Skip to main content

Influence of Surfactant Adsorption on Surface-Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles for Gas Foam Stability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanoparticles: An Emerging Technology for Oil Production and Processing Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Nanoscale Science and Technology ((LNNST,volume 32))

  • 556 Accesses

Abstract

Insufficient foam stability hinders the applications of the foam injection technique for enhanced oil recovery. To date, to improve foam stability, nanoparticles have been synergistically used with surfactants. Thus, evaluating the interactions between nanoparticles and surfactants is essential to understand and improve foam stability. In a surfactant solution involving nanoparticle dispersions, nanoparticles and ionic surfactants possess net surface charges that lead to electrostatic interaction-induced adsorption of surfactant molecules on nanoparticles. The adsorption of surfactants on nanoparticles changes their surface wettability, leading to their migration to the bubble-fluid interface formed by the foam. In this work, silica nanoparticles with different surface characteristics were used in conjunction with alpha olefin sulfonate as a surfactant to stabilize natural gas foams. The incorporation of nanoparticles to natural gas foams improved surfactant performance by 70%. Besides, nanoparticle-surfactant interactions were analyzed through adsorption experiments to provide insights into the effects of nanomaterials on the stability of natural gas foams. The adsorption of the surfactant is higher on silica nanoparticles that exhibit the lowest acidic surface and surface charge in comparison with the evaluated nanomaterials, which substantially affect electrostatic interaction-driven surfactant adsorption on the nanoparticles. The foam stability tests showed that the surfactant/nanoparticle ratio is critical to improving foam stability for each nanomaterial, because high surfactant adsorption can decrease the foam stability. For materials with higher adsorption affinity, to obtain highly stable foams, the amount of nanoparticles was reduced by 50% compared with the materials with lower adsorption affinity. The optimal surfactant/nanoparticle ratio with the lowest nanoparticle amount, which led to the most stable foam obtained, was evaluated at reservoir conditions in a natural gas core flooding test. The results showed an 18% increase in oil recovery in the presence of surfactant solutions with nanoparticles, indicating mitigation of gas injection drawbacks due to the blockage of preferential channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. E.J. Manrique et al., EOR: current status and opportunities, in SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Yekeen et al., A comprehensive review of experimental studies of nanoparticles-stabilized foam for enhanced oil recovery. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 164, 43–74 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Q.P. Nguyen, A.V. Alexandrov, P.L. Zitha, P.K. Currie, Experimental and modeling studies on foam in porous media: a review. Formation Damage \ldots (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Yu, C. An, D. Mo, N. Liu, R.L. Lee, Foam mobility control for nanoparticle-stabilized supercritical CO2 foam, in SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z.F. Zhang, V.L. Freedman, L. Zhong, Foam Transport in Porous Media-A Review (Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL), Richland, 2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. S.A. Farzaneh, M. Sohrabi, A review of the status of foam application in enhanced oil recovery, in EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition Incorporating SPE Europec, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Derikvand, M. Riazi, Experimental investigation of a novel foam formulation to improve foam quality. J. Mol. Liq. 224, 1311–1318 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Cuenca, E. Lacombe, M. Chabert, M. Morvan, E. Delamaide, Enhanced viscosity formulations for steam foam applications: impact on performances in bulk and porous media, in SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. B.P. Binks, Particles as surfactants—Similarities and differences. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 7(1–2), 21–41 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B.P. Binks, T.S. Horozov, Aqueous foams stabilized solely by silica nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44(24), 3722–3725 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Z.-G. Cui, Y.-Z. Cui, C.-F. Cui, Z. Chen, B. Binks, Aqueous foams stabilized by in situ surface activation of CaCO3 nanoparticles via adsorption of anionic surfactant. Langmuir 26(15), 12567–12574 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.A. Espinoza, F.M. Caldelas, K.P. Johnston, S.L. Bryant, C. Huh, Nanoparticle-stabilized supercritical CO2 foams for potential mobility control applications, in SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.F. Fakoya, S.N. Shah, Emergence of nanotechnology in the oil and gas industry: emphasis on the application of silica nanoparticles. Petroleum (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Guo, S. Aryana, An experimental investigation of nanoparticle-stabilized CO 2 foam used in enhanced oil recovery. Fuel 186, 430–442 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T.N. Hunter, R.J. Pugh, G.V. Franks, G.J. Jameson, The role of particles in stabilising foams and emulsions. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 137(2), 57–81 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Hurtado et al., Effects of surface acidity and polarity of SiO2 nanoparticles on the foam stabilization applied to natural gas flooding in tight gas-condensate reservoirs. Energy Fuel 32(5), 5824–5833 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Kaptay, On the equation of the maximum capillary pressure induced by solid particles to stabilize emulsions and foams and on the emulsion stability diagrams. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 282, 387–401 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Khajehpour, S.R. Etminan, J. Goldman, F. Wassmuth, S. Bryant, Nanoparticles as foam stabilizer for steam-foam process. SPE J. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Lee, H. Cho, J. Lee, C. Huh, K. Mohanty, Fly ash nanoparticles as a CO2 foam stabilizer. Powder Technol. 283, 77–84 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Singh, K.K. Mohanty, Nanoparticle-stabilized foams for high-temperature, high-salinity oil reservoirs, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. X. Sun, Y. Zhang, G. Chen, Z. Gai, Application of nanoparticles in enhanced oil recovery: a critical review of recent progress. Energies 10(3), 345 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. F.-Q. Tang, Z. Xiao, J.-A. Tang, L. Jiang, The effect of SiO2 particles upon stabilization of foam. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 131(2), 498–502 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Worthen, H. Bagaria, Y. Chen, S.L. Bryant, C. Huh, K.P. Johnston, Nanoparticle stabilized carbon dioxide in water foams for enhanced oil recovery, in SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. Yang, T. Wang, Z. Fan, Q. Miao, Z. Deng, Y. Zhu, Foams stabilized by in situ-modified nanoparticles and anionic surfactants for enhanced oil recovery. Energy Fuel 31(5), 4721–4730 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Yusuf, M. Manan, M. Jaafar, Aqueous foams stabilized by hydrophilic silica nanoparticles via in-situ physisorption of nonionic TX100 surfactant. Iran J. Energy Environ. (Special Issue on Nanotechnology) 4(1), 08–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Zargartalebi, N. Barati, R. Kharrat, Influences of hydrophilic and hydrophobic silica nanoparticles on anionic surfactant properties: Interfacial and adsorption behaviors. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 119, 36–43 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Panahpoori, B. Dehdari, M. Riazi, R. Parsaei, Visualization experiments on the impact of surfactant and nanoparticle on EOR potential of foam injection, in Saint Petersburg 2018, (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Kazemzadeh, M. Sharifi, M. Riazi, H. Rezvani, M. Tabaei, Potential effects of metal oxide/SiO2 nanocomposites in EOR processes at different pressures. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 559, 372–384 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Kazemzadeh, S. Shojaei, M. Riazi, M. Sharifi, Review on application of nanoparticles for EOR purposes; a critical of the opportunities and challenges. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. López et al., A novel design of silica-based completion nanofluids for heavy oil reservoirs. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 107483 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Y. Zhu, X. Pei, J. Jiang, Z. Cui, B.P. Binks, Responsive aqueous foams stabilized by silica nanoparticles hydrophobized in situ with a conventional surfactant. Langmuir 31(47), 12937–12943 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Z. Du, M.P. Bilbao-Montoya, B.P. Binks, E. Dickinson, R. Ettelaie, B.S. Murray, Outstanding stability of particle-stabilized bubbles. Langmuir 19(8), 3106–3108 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Zhang, P. Somasundaran, Advances in adsorption of surfactants and their mixtures at solid/solution interfaces. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 123, 213–229 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. N. Yekeen, M.A. Manan, A.K. Idris, A.M. Samin, A.R. Risal, Experimental investigation of minimization in surfactant adsorption and improvement in surfactant-foam stability in presence of silicon dioxide and aluminum oxide nanoparticles. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 159, 115–134 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. N. Yekeen, M.A. Manan, A.K. Idris, A.M. Samin, Influence of surfactant and electrolyte concentrations on surfactant adsorption and foaming characteristics. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 149, 612–622 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. B.P. Binks, M. Kirkland, J.A. Rodrigues, Origin of stabilisation of aqueous foams in nanoparticle–surfactant mixtures. Soft Matter 4(12), 2373–2382 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Q. Sun et al., Aqueous foam stabilized by partially hydrophobic nanoparticles in the presence of surfactant. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 471, 54–64 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Zhang, D. Sun, X. Dong, C. Li, J. Xu, Aqueous foams stabilized with particles and nonionic surfactants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 324(1–3), 1–8 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Li, Z. Li, P. Wang, Experimental study of the stabilization of CO2 foam by sodium dodecyl sulfate and hydrophobic nanoparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(5), 1243–1253 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Li, C. Qiao, Z. Li, S. Wanambwa, Properties of carbon dioxide foam stabilized by hydrophilic nanoparticles and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide. Energy Fuel 31(2), 1478–1488 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. F. AttarHamed, M. Zoveidavianpoor, M. Jalilavi, The incorporation of silica nanoparticle and alpha olefin sulphonate in aqueous CO2 foam: Investigation of foaming behavior and synergistic effect. Pet. Sci. Technol. 32(21), 2549–2558 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Bashir, A.S. Haddad, R. Rafati, Nanoparticle/polymer-enhanced alpha olefin sulfonate solution for foam generation in the presence of oil phase at high temperature conditions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 582, 123875 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. B. Wei et al., Investigation of synergism between surface-grafted nano-cellulose and surfactants in stabilized foam injection process. Fuel 211, 223–232 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. D.C. Boud, O.C. Holbrook, Gas drive oil recovery process. ed: Google Patents, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  45. A.T. Turta, A.K. Singhal, Field foam applications in enhanced oil recovery projects: screening and design aspects. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 41(10) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  46. T. Zhu, A. Strycker, C. Raible, K. Vineyard, Foams for mobility control and improved sweep efficiency in gas flooding, in SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. Farajzadeh, A. Andrianov, P. Zitha, Investigation of immiscible and miscible foam for enhancing oil recovery. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49(4), 1910–1919 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. R. Hahn, K. Spilker, D. Alexis, H. Linnemeyer, T. Malik, V. Dwarakanath, Low tension foam flooding for chemical enhanced oil recovery in heterogeneous systems, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  49. H. Alkan, A. Goktekin, A. Satman, A laboratory study of CO2-foam process for Bati Raman field, Turkey, in Middle East Oil Show, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. Nikolov, D. Wasan, D. Huang, The effect of oil on foam stability: mechanisms and implications for oil displacement by foam in porous media. Paper SPE 15443 presented at the 61st SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Los Angeles, 5–8 October. ed, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  51. S.A. Farzaneh, M. Sohrabi, Experimental investigation of CO2-foam stability improvement by alkaline in the presence of crude oil. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 94, 375–389 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. H. Wang, J. Chen, A study on the permeability and flow behavior of surfactant foam in unconsolidated media. Environ. Earth Sci. 68(2), 567–576 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. R. Singh, K.K. Mohanty, Synergistic stabilization of foams by a mixture of nanoparticles and surfactants, in SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. B.P. Binks, T.S. Horozov, Colloidal particles at liquid interfaces (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  55. F. Ravera, E. Santini, G. Loglio, M. Ferrari, L. Liggieri, Effect of nanoparticles on the interfacial properties of liquid/liquid and liquid/air surface layers. J. Phys. Chem. B 110(39), 19543–19551 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. T.S. Horozov, Foams and foam films stabilised by solid particles. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 13(3), 134–140 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Y. Hurtado, C.A. Franco, M. Riazi, F.B. Cortés, Improving the stability of nitrogen foams using silica nanoparticles coated with polyethylene glycol. J. Mol. Liq. 300, 112256 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. K.Y. Yoon, H.A. Son, S.K. Choi, J.W. Kim, W.M. Sung, H.T. Kim, Core flooding of complex nanoscale colloidal dispersions for enhanced oil recovery by in situ formation of stable oil-in-water pickering emulsions. Energy Fuel 30(4), 2628–2635 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. J. Yu, M. Khalil, N. Liu, R. Lee, Effect of particle hydrophobicity on CO2 foam generation and foam flow behavior in porous media. Fuel 126, 104–108 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Q. Liu, S. Zhang, D. Sun, J. Xu, Foams stabilized by Laponite nanoparticles and alkylammonium bromides with different alkyl chain lengths. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 355(1–3), 151–157 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. C.A. Franco, F.B. Cortés, N.N. Nassar, Adsorptive removal of oil spill from oil-in-fresh water emulsions by hydrophobic alumina nanoparticles functionalized with petroleum vacuum residue. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 425, 168–177 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. C.A. Franco-Ariza, J.D. Guzmán-Calle, F.B. Cortés-Correa, Adsorption and catalytic oxidation of asphaltenes in fumed silica nanoparticles: Effect of the surface acidity. Dyna 83(198), 171–179 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. S. Betancur, F. Carrasco-Marín, C.A. Franco, F.B. Cortés, Development of composite materials based on the interaction between nanoparticles and surfactants for application in chemical enhanced oil recovery. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57(37), 12367–12377 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. M.A. Abed, A. Saxena, H. Bohidar, Micellization of alpha-olefin sulfonate in aqueous solutions studied by turbidity, dynamic light scattering and viscosity measurements. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 233(1–3), 181–187 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. M. Baviere, B. Bazin, C. Noik, Surfactants for EOR: olefin sulfonate behavior at high temperature and hardness. SPE Reserv. Eng. 3(02), 597–603 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. J. Park, Y. Han, H. Kim, Formation of mesoporous materials from silica dissolved in various NaOH concentrations: Effect of pH and ionic strength. J. Nanomater. 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  67. S.-H. Wu, C.-Y. Mou, H.-P. Lin, Synthesis of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42(9), 3862–3875 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. R. Lim, P. Jiang, C. Gao, F. Huang, R. Xu, X. Chen, Experimental investigation of silica-based nanofluid enhanced oil recovery: the effect of wettability alteration. Energy Fuel 31(1), 188–197 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Q. Sun, Z. Li, S. Li, L. Jiang, J. Wang, P. Wang, Utilization of surfactant-stabilized foam for enhanced oil recovery by adding nanoparticles. Energy Fuel 28(4), 2384–2394 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. C. Wang, H.A. Li, Stability and mobility of foam generated by gas-solvent/surfactant mixtures under reservoir conditions. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 34, 366–375 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. R. Li, P. Jiang, C. Gao, F. Huang, R. Xu, X. Chen, Experimental investigation of silica-based nanofluid enhanced oil recovery: the effect of wettability alteration. Energy Fuels 31(1), 188–197 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. T. Lu, Z. Li, Y. Zhou, Flow behavior and displacement mechanisms of nanoparticle stabilized foam flooding for enhanced heavy oil recovery. Energies 10(4), 560 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. D. Mo, J. Yu, N. Liu, R.L. Lee, Study of the effect of different factors on nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam for mobility control, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge COLCIENCIAS, ANH, and Universidad Nacional de Colombia for their support provided through the agreement 272-2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Farid B. Cortés or Camilo A. Franco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hurtado, Y., López, D., Lopera, S.H., Cortés, F.B., Franco, C.A. (2021). Influence of Surfactant Adsorption on Surface-Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles for Gas Foam Stability. In: Nassar, N.N., Cortés, F.B., Franco, C.A. (eds) Nanoparticles: An Emerging Technology for Oil Production and Processing Applications. Lecture Notes in Nanoscale Science and Technology, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12051-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12051-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12050-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12051-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics