Advertisement

On Frank Golley’s International and Interdisciplinary Insights for a Twenty-First Century Earth Stewardship Based on Environmental Ethics

  • Alan P. CovichEmail author
Part of the Ecology and Ethics book series (ECET, volume 2)

Abstract

Current interest in developing a worldview to enhance Earth stewardship recognizes the importance of a multicultural perspective based on environmental ethics and a global understanding of the value of biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Frank Golley was a champion in developing and implementing ecosystem concepts based on “nature-centered thinking”. His environmental ethics-based principles emphasized “connectedness” among people and their environment that included the value of cultural differences in responding to natural and human-driven disturbances. Golley concluded that long-term, large-scale international studies are essential in evaluating the vulnerability of species and their habitats as well as ecosystem processes. Some ecological disturbances are easy to observe (e.g., floods, fires, hurricanes) while others (e.g., gradual loss of species, slow spread of invasive species) take longer to study but most require long-term research before their full impacts are known. Moreover, cumulative effects and indirect effects of complex interactions require multi-disciplinary research to sort out the causes and effects of changing ecosystem structure and function, often at a global scale. Research in tropical ecosystems demonstrated the need for organizing site-based research for extensive comparative studies. Golley’s international leadership accelerated progress in enhancing the understanding of how these long-term changes in tropical rainforests and agroecosystems can affect local populations and global connections with other ecosystems. Today ongoing studies of both wet and dry tropical forests are providing important data related to ecosystem services needed by local communities. Golley’s linking of ecosystem ecology, landscape ecology, and environmental ethics helped to define pragmatic sustainable “response systems” as a way to resolve complex tradeoffs among conflicting perspectives and his approach can continue to help develop ideas for Earth stewardship.

Keywords

Ecosystem services Environmental ethics Long-term ecosystem research Stewardship 

References

  1. Aguirre Sala J (2015) Hermeneutics and field environmental philosophy: integrating ecological sciences and ethics into earth stewardship. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 235–247Google Scholar
  2. Barrett GW, Barrett TL, Wu JG (eds) (2014) History of landscape ecology in the United States. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackstone WT (ed) (1974) Philosophy and environmental crisis. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  4. Brokaw N, Crowl T, Lugo A et al (eds) (2012) A Caribbean forest tapestry - the multi-dimensional nature of disturbance and response. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess RL (1981) United States. In: Kormody EJ, McCormick JF (eds) Handbook of contemporary developments in world ecology. Greenwood Press, Westport, pp 67–101Google Scholar
  6. Bush MB, Miller MC, De Oliveira PE et al (2000) Two histories of environmental change and human disturbance in eastern lowland Amazonia. The Holocene 10:543–553Google Scholar
  7. Callicott JB (1984) Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental philosophy. Am Philos Q 21:299–309Google Scholar
  8. Callicott JB (2015) The centennial return of stewardship to the Ecological Society of America. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 161–171Google Scholar
  9. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J et al (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:1305–1312PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapin FS III, Pickett STA, Power ME et al (2011) Earth stewardship: a strategy for social-ecological transformation to reverse planetary degradation. J Environ Stud Sci 1:44–53Google Scholar
  11. Chapin FS III, Pickett STA, Power ME et al (2015) Earth stewardship: an initiative by the Ecological Society of America to Foster Engagement to Sustain Planet Earth. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 173–194Google Scholar
  12. Coleman DC (2010) Big ecology: the emergence of ecosystem science. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  13. Covich AP (2015) Projects that never happened: ecological insights from Darien, Panama. Bull Ecol Soc Am (In press)Google Scholar
  14. Covich AP, Austen MC, Barlocher F et al (2004) The role of biodiversity in the functioning of freshwater and marine benthic ecosystems. BioScience 54:767–775Google Scholar
  15. Craige BJ (2002) Eugene Odum: ecosystem ecologist and environmentalist. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  16. Creager ANH (2013) Life atomic- a history of radioisotopes in science and medicine. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Cuddington K, Beisner BE (2005) Kuhnian paradigms lost: embracing the pluralism of ecological theory. In: Cuddington K, Beisner BE (eds) Ecological paradigms lost: routes of theory change, vol 2. Academic, New York, pp 419–428Google Scholar
  18. Daily GC, Söderqvist T, Aniyar S et al (2000) The value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289:395–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dallmeyer DG, Ike AF (eds) (1998) Environmental ethics and the global marketplace. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  20. De Laplante K (2004) Toward a more expansive conception of ecological science. Biology and Philosophy 19:263–281Google Scholar
  21. Dendoncker N, Keune H, Jacobs S et al (2014) Inclusive ecosystem services valuation. In: Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Keune H (eds) Ecosystem services: global issues, local practices. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  22. Di Pasquo F (2013) Una historia de la problemática ambiental y de sus efectos sobre la ecología disciplinar. Scientiae Studia 11:557–581Google Scholar
  23. Egerton FN (1973) Changing concepts in the balance of nature. Q Rev Biol 48:322–350Google Scholar
  24. Farley J, Costanza R (2010) Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecol Econ 69:2060–2068Google Scholar
  25. Farnsworth EG, Golley FB (eds) (1974) Fragile ecosystems: evaluation of research and application in the Neotropics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferré F, Hartel P (1994) Ethics and environmental policy: theory meets practice. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  27. Fu BJ, Su C-H, Wei Y-P et al (2011) Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecol Res 26:1–14Google Scholar
  28. Gatti LV, Gloor M, Miller JB, Doughty CE et al (2014) Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon balance revealed by atmospheric measurements. Nature 506:76–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Golley FB (1978) The Humpty-Dumpty problem. Bull Ecol Soc Am 59(3):128–130Google Scholar
  30. Golley FB (ed) (1983) Tropical rain forest ecosystems: structure and function, Ecosystems of the world 14A. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Golley FB (1984) Historical origins of the ecosystem concept in biology. In: Moran E (ed) The ecosystem concept in anthropology. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 33–49Google Scholar
  32. Golley F (1987a) Deep ecology from the perspective of ecological science. Environ Ethics 9:45–55Google Scholar
  33. Golley FB (1987b) Introducing landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 1:1–3Google Scholar
  34. Golley FB (1991) Reasoning form ecological knowledge to problem solving. In: Sontag MS, Wright SD, Young GL, Grace M (eds) Human ecology: strategies for the future. Society for Human Ecology, Fort Collins, pp 52–60Google Scholar
  35. Golley FB (1993) A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology: more than the sum of the parts. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  36. Golley FB (1994) Rebuilding a humane and ethical decision system for investing in natural capital. In: Janson AM, Hammer M, Folke C, Constanza R (eds) Investing in natural capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 169–178Google Scholar
  37. Golley FB (1998) A primer for environmental literacy. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  38. Golley FB (2001) Establishing the network. In: Barrett GW, Barrett TL (eds) Holistic science: the evolution of the Georgia Institute of Ecology (1940–2000). Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 38–67Google Scholar
  39. Golley PM, Golley FB (eds) (1972) Tropical ecology with an emphasis on organic production. Institute of Ecology, AthensGoogle Scholar
  40. Golley F, Hadley M (1981) The tropical forest, a rich but fragile resources. UNESCO Courier April; 13–16Google Scholar
  41. Golley FB, Medina E (eds) (1975) Tropical ecological systems: trends in terrestrial and aquatic research. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Golley FB, Odum HT, Wilson RF (1962) The structure and metabolism of a Puerto Rican red mangrove forest in May. Ecology 43:9–19Google Scholar
  43. Golley FB, Olein MD, Hoy DR (1971) Cognized environments of San Carlos valley settles. Rev Geogr 74:33–50Google Scholar
  44. Golley FB, McGinnis JT, Clements RG et al (1975) Mineral cycling in a tropical moist forest. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  45. Gómez-Pompa A, Anaya AL, Golley F et al (1974) Recovery of tropical ecosystems. In: Fragile ecosystems. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 113–138Google Scholar
