Ecology and Education in Marine Protected Areas: Insights from Brazil and South America

  • Flávio BerchezEmail author
  • Andrés Mansilla
  • Natália P. Ghilardi-Lopes
  • Evangelina Schwindt
  • Kelen Leite
  • Ricardo Rozzi
Part of the Ecology and Ethics book series (ECET, volume 2)


South American coastal habitats include a wide range of benthic ecosystems, many of which are unique and constitute hotspots of biodiversity. Marine protected areas (MPAs), instituted mostly during the second half of the twentieth Century, are considered a key management tool to conserve regional biodiversity, prevent overexploitation, and generate economic benefits. Educational actions to promote changes in basic values, principles, and attitudes – although considered also as a main objective – frequently have a poor conceptual basis. In conjunction with the evaluation of their effectiveness by long-term, site-based ecological and socio-economic research, in Brazil MPAs are aiming to implement a holistic approach. This will allow the development and testing of environmental practices that integrate ecology, economy, ethics, and conflict resolution in the different uses of marine space. However, ecological long-term studies, socio-economic long-term evaluation, and the integration of education and ethics are still incipient. With the recent creation of some independent networks in different South American countries related to the assessment of biological communities, marine biologists of this continent are now focusing more on: (1) sharing methodologies and data to allow comparative and integrated continental analyses, and (2) integrating social components, including not only economic but also ethical values and participatory approaches. Toward this aim, the Chilean Long Term Socio- Ecological Research network (LTSER-Chile) has developed a Field Environmental Philosophy program that could be adapted to MPAs educational programs, and also contribute to the integration of ecology and ethics in theory and praxis for an Earth Stewardship initiative.


Benthic ecosystems Environmental education Long term research Marine protected areas Monitoring 


  1. Abecasis RC, Schmidt L, Longnecker N et al (2013) Ocean & coastal management implications of community and stakeholder perceptions of the marine environment and its conservation for MPA management in a small Azorean island. Ocean Coast Manag 84:208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguirre Sala J (2015) Hermeneutic and field environmental philosophy to integrate ecological sciences and ethics into earth stewardship. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 235–247Google Scholar
  3. Amado-Filho GM, Maneveldt GW, Pereira Filho GH, Manso RCC, Bahia RG, Barros-Barreto MB et al (2010) Seaweed diversity associated with a Brazilian tropical rhodolith bed. Cienc Mar 36(4):371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates AE, Barrett NS, Stuart-Smith RD, Holbrook NJ, Thompson PA, Edgar GJ (2013) Resilience and signatures of tropicalization in protected reef fish communities. Nat Clim Chang 4(1):62–67. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berchez F, Carvalhal F, Robim MJ (2005) Underwater interpretative trail: guidance to improve education and decrease ecological damage. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 4(2):128–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berchez F, Ghilardi N, Robim MJ et al (2007) Projeto Trilha Subaquática: sugestão de diretrizes para a criação de modelos de educação ambiental em unidades de conservação ligadas a ecossistemas marinhos. OLAM Ciên Tecnologia 7(3):181–209Google Scholar
  7. Berchez F, Tiago CG, Rosso S et al (2009) Structure of a coralline algal bed on southeastern Brazil. Braz J Ecol 13:49–57Google Scholar
  8. Bidle KD, Falkowski PG (2004) Cell death in planktonic, photosynthetic microorganisms. Nature reviews. Microbiology 2(8):643–655. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro956 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brasil (2000) Lei 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Regulamenta o art. 225, § 1o, incisos I, II, III e VII da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  10. Brechin SR (2012) Shaping US climate opinion. Nat Clim Chang 2:236–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Clim Change 114(2):169–188. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campagna C, Falabella V, Tagliorette A et al (2007) El mar des-protegido: zonificación y conservación de la biodiversidad. In: Boltovskoy D (ed) Atlas de Sensibilidad Ambiental de la costa y el Mar Argentino.
  13. Chapin FS III, Pickett STA, Power ME et al (2015) Earth stewardship: an initiative by the Ecological Society of America to foster engagement to sustain planet earth. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 173–194Google Scholar
  14. Costa B, Erzini K, Caselle J et al (2013) “Reserve effect” within a temperate marine protected area in the north-eastern Atlantic (Arrábida Marine Park, Portugal). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 481:11–24. doi: 10.3354/meps10204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coumou D, Rahmstorf S (2012) A decade of weather extremes. Nat Clim Chang 2(7):491–496. doi: 10.1038/Nclimate1452 Google Scholar
  16. Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Willis TJ et al (2014) Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature 506(7487):216. doi: 10.1038/Nature13022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Floeter SR, Halpern BS, Ferreira CEL (2006) Effects of fishing and protection on Brazilian reef fishes. Biol Conserv 128:391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francini-Filho RB, Moura RL (2008a) Dynamics of fish assemblages on coral reefs subjected to different management regimes in the Abrolhos Bank, eastern Brazil. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 18(7):1166–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Francini-Filho RB, Moura RL (2008b) Evidence for spillover of reef fishes from a no-take marine reserve: an evaluation using the before-after control-impact (BACI) approach. Fish Res 93(3):346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraschetti S, Bevilacqua S, Guarnieri G et al (2012) Idiosyncratic effects of protection in a remote marine reserve. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 466:21-+. doi: 10.3354/Meps09937
  21. Gambarotta JC (2006) Estado actual, propuestas y perspectivas de manejo de las Áreas Protegidas Costeras. In: Menafra R, Rodríguez-Gallego L, Scarabino F et al (eds) Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa uruguaya. Vida Silvestre Uruguay, Montevideo, p 668Google Scholar
  22. Gerhardinger LC, Godoy EAS, Jones PJS et al (2011) Marine protected dramas: the flaws of the Brazilian national system of marine protected areas. Environ Manage 47(4):630–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghilardi NP, Berchez F (2010) Projeto Trilha Subaquática - modelos de educação ambiental marinha para o grande público. In: Pedrini AG (ed) Educação ambiental marinha e costeira no Brasil. EdUERJ, Rio de Janeiro, pp 71–91Google Scholar
  24. Ghilardi NP, Pereira Filho GH, Berchez F (2008) Current knowledge status of the ecology of hard bottom benthic communities in Brazil and the need for new approaches. Oecol Brasiliensis 12(2):197–205Google Scholar
  25. Ghilardi-Lopes NP (2014) Engaging people in the conservation of ‘non-charismatic’ benthic marine organisms: a Brazilian case study. Eingana 37:11–13Google Scholar
  26. Ghilardi-Lopes NP, Hadel VF, Berchez F (2012) Guia para Educação Ambiental em Costões Rochosos. Artmed, Porto AlegreGoogle Scholar
  27. Gore A (2006) An inconvenient truth: the planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it. Rodale Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Guarderas PG (2007) Marine conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean: an analysis of marine protected areas (MPAs). Masters Thesis, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris RE (2010) University of Concepcion Marine Station, Dichato, Chile. J Plankton Res 32(8):1103–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heffernan O (2012) Adapting to a warmer world: no going back. Nature 491(7426):659–661. doi: 10.1038/491659a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodgson G (1999) A global assessment of human effects on coral reefs. Mar Pollut Bull 38(5):345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howe PD, Markowitz EM, Lee TM et al (2012) Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nat Clim Chang 3(4):352–356. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huntington BE, Lirman D (2012) Coral species richness estimates are sensitive to differences in reef size and regional diversity. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 10:110–116. doi: 10.4319/lom.2012.10.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huntington BE, Karnauskas M, Babcock EA et al (2010) Untangling natural seascape variation from marine reserve effects using a landscape approach. PLoS One 5(8):e12327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012327 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hurwitz BL, Hallam SJ, Sullivan MB (2013) Metabolic reprogramming by viruses in the sunlit and dark ocean. Genome Biol 14(11):R123. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-11-r123 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. IUCN, UNEP-WCMC (2010) The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) 2010. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahan D (2012) Why we are poles apart on climate change. Nature 488:255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kearney R, Farebrother G, Buxton CD et al (2013) How terrestrial management concepts have led to unrealistic expectations of marine protected areas. Mar Policy 38:304–311. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. La Trobe HL, Acott TG (2000) A modified NEP/DSP environmental attitudes scale. J Environ Educ 32:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lawler JJ, White D, Neilson RP et al (2006) Predicting climate-induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability. Glob Chang Biol 12(8):1568–1584. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01191.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leão ZMDAN, Kikuchi RKP, Oliveira MDM et al (2010) Status of Eastern Brazilian coral reefs in time of climate changes. Pan Am J Aquat Sci 5:224–235Google Scholar
  42. Leviston Z, Walker I, Morwinski S (2013) Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nat Clim Chang 3:334–337. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Vaughan S (2013) The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nat Clim Chang 3:399–404. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lubchenco J, Palumbi SR, Gaines SD et al (2003) Plugging a hole in the ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13(1):S3–S7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maass M, Equihua M (2015) Earth stewardship, the need for a transdisciplinary approach and the role of the International Long-Term Ecological Research Network (ILTER). In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 217–233Google Scholar
  46. Matos LFOR (2009) Percepção ambiental de estudantes de uma escola da região central de Cuiabá, MT. Masters Thesis, Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoGoogle Scholar
  47. Miloslavich P, Klein E, Díaz JM et al (2011) Marine biodiversity in the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of South America: knowledge and gaps. PLoS One 6:e14631CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Moritz MA (2012) Wildfires ignite debate on global warming. Nature 487(7407):273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C et al (2012) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang 3(4):343–347. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Navarrete S, Gelcich S, Castilla J (2010) Long-term monitoring of coastal ecosystems at Las Cruces, Chile: defining baselines to build ecological literacy in a world of change. Rev Chil Hist Nat 83:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orenstein DE, Groner E (2015) Using the ecosystem services framework in a Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) platform: lessons from the Wadi Araba Desert, Israel and Jordan. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 281–296Google Scholar
  52. Osborn D, Pearse J, Roe C (2005) Monitoring rocky intertidal shorelines: a role for the public in resource management. In: Magoon OT, Converse H, Baird B, Jines B, Miller-Henson M (eds) California and the world ocean ‘02: revisiting and revising California’s ocean Agenda. American Society of Civil Engineers, California, pp 624–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pedrini AG, Brito MIMS (2006) Educação Ambiental para o desenvolvimento ou sociedade sustentável? Uma breve reflexão para a América Latina. Rev Educação Ambient Ação 17:20Google Scholar
  54. Pereira-Filho GH, Amado-Filho GM, Moura RL et al (2011) Extensive Rhodolith beds cover the summits of Southwestern Atlantic Ocean Seamounts. J Coast Res 28(1):261–269Google Scholar
  55. Pimm SL (1994) A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology – more than the sum of the parts – Golley FB. Nature 370(6486):188. doi: 10.1038/370188b0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Redman CL, Miller TR (2015) The technosphere and earth stewardship. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, 269–279Google Scholar
  57. Robim MJ, Vilar DD, Fonseca FF, Cocco MDA (2008) Caminhos para a conservação do patrimônio cultural em Unidades de Conservação. O caso do Parque Estadual da Ilha Anchieta. OLAM – Ciênc Tecnol 8(2):104–130Google Scholar
  58. Rozzi R (2013) Biocultural ethics: from biocultural homogenization toward biocultural conservation. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C et al (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, pp 9–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rozzi R, Massardo F (2011) The road to biocultural ethics. Front Ecol Environ 9(4):246–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rozzi R, Armesto JJ, Gutierrez JR et al (2012) Integrating ecology and environmental ethics: earth stewardship in the southern end of the Americas. BioScience 62(3):226–236. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.3.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saheb D, Asinelli-Luz A (2006) As representações de meio ambiente de professores e alunos e a pedagogia de projetos: um estudo de caso em classes de alfabetização. Rev Eletrônica Mestr Educ Amb 16:163–178Google Scholar
  62. Sala E, Costello C, Dougherty D et al (2013) A general business model for marine reserves. PLoS One 8(4):e58799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058799 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. SAyDS (2007) Efectividad del manejo de las áreas protegidas marino-costeras de la Argentina. Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nación: Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  64. Schiavetti A, Manz J, DosSantos CZ et al (2013) Marine protected areas in Brazil: an ecological approach regarding the large marine ecosystems. Ocean Coast Manag 76:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24(9):467–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Spalding MD, Fox HE, Allen GR et al (2007) Marine ecoregions of the World: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience 57(7):573–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tollefson J (2012) Hurricane sweeps US into climate-adaptation debate. Nature 491(7423):167–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Turra A, Cróquer A, Carranza A et al (2013) Global environmental changes: setting priorities for Latin American coastal habitats. Glob Chang Biol 19(7):1965–1969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wallace JM, Held IM, Thompson DWJ et al (2014) Global warming and winter weather. Science 343(6172):729–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Whyte AVT (1977) Guidelines for field studies in environmental perception. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  71. Zaller JR (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zaval L, Keenan EA, Johnson EJ et al (2014) How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nat Clim Chang 4(2):143–147. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flávio Berchez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrés Mansilla
    • 2
    • 3
  • Natália P. Ghilardi-Lopes
    • 4
  • Evangelina Schwindt
    • 5
  • Kelen Leite
    • 6
  • Ricardo Rozzi
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentInstituto de Biociências, Universidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratorio de macroalgas Antarticas y SubantarticasUniversidad de MagallanesPunta ArenasChile
  3. 3.Institute of Ecology and BiodiversitySantiagoChile
  4. 4.Centro de Ciências Naturais e HumanasUniversidade Federal do ABCSão Bernardo do CampoBrazil
  5. 5.Grupo de Ecología em Ambientes CosterosCentro Nacional Patagónico (CENPAT-CONICET)Puerto MadrynArgentina
  6. 6.Estação Ecológica TupinambásICMBioSão SebastiãoBrazil
  7. 7.Department of Philosophy and Religion StudiesUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA
  8. 8.Institute of Ecology and BiodiversitySantiagoChile
  9. 9.Universidad de MagallanesPunta ArenasChile

Personalised recommendations