From Multi-professional to Trans-professional Healthcare Teams: The Critical Role of Innovation Projects
This chapter addresses change and interprofessional collaboration in health care by contrasting two forms of collaborations. The first occurs in ongoing service delivery while the other takes place in project teams that are by definition temporary. Most practitioners and scholars discuss the many challenges of interprofessional collaboration in the context of continuous change efforts. However, collaboration differs when the need for change is more radical and innovative. The chapter explains why, and offers insight on how to manage projects interprofessionally.
We wish to thank Stacey McNulty and her help with this chapter. This chapter was also made possible by grants from the Telfer School of Management.
- Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE, Fugate M (2000) All in a day’s work: boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad Manage Rev 25:472–491Google Scholar
- Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, Hammick M, Freeth DS (2008) Effective interprofessional education: argument, assumption and evidence (promoting partnership for health). Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Besner C, Hobbs B (2006) The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Proj Manag J 37:37–48Google Scholar
- Chiocchio F, Rabbat F, Lebel P (2013) Training healthcare project teams: evidence despite challenges. In: 28th annual convention of the society for industrial and organizational psychology, Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
- D’Amour D (1999) Structuration de la collaboration interprofessionelle dans les services de santé de première ligne au Québec, Tese (Doutorado)-Université de Montreal, Montreal/Canadá, 1997. [Links]Google Scholar
- Goldman J, Meuser J, Rogers J, Reeves S (2010b) Interprofessional collaboration in family health teams: an Ontario-based study. Can Fam Physician 56:368–374Google Scholar
- Hartono E (2004) Knowledge, technology and inter-firm collaboration: a model and empirical study of collaborative commerce. Doctoral Dissertation, University of KentuckyGoogle Scholar
- Hobbs B (2014) The specifics of project contexts. In: Chiocchio F, Kelloway EK, Hobbs B (eds) The psychology and management of project teams: an interdisciplinary view. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Kristof ND, Wudunn S (2009) Half the sky: turning oppression into opportunity for women worldwide. Vintage Books, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Murphy PR, Jackson SE (1999) Managing role performance: challenges for twenty-first-century organizations and their employees. In: Pulakos ED, Ilgen DR (eds) The changing nature of performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
- Project Management Institute (2008) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
- Schippers MC, West MA, Dawson JF (2012). Team reflexivity and innovation: the moderating role of team context. J ManageGoogle Scholar