  46. González G, Willig MR, Waide RB (2013) Ecological gradient analyses in a tropical landscape: multiple perspective and emerging themes. Ecol Bull 54:13–20Google Scholar
  47. Gosz RJ, Waide R, Magnuson J (2010) Twenty-eight years of the US-LTER program: experience, results, and research questions. In: Muller F, Schubert H, Klotz S (eds) Long term ecological research: between theory and application. Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, pp 54–75Google Scholar
  48. Granjou C, Mauz I, Louvel S et al (2013) Assessing nature? The genesis of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Sci Technol Soc 18:9Google Scholar
  49. Hagen JB (1989) Research perspectives and the anomalous status of modern ecology. Biol Philos 4:433–455Google Scholar
  50. Hagen JB (1992) An entangled bank: the origins of ecosystem ecology. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  51. Hagen JB (2008) Teaching ecology during the environmental age, 1965–1980. Environ Hist 13:704–723Google Scholar
  52. Harris NL, Lugo AE, Brown S et al (2012) Luquillo experimental forest: research history and opportunities. USDA EFR-1, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall C (eds) (2013) Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Hotes S, Opgenoorth L (2014) Trust and control at the science-policy interface in IPBES. BioScience 64:277–278Google Scholar
  55. Hutchinson GE (1940) Bio-ecology. Ecology 21:267–268Google Scholar
  56. Hutchinson GE (1941) Limnological studies of Connecticut. IV. Mechanisms of intermediate metabolism in stratified lakes. Ecol Monogr 11:21–60Google Scholar
  57. Hutchinson GE (1948) Circular causal systems in ecology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 50:221–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Jordan CF (1983) Productivity of tropical rain forest ecosystems and the implications for their use as future wood and energy sources. In: Golley FB (ed) Tropical rain forest ecosystems: structure and function. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 117–136Google Scholar
  59. Jordan CF (1987) Amazonian rain forests: ecosystem disturbance and recovery. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Jordan CF (2001) Tropical ecology with the institute of ecology. In: Barrett GW, Barrett TL (eds) Holistic science: the evolution of the Georgia institute of ecology (1940–2000). Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 261–276Google Scholar
  61. Keller DR, Golley FB (2000) The philosophy of ecology: from science to synthesis. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  62. Kingsland SE (1995) Modeling nature: episodes in the history of population ecology, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  63. Kingsland SE (2015) Ecological science and practice: dialogues across cultures and disciplines. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 17–26Google Scholar
  64. Kwa C (1993) Radiation ecology, systems ecology, and management of the environment. In: Science and nature: essays in the history of environmental science. British Society for the History of Science, Oxford, pp 213–249Google Scholar
  65. Kwa C (2005) Local ecologies and global science: discourses and strategies of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Soc Stud Sci 35:923–950Google Scholar
  66. Larigauderie A, Mooney H (2010) The intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1(2):9–14Google Scholar
  67. Levin SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1:431–436Google Scholar
  68. Levin SA (1999) Fragile dominion. Perseus Publishing, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  69. Likens GE (1998) Limitations to intellectual progress in ecosystem science. In: 7th Cary conference: successes, limitations and frontiers in ecosystem science. Springer, New York, pp 247–271Google Scholar
  70. Likens GE, Lindenmayer DB (2012) Integrating approaches leads to more effective conservation of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 21:3323–3341Google Scholar
  71. Limburg KE (2004) The biogeochemistry of strontium: a review of H.T. Odum’s contributions. Ecol Model 1778:31–33Google Scholar
  72. Loreau M (2010) From populations to ecosystem. The theoretical foundations for a new ecological synthesis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  73. Lovejoy TE (2002) Biodiversity: threats and challenges. In: O’Riordan T, Stoll-Kleemann S (eds) Biodiversity, sustainability, and human communities: protecting beyond the protected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–45Google Scholar
  74. Lugo AE (2004) HT Odum and the Luquillo Experimental Forest. Ecol Model 178:65–74Google Scholar
  75. Lugo AE, Heartsill-Scalley T (2014) Research in the Luquillo experimental forest has advanced understanding of tropical forests and resolved management issues. In: Hayes DC et al (eds) USDA Forest Service experimental forests and ranges. Springer, New York, pp 435–461Google Scholar
  76. Lugo AE, Waide RB, Willig MR et al (2012) Ecological paradigms for the tropics: old questions and continuing challenges. In: Brokaw N, Crowl TA, Lugo AE et al (eds) A Caribbean forest tapestry- The multi-dimensional nature of disturbance and response. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–41Google Scholar
  77. Maass M, Equihua M (2015) Earth stewardship, socioecosystems, the need for a transdisciplinary approach and the role of the International Long Term Ecological Research network (ILTER). In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 217–233Google Scholar
  78. Maass JM, Jaramillo V, Martínez-Yrízar A, García-Oliva F, Pérez-Jiménez A, Sarukhán J (2002) Aspectos funcionales del ecosistema de selva baja caducifolia en Chamela, Jalisco. In: Noguera FA, Vega-Rivera JH, García-Aldrete AN et al (eds) Historia Natural de Chamela. UNAM, Mexico, pp 525–542Google Scholar
  79. Maass JM, Balvanera P, Castillo A et al (2005) Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from longterm ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecol Soc 10(1):1–23Google Scholar
  80. MacIntosh RP (1987) Pluralism in ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:321–341Google Scholar
  81. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1993) Humans as components of ecosystems: the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. McLauchlan KK, Williams JJ, Engstrom DR (2013) Nutrient cycling in the palaeorecord: fluxes from terrestrial to aquatic ecosystems. The Holocene 23:1635–1643Google Scholar
  83. Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B III, Vörösmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global change and terrestrial net primary productivity. Nature 363:234–240Google Scholar
  84. Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Washington, DC. doi: 10.7930/J0Z31WJ2
  85. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  86. Mitman G (1992) The state of nature: ecology, community, and American social thought, 1900–1950. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  87. Montagnini F, Ibrahim M, Restrepo EM (2013) Silvopastoral systems and climate change mitigation in Latin America. Bois et Forets des Tropiques 316:3–16Google Scholar
  88. Mooney HA (1996) Ecosystem physiology: overview and synthesis. In: Walker BH, Steffen WL (eds) Global change and terrestrial ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  89. Mooney HA, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A (2013) Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:3665–3672PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) (2009) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  91. Norton BG (ed) (1986) The preservation of species. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  92. Odum HT (1951) The stability of the world strontium cycle. Science 114:407–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Odum EP (1977) The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science 195:1289–1293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Odum EP, Golley FB (1963) Radioactive tracers as an aid to the measurement of energy flow at the population level in nature. In: Schultz V, Klement AW Jr (eds) Radioecology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 403–410Google Scholar
  95. Odum HT, Jordan CF (1970) Metabolism and evaportranspiration of the lower forest in a giant cylinder. In: Odum HT, Pigeon RF (eds) A tropical rainforest: a study of irradiation and ecology at El Verde, Puerto Rico. US Atomic Energy Commission TID-24270, Springfield, pp I65–I189Google Scholar
  96. Palmer MA (2012) Socio-environmental sustainability and actionable science. BioScience 62:5–6Google Scholar
  97. Patten BC (2014) Systems ecology and environmentalism: getting the science right. Part I: Facets for a more holistic nature book of ecology. Ecol Model 293:4–21Google Scholar
  98. Perring MP, Standish RJ, Hobbs RJ (2013) Incorporating novelty and novel ecosystems into restoration planning and practice in the 21st century. Ecol Process 2:18Google Scholar
  99. Pickett STA (2013) The flux of nature: changing worldviews and inclusive concepts. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C et al (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, pp 265–280Google Scholar
  100. Pickett STA, Kolasa J, Jones CG (1994) Ecological understanding. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  101. Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R et al (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:1246752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Power ME, Chapin FS III (2009) Planetary stewardship. Front Ecol Environ 7:399Google Scholar
  103. Raven PH, Chase JM, Pires JC (2011) Introduction to special issue on biodiversity. Am J Bot 98:333–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Reiners WA, Lockwood JA (2010) Philosophical foundations for the practice of ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  105. Rolston H III (1988) Environmental ethics: duties and values in the natural world. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  106. Rolston H III (1994) Conserving natural value. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  107. Rozzi R (1999) The reciprocal links between evolutionary – ecological sciences and environmental ethics. BioScience 49:911–921Google Scholar
  108. Rozzi R (2013) Biocultural ethics: from biocultural homogenization toward biocultural conservation. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C et al (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, pp 9–32Google Scholar
  109. Rozzi R, Armesto JJ, Gutiérrez J et al (2012) Integrating ecology and environmental ethics: earth stewardship in the southern end of the Americas. BioScience 62:226–236Google Scholar
  110. Shugart HH (1998) Terrestrial ecosystems in changing environments. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  111. Simberloff D (2014) Introduced species, homogenizing biotas and cultures. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C et al (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, pp 33–48Google Scholar
  112. Steffen W, Sanderson RA, Tyson PD et al (2004) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  113. Taylor PJ (2005) Unruly complexity: ecology, interpretation, engagement. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  114. Tjossem SF (1994) Preservation of nature and academic respectability: tension in the Ecological Society of America, 1915–1979. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  115. Turner MG (2010) Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91:2833–2849PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Turner MG, Chapin FS III (2005) Causes and consequences of spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem function. In: Lovett GM, Jones CG, Turner MG et al (eds) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Springer, New York, pp 9–30Google Scholar
  117. Uhl C (2003) Developing ecological consciousness: paths to a sustainable future. Rowman and Littlefield, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  118. Uhl C, Jordan CF (1984) Succession and nutrient dynamics following forest cutting and burning in Amazonia. Ecology 65:1476–1490Google Scholar
  119. Uhl C, Buschbacher ND, Clark R et al (1990) Studies of ecosystem response to natural and anthropogenic disturbances provide guidelines for designing sustainable land-use systems in Amazonia. In: Anderson AB (ed) Alternatives to deforestation: steps towards sustainable use of the Amazon rain forest. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 24–42Google Scholar
  120. Vose JM, Maass JM (1999) A comparative analysis of hydrologic responses of tropical deciduous and temperate deciduous watershed ecosystems to climatic change. In: Aguirre-Bravo CF, Rodriguez C (eds) North American science symposium: toward a unified framework for inventorying and monitoring forest ecosystem resources, Proceedings RMRS-P-12. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, pp 292–298Google Scholar
  121. Waide RB, Thomas MO (2013) Long-term ecological research network. In: Earth system monitoring. Springer, New York, pp 233–268Google Scholar
  122. Willig MR, Bloch CP, Covich AP et al (2012) Long-term research in the Luquillo mountains: synthesis and foundations for the future. In: Brokaw N, Crowl TA, Lugo AE et al (eds) A Caribbean forest tapestry – the multi-dimensional nature of disturbance and response. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 361–441Google Scholar
  123. Woodwell GM (1962) Effects of ionizing radiation on terrestrial ecosystems. Science 138:572–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Wright SD, Borden R, Bubolz M et al (1995) Human ecology: progress through integrative perspectives. Society for Human Ecology, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  125. Wu J (2014) Hierarchy theory: an overview. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C et al (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, pp 281–302Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Odum School of Ecology, Institute of EcologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations