Polarity Detection of Online Reviews Using Sentiment Concepts: NCU IISR Team at ESWC-14 Challenge on Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis

  • Jay Kuan-Chieh Chung
  • Chi-En Wu
  • Richard Tzong-Han Tsai
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 475)

Abstract

In this paper, we present our system that participated in the Polarity Detection task, the elementary task in the ESWC-14 Challenge on Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis. In addition to traditional Bag-of-Words features, we also employ state-of-the-art Sentic API to extract concepts from documents to generate Bag-of-Sentiment-Concepts features. Our previous work SentiConceptNet serves as the reference concept-based sentiment knowledge base for concept-level sentiment analysis. Experimental results on our development set show that adding Bag-of-Sentiment-Concepts can improve the accuracy by 1.3 %, indicating the benefit of concept-level sentiment analysis. Our demo website is located at http://140.115.51.136:5000.

Keywords

Concept-level sentiment analysis Sentiment concepts Polarity detection of online reviews 

References

  1. 1.
    deHaaff, M.: Sentiment Analysis, Hard But Worth It!, customer THINK (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turney, P.D.: Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 417–424. Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, vol. 10, pp. 79–86. Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cambria, E., Hussain, A.: Sentic Computing: Techniques, Tools, and Applications. SpringerBriefs in Cognitive Computation, vol. 2. Springer, Holland (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsai, A., Tsai, R.T.-H., Hsu, J.Y.-j.: Building a concept-level sentiment dictionary based on commonsense knowledge. IEEE Intell. Syst. 28, 22–30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu, C.-E., Tsai, R.T.-H.: Using relation selection to improve value propagation in a ConceptNet-based sentiment dictionary. Knowl.-Based Syst. (2014, in Press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Speer, R., Havasi, C.: ConceptNet 5: a large semantic network for relational knowledge. In: Gurevych, I., Kim, J. (eds.) The People’s Web Meets NLP, pp. 161–176. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Affective norms for English words (ANEW): stimuli, instruction manual, and affective ratings (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cambria, E., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: SenticNet 2: a semantic and affective resource for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Youngblood, G.M., McCarthy, P.M. (eds.) FLAIRS Conference. AAAI Press (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rajagopal, D., Cambria, E., Olsher, D., Kwok, K.: A graph-based approach to commonsense concept extraction and semantic similarity detection. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web companion, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 565–570. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay Kuan-Chieh Chung
    • 3
  • Chi-En Wu
    • 2
  • Richard Tzong-Han Tsai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringNational Central UniversityJhongliTaiwan, R.O.C.
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, R.O.C.
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringYuan Ze UniversityJhongliTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations