Measuring the Burden of Conflict Through Local Newspapers: Findings from the Manipur Micro-level Insurgency Events Database of 2008–2009

Part of the Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development book series (DTSD, volume 4)


The state of Manipur, located in the Northeastern region of India has witnessed an extremely complex insurgency as well as decades of civil strife beginning in the mid-1960s. There are currently 35 ethnically organized active armed groups present in the state. While violence occurs on an everyday basis no attempt was made to measure its direction, volume or intensity. As a consequence very little information exists on the civilian consequences of the insurgency, as the violence was assumed to be primarily between armed state and non-state actors. An attempt was therefore made to disaggregate data on incidences of insurgency related violence by creating a micro-level historical record of 2538 events for the years 2008–2009. The database was created by recording insurgency related events that were reported in Manipuri newspapers over a two-year period. The findings indicate that civilian non-combatants bear a disproportionate burden of the armed conflict in the state of Manipur, especially in terms of injuries. The data also reveals that a majority of civilian casualties occurred as a result of deliberate actions by “unknown” perpetrators. The database documents 1010 fatalities and 416 injury victims in the years of study, an estimate much higher than official records for the same years. The paper underscores the value of the systematic monitoring of all available local newspapers in conflict zones for reports on violence as a means of analyzing the societal burdens of violence. The paper argues that the monitoring of local media sources provide a useful mechanism for the monitoring of casualty data in regions experiencing protracted localized insurgencies; especially, where violence is underreported at the national and international level.


Northeastern India Manipur insurgency Casualty recording Casualty data Regional newspapers 


  1. Acharya, A., & Karp, A. (2011). India’s states of armed violence: Assessing the human cost and political priorities. Accessed 20 Mar 2013.
  2. Barron, P., & Sharpe, J. (2005). Counting conflicts: Using newspaper reports to understand violence in Indonesia (Social Development Paper No. 83). cent20Conference/Countingper cent20conflictsper cent20throughper cent20newspaper.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2010.
  3. Bundervoet, T. (2009). Livestock, land and political power: The 1993 killings in Burundi. Journal of Peace Research, 46(3), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centre for Development and Peace Studies (CDPS). (2010). Manipur outfits. Accessed 19 June 2010.
  5. Civil Society Coalition on Human Rights in Manipur. (2012). A memorandum on extrajudicial, arbitrary or summary executions. Imphal: Tubee Printers.Google Scholar
  6. Eck, K., & Hultman, L. (2007). One-sided violence against civilians in war: Insights from new fatality data. Journal of Peace Research, 44(2), 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandes, W., & Pereira, M. (Eds.). (2005). Land relations and ethnic conflicts: The case of Northeastern India. Guwahati: Northeastern Social Research Centre.Google Scholar
  8. Hanjabam, S. S. (2008). The Metei Upsurge in Manipur. Asian European Journal, 6, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hassan, M.S. (2006). Explaining Manipur’s breakdown and Manipur’s peace: The state and identities in Northeast India (Crisis States Programme Working Paper Number 79, 23). Accessed 1 Oct 2010.
  10. Hicks, M. H.-R., Dardagan, H., Bagnall, P. M., Spagat, M., & Sloboda, J. A. (2011). Casualties in civilians and coalition soldiers from suicide bombings in Iraq, 2003–10: A descriptive study. The Lancet, 378(9794), 906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Human Rights Watch. (2008). These fellows must be eliminated: Relentless violence and impunity in Manipur. Accessed 1 Apr 2011.
  12. Imphal Free Press. (2008, January 13). Four minor siblings hurt in Tamenlong Blast, p. 1.Google Scholar
  13. Jeyaseelan, L. (Ed.). (2008). Conflict mapping and peace processes in Northeast India. Guwahati: Northeastern Social Research Centre.Google Scholar
  14. Kalyvas, S. N. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kipgen, S. (2009). Land, identity and development: Perceptions focusing on the tribals of Manipur. In C. P. Singh (Ed.), Tribalism and the tragedy of the commons: Land, identity and development: The Manipur experience (pp. 329–359). New Delhi: Akanksha Press.Google Scholar
  16. Loitongbam, B. (2005). International Commission of Jurist eminent jurists panel: Terrorism, counter-terrorism and human rights: Northeast India Experience. Accessed 15 Dec 2010.
  17. Loitongbam, B. (2010). Manipur crisis: Blocked, divided and ruled. Accessed 30 May 2010.
  18. Mangattuthazhe, T. (2008). Violence and search for peace in Karbi Anglong. Guwahati: Northeastern Social Research Centre.Google Scholar
  19. Marwah, S., Sinha, S., Roy, N., & Tharaka, O. (2014). India country chapter. In C. Buchanan (Ed.), Gun violence, disability and recovery (pp. 251–270). Sydney: Surviving Gun Violence Project.Google Scholar
  20. Ministry of Home Affairs. (2012). Annual report for the year 2011–2012. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs.Google Scholar
  21. Paniagua, I., Crespin, E., Guardado, A., & Mauricio, A. (2005). Wounds caused by Firearms in El Salvador, 2003–2004: Epidemiological issues. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 21(3), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pradipkumar, K. H., Marak, F. K., Phom, M., & Momochand, K. (2005). Homicidal fatal firearm injuries. Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 27(4), 222–225.Google Scholar
  23. Restrepo, J. A., Spagat, M., & Vargas, J. F. (2006). The severity of the Colombian conflict: Cross-country datasets versus new micro-data. Journal of Peace Research, 43(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sinha, S., David, S., Gerdin, M., & Roy, N. (2013, April 24). Vulnerabilities of local healthcare providers in complex emergencies: Findings from the Manipur micro-level insurgency database 2008–2009. PLOS Currents Disasters, Edition 1. doi:  10.1371/currents.dis.397bcdc6602b84f9677fe49ee283def7
  25. South Asian Terrorism Portal (SATP). (2013). State wise datasheets. Accessed 20 Oct 2013.
  26. Takehllambam, B. (2009). Contesting space. Competing claims, shaping places: Violent conflicts and development in Manipur. In P. Priyoranjan Singh (Ed.), Tribalism and the tragedy of the commons: Land, identity and development: The Manipur experience (pp. 139–159). New Delhi: Akanksha Press.Google Scholar
  27. The Sangai Express. (2013). Medical supply chain to district hospitals cut off since 2009. Accessed 29 Oct 2013.
  28. Vadlamanatti, C. K. (2011). Why Indian men rebel? Explaining armed rebellion in the northeastern states of India, 1970–2007. Journal of Peace Research, 48(5), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verwimp, P. (2006). Machetes and firearms: The organization of Massacres in Rwanda. Journal of Peace Research, 43(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weinstein, J. M. (2007). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Williams, N. E., Ghimire, D. J., Axinn, W. G., Jennings, E. A., & Pradhan, M. S. (2012). A micro-level event centered approach to investigating armed conflict and population responses. Demography, 49(4), 1521–15246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Study of Political ViolenceJindal School of International AffairsSonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations