Unsupervised Fine-Grained Sentiment Analysis System Using Lexicons and Concepts

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 475)

Abstract

Sentiment is mainly analyzed at a document, sentence or aspect level. Document or sentence levels could be too coarse since polar opinions can co-occur even within the same sentence. In aspect level sentiment analysis often opinion-bearing terms can convey polar sentiment in different contexts. Consider the following laptop review: “the big plus was a large screen but having a large battery made me change my mind,” where polar opinions co-occur in the same sentence, and the opinion term that describes the opinion targets (“large”) encodes polar sentiments: a positive for screen, and a negative for battery. To parse these differences, our approach is to identify opinions with respect to the specific opinion targets, while taking the context into account. Moreover, considering that there is a problem of obtaining an annotated training set in each context, our approach uses unlabeled data.

Keywords

Fine-grained sentiment analysis Opinion mining Lexicon 

References

  1. 1.
    Dave, K., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D.: Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 519−528, 20−24 May 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turney, P.D.: Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’02), pp. 417–424 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang, K., Yu, N., Zhang, H.: WIDIT in TREC 2007. Blog track: combining lexicon-based methods to detect opinionated blogs