s to come? Proceedings of the DiGRA 2005 2nd International Conference, “Changing Views: Worlds in Play”, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, J., & Kwak, H. (2014). STFU NOOB!: Predicting crowdsourced decisions on toxic behavior in online games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  9. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives; the classification of educational goals (1st ed.). New York, NY: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, J. S. (1999). Learning, working & playing in the digital age. Conference on Higher Education of the American Association for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/sci_edu/seelybrown/, http://www.ntlf.com/html/sf/sf.htm.
  11. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated learning and the culture of learning. Education Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, R. (2014). Chapter One - Motivation in educational contexts: Does gender matter? In S. L. Lynn & S. B. Rebecca (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 47, pp. 1–41). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, Z.-H., & Chen, S. Y. (2013). A surrogate competition approach to enhancing game-based learning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 1–24. doi: 10.1145/2524264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clancey, W. J. (1995). A tutorial on situated learning. Proceedings of the (Taiwan) International Conference on Computers and Education, Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(1), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, R. E. (2007). Learning from serious games? Arguments, evidence, and research suggestions. Educational Technology, 47, 56–59.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smity, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. (2014). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis (Brief). March, 2014.Google Scholar
  21. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. (Technical Report No. 403). January, 1987.Google Scholar
  22. Corredor, J., Gaydos, M., & Squire, K. (2014). Seeing change in time: Video games to teach about temporal change in scientific phenomena. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 324–343. doi: 10.1007/s10956-013-9466-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  24. Cypher, M., & Richardson, I. (2006). An actor-network approach to games and virtual environments. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Game research and development.Google Scholar
  25. da Silva, F. C., & Vasconcelos, W. (2006). Rule schemata for game artificial intelligence. In J. Sichman, H. Coelho, & S. Rezende (Eds.), Advances in artificial intelligence - IBERAMIA-SBIA 2006 (pp. 21–47). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education; An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  28. Federation of American Scientists. (2006). Report on The Summit on Educational Games (pp. 53). Washington, DC: Federation of American Scientists. October 25, 2005. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/gamesummit/.
  29. Felicia, P., & Egenfeld-Nielsen, S. (2011). Game-based learning: A review of the state of the art. In S. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, B. Meyer, & B. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Serious games in education: A global perspective (pp. 21–46). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ferrara, J. (2012). Playful design: Creating game experiences in everyday interfaces. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.Google Scholar
  31. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
  32. Gagné, R. M. (1980). Learnable aspects of problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 15(2), 84–92.Google Scholar
  33. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  34. Galarneau, L. (2005). Spontaneous communities of learning: A cross-cultural ethnography and social network analysis of player-learner social networks in massively multiplayer online games. Paper presented at the DiGRA ‘2005 Changing Views: Worlds in Play, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved June 16–20, 2005, from http://www.gamesconference.org/digra2005/viewabstract.php?id=364.
  35. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (1st ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Gee, J. P. (2009). Deep learning properties of good digital games: How far can they go? In U. Ritterfeld, M. J. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 48–62). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success (Large type large print ed.). New York, NY: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  38. Hadziomerovic, A., & Biddle, R. (2006, October 10–12). Tracking engagement in a role play game. Proceedings of the Future Play, The International Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  39. Hambrick, D. Z., Altmann, E. M., Oswald, F. L., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Accounting for expert performance: The devil is in the details. Intelligence, 45, 112–114. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hannafin, M., Hill, J., Land, S., & Lee, E. (2014). Student-centered, open learning environments: Research, theory, and practice. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 641–651). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hartmann, T., Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2014). How violent video games communicate violence: A literature review and content analysis of moral disengagement factors. Communication Monographs, 81(3), 310–332. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2014.922206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirumi, A., Appelman, B., Rieber, L., & Eck, R. V. (2010). Preparing instructional designers for game-based learning: Part 1. TechTrends, 54(3), 27–37. doi: 10.1007/s11528-010-0400-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Inch, J. (2013). Perioperative simulation learning and post-registration development. British Journal of Nursing, 22(20), 1166–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. James, W. (1915). Talks to teachers on psychology and to students on some of life’s ideals. New York, NY: H. Holt.Google Scholar
  45. Jenkins, H. (2002, March 29). Game theory: How should we teach kids Newtonian physics? Simple. Play computer games. Technology Review. Retrieved June 11, 2004, from http://www.technologyreview.com/index.asp.
  46. Juul, J. (2013). The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., Roque, R., Burke, Q., & Monroy-HernÁNdez, A. (2012). Collaborative agency in youth online and offline creative production in Scratch. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 63–87.Google Scholar
  48. Kim, E., & Irwin, J. P. (2013). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students by Terrell L. Strayhorn (review). The Review of Higher Education, 37(1), 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition (Revth ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  50. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Kolb, D. A., & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group process (pp. 33–58). London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Koster, R. (2004). Theory of fun for game design. Scottsdale, AZ: Paraglyph Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  55. Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381. doi: 10.2307/40878163.Google Scholar
  56. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell/Sociological Review.Google Scholar
  58. Law, E. L.-C., & Sun, X. (2012). Evaluating user experience of adaptive digital educational games with Activity Theory. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(7), 478–497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  61. Leupold, T. (2004). Spot On: Games get political. GameSpot. Retrieved December 24, 2014, from http://www.gamespot.com/articles/spot-on-games-get-political/1100-6104371/.
  62. Lin, H.-W., & Lin, Y.-L. (2014). Digital educational game value hierarchy from a learners’ perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lindley, C. A., & Sennersten, C. C. (2008). Game play schemas: From player analysis to adaptive game mechanics. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2008, 1–7. doi: 10.1155/2008/216784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liu, C.-C., Cheng, Y.-B., & Huang, C.-W. (2011). The effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem solving. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1907–1918. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Luriëiìa, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development, its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?: The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  69. Media Literacy Project.org. What is Media Literacy? Retrieved December 17, 2014, from http://medialiteracyproject.org/learn/media-literacy.
  70. Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  71. Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori method (UPenn Digital Library http://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/montessori/method/method.html ed.). New York, NY: Schocken Books.
  72. Murphy, C. (2011). Why games work and the science of learning. Proceedings of the Interservice, Interagency Training, Simulations, and Education Conference.Google Scholar
  73. Murray, J. H. (1998). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  74. Nacke, L., & Lindley, C. A. (2008). Flow and immersion in first-person shooters: Measuring the player’s gameplay experience. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  75. Oliver, M., & Pelletier, C. (2004, July). Activity theory and learning from digital games: Implications for game design. Proceedings of the Digital Generations: Children, young people and new media, London.Google Scholar
  76. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
  77. Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  78. Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., Correa, M. N., Flores, P., et al. (2003). Beyond Nintendo: Design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40(1), 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In Instructional-design theories and models: Vol. 2, A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 161–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  81. Siang, A. C., & Radha Krishna, R. (2003, 10–12 December). Theories of learning: A computer game perspective. Proceedings of the Multimedia Software Engineering, 2003.Google Scholar
  82. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms; an experimental analysis. New York, London: D. Appleton-Century Company.Google Scholar
  83. Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  84. Stokes, B., Walden, N., Nasso, F., Mariutto, G., & Burak, A. (2015). Report #1: Impact with games — A fragmented field. Pittsburg: Carnegie-Mellon University. April 20, 2015. Retrieved from http://press.etc.cmu.edu/content/report-1-impact-games-fragmented-field.
  85. Stroustrup, B. (2010). What should we teach new software developers? Why? Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sun, C.-T., Wang, D.-Y., & Chan, H.-L. (2011). How digital scaffolds in games direct problem-solving behaviors. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2118–2125. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 3(3), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. doi: 10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Takeuchi, L. M., & Vaala, S. (2014). Level up learning: A national survey on teaching with digital games. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from http://www.gamesandlearning.org/2014/10/21/level-up-learning-captures-state-of-digital-games-in-classroom/.
  90. Taylor, N., Jenson, J., de Castell, S., & Dilouya, B. (2014). Public displays of play: Studying online games in physical settings. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 763–779. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Teach, R., & Murff, E. (2014). Learning inhibitors in business simulations and games. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 36, 191.Google Scholar
  92. Thorndike, E. L. (1910). The contribution of psychology to education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Turkay, S., Hoffman, D., Kinzer, C. K., Chantes, P., & Vicari, C. (2014). Toward understanding the potential of games for learning: Learning theory, game design characteristics, and situating video games in classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 31(1-2), 2–22. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2014.890879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans. Translation newly rev 1986 ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  95. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1977). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Goldbacher, E., Green, H., Miller, C., & Philip, S. (2003). Predicting the subjective experience of intrinsic motivation: The roles of self-determination, the balance of challenges and skills, and self-realization values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1447–1458. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Watson, J. B. (1925). Behaviorism. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  98. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  99. William deHaan, J. (2005). How Video Games can be used as an Effective Learning Environment for Cognitive apprenticeship theory-based learning. 2005 Annual Proceedings-Orlando: Volume# 2, 499.Google Scholar
  100. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wu, W. H., Hsiao, H. C., Wu, P. L., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Investigating the learning-theory foundations of game-based learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 265–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00437.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Becker
    • 1
  1. 1.Mount Royal UniversityCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations