Skip to main content

Toward the Development of Cognitive Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brain-Inspired Computing (BrainComp 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8603))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1064 Accesses


With the aim of endowing robots with the ability to engage people in real social interactions, it is currently typical that novel architectures for robot control take into account in its internal design concepts and schemes originated from cognitive theories. The objective is that robots will be able to emanate responses at human interaction rates and exhibit a pro-active behaviour. This pro-active behaviour implies that the internal architecture of these robots should not only be able to perceive and act. It should also be able to perform off-line reasoning. This paper introduces RoboCog, a new cognitive architecture whose four core elements are a deep -in the concrete-abstract dimension- and hybrid -in the symbolic-numeric dimension- representation of the current state, including the robot itself and the observed world; a set of agents that provide broad functionalities such as navigation, body movement control, dialog or object recognition, and as a result build and maintain this representation; an internal emulation and planning facility where foreseen courses of action can be inferred and tested; and an Executive module that coordinates the interactions among all others. Furthermore, agents themselves can reproduce internally this architecture, including their own replicas of the four elements. The typical scheme of 3-tier architectures is therefore replaced by a recursive estructure that provides a more flexible scenario, where the responses of all agents are tied together by the use of a common inner representation. Preliminar results of the proposed architecture in real scenarios show how RoboCog is able to enhance the effectiveness and time-of-response of complex multi-degree-of-freedom robots designed to collaborate with humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Alcázar, V., Guzmán, C., Milla, G., Prior, D., Borrajo, C., Castillo, L., Onaindia, E.: PELEA: planning, learning and execution architecture. In: Proceedings of the 28th Workshop of the UK Planning and Scheduling Special Interest Group, Brescia-Italy (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bustos, P., Martínez-Gómez, J., García-Varea, I., Rodríguez-Ruiz, L., Bachiller, P., Calderita, L., Manso, L.J., Sánchez, A., Bandera, A., Bandera, J.P.: Multimodal interaction with Loki. In: Workshop on Agentes Físicos, Madrid-Spain (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calderita, L.V., Bustos, P., Suárez-Mejías, C., Fernández, F., Bandera, A.: Therapist: towards an autonomous socially interactive robot for motor and neurorehabilitation therapies for children. In: Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques Workshop (REHAB2013), Venice-Italy (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, A.: An embodied cognitive science? Trends Cogn. Sci. 3(9), 345–351 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Decety, J., Grezes, J.: The power of simulation: imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Res. 1079, 4–14 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gat, E.: On three-layer architectures. In: Kortenkamp, D., Bonnasso, R.P., Murphy, R. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Mobile Robots, pp. 195–210. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grafton, S., Hamilton, A.: Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26(4), 590–616 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grezes, J., Frith, C.D., Passingham, R.E.: Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 21, 744–750 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haggard, P., Tsakiris, M.: The experience of agency: feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18, 242–246 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hesslow, G.: The current status of the simulation theory of cognition. Brain Res. 1428, 71–79 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holland, O.: The future of embodied artificial intelligence: machine consciousness? In: Iida, F., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L., Kuniyoshi, Y. (eds.) Embodied Artificial Intelligence. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3139, pp. 37–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawato, M., Wolpert, D.: Internal models for motor control. In: Bock, G.R., Goode, J.A. (eds.) Novartis Foundation Symposium 218: Sensory Guidance of Movement, pp. 291–307. Wiley, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pacherie, E.: The sense of control and the sense of agency. Psyche 13(1), 1–30 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prinz, W.: Experimental approaches to action. In: Roessler, J., Eilan, N. (eds.) Agency and Self-Awareness, pp. 175–187. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L.: Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn. Brain Res. 3, 131–141 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roy, D., Hsiao, K., Mavridis, N.: Mental imagery for a conversational robot. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 34(3), 1374–1383 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sommerville, J.A., Decety, J.: Weaving the fabric of social interaction: articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13(2), 179–200 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein, L.A.: Imagination and Situated Cognition. AI Memo 1277, MIT AI Lab (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This contribution has been partially granted by the Spanish Government and FEDER funds under coordinated project TIN2012-38079. RoboCog is a cognitive architecture being developed as a common effort among several research groups at different universities including the University of Extremadura (RoboLab), the University of Castilla-La Mancha (SIMD), the University of Málaga (ISIS and GISUM), the University Carlos III of Madrid (PLG) and the University of Jaén (M2P). The robotic therapy for motor rehabilitation is conducted with the group of Technological Innovation (GIT) and the Rehabilitation Department of the Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (HUVR, Seville).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Bandera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bandera, A., Bustos, P. (2014). Toward the Development of Cognitive Robots. In: Grandinetti, L., Lippert, T., Petkov, N. (eds) Brain-Inspired Computing. BrainComp 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8603. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12083-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12084-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics