Earth Stewardship, Climate Change, and Low Carbon Consciousness: Reflections from Brazil and South America

  • Eduardo ViolaEmail author
  • Larissa Basso
Part of the Ecology and Ethics book series (ECET, volume 2)


The planet has entered the Anthropocene, a period in which humanity is the main driver of Earth systems changes. The effects of these fast and profound changes have been devastating for several fellow species – extinct or threatened to be extinct – and endanger a great part of the human population. In order to rebalance human interests and the equilibrium of the planet, Earth Stewardship, paradigm in which humanity recognizes itself as a co-inhabitant and steward of the planet, should be implemented. However, deep-rooted cultural traits can be stumbling blocks to the development of this new planetary ethics, and this is the case for South America. This chapter discusses the foundations of a new planetary ethics in South America and the challenges for its implementations, exemplified by one of the most contemporary complex issues, climate change.


Anthropocene Biophysical planetary boundaries Climate change Environmental policy Long term decision-making Planetary consciousness 


  1. Brasil (2013) Estimativas anuais de emissões de gases de efeito estufa no Brasil. Accessed 12 Jan 2014
  2. Chapin FS III, Power ME, Pickett STA et al (2011) Earth Stewardship: science for action to sustain the human-earth system. Ecosphere 2(8) article 89:01–20Google Scholar
  3. Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The ‘Anthropocene’. Glob Chang Newsl 41:17–18Google Scholar
  4. Grimm NB, Jacob KL (2013) Evaluating climate impacts on people and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11:455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Halperin Donghi T (1970) História contemporanea de America Latina. Alianza, MadridGoogle Scholar
  6. Holzmann R, Hinz R (2005) Old-age income support in the 21st century: an international perspective on pension systems and reform. World Bank, Washington, DC. Accessed 19 June 2014
  7. Jamieson D (2011) The nature of the problem. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 38–54Google Scholar
  8. Mainwaring S, Viola E (1984) New social movements, political culture and democracy: Brazil and Argentina in the 1980s. Telos 1984(61):17–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. North RC (1990) War, peace, survival: global politics and conceptual synthesis. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Donnel G (1999) Poliarchies and the (un)rule of law in Latin America. In: Mendez J, O’Donnel G, Pinheiro PS (eds) The (un)rule of law and the underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame University, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  11. Ostrom E, Cox M (2010) Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social ecological analysis. Environ Conserv 37(4):451–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Padua JA (2004) Um sopro de destruição: pensamento político e crítica ambiental no Brasil escravista, 1786–1888. Editora Zahar, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  13. Power ME, Chapin FS III (2010) Planetary stewardship, with an introduction from the Editor-in-Chief. Bull Ecol Soc Am 91:143–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prins G, Galiana I, Green C et al (2010) The Hartwell paper – a new direction for climate policy after the crash of 2009, London School of Economics and University of Oxford. Accessed 2 May 2014
  15. Ribeiro GL (2009) Non-hegemonic globalizations. Alternative transnational processes and agents. Anthropol Theory 9:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rockstrom J, Steffen W, Noone K et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(24):472–475. Accessed 1 May 2014
  17. Rozzi R et al (2013) Biocultural ethics: from biocultural homogenization toward biocultural conservation. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, pp 9–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Socolow RH, English MR (2011) Living ethically in a greenhouse. In: Arnold DG (ed) The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 170–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steffen W (2011) A truly complex and diabolical policy problem. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–37Google Scholar
  20. Timonen V (2008) Ageing societies: a comparative introduction. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  21. UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. Accessed 1 May 2014
  22. United Nations Conference On Sustainable Development – UNCSD (2012) The future we want; United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/66/288. Accessed 1 May 2014
  23. US Global Change Research Program (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States. Accessed 19 June 2014
  24. Vergara W, Alatorre C, Alves L (2013) Rethinking our energy future a white paper on renewable energy for the 3GFLAC regional forum, Inter-American Development Bank, Climate Change and Sustainability Division Energy Division, Discussion paper no. IDB-DP-292, Accessed 19 June 2014
  25. Viola E (1987) O movimento ecológico no Brasil: do ambientalismo à ecopolítica. Rev Bras Ciências Sociais 1(3)Google Scholar
  26. Viola E (1988) The ecologist movement in Brazil (1974–86): from environmentalism to ecopolitics. Int J Urban Reg Res 12(2):211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Viola E (1997) The environment movement in Brazil: institutionalization, sustainable development and crisis of governance since 1987. In: Macdonald GJ, Neilson D, Stern MA (eds) Latin American environmental policy in international perspective. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  28. Viola E (2002) O regime internacional de mudança climática e o Brasil. Rev Bras Ciências Soc 17(50): 25–46. Accessed 1 May 2014
  29. Viola E (2013) Brazilian climate policy since 2005: continuity, change and prospective. Centre for European Policy Studies Working document no. 373. Accessed 1 May 2014
  30. Viola E, Basso L (2014) Amazonian policy and politics, 2003–13: deforestation, hydropower and biofuels. In: NOREF – Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre Report. Accessed 1 May 2014
  31. Viola E, Franchini M (2012) Os limiares planetários, a Rio+20 e o papel do Brasil. Cadernos EBAPE 10(3):470–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Viola E, Franchini M (2013) Brasil na governança global do clima, 2005–2012: a luta entre conservadores e reformistas. Contexto Internacional 35(1):43–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Viola E, Leis H (2008) America del Sur en el mundo de las democracias de mercado. Cadal Homo Sapiens, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  34. Viola E, Franchini M, Ribeiro TL (2012) Climate Governance in an international system under conservative hegemony: the role of major powers. Rev Bras Política Int 55(special edition):9–29Google Scholar
  35. Viola E, Franchini M, Ribeiro TL (2013) Sistema internacional de hegemonia conservadora – governança global e democracia na era da crise climática. Annablume, São PauloGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Climate Change and International Relations Research Programme, Institute of International RelationsUniversity of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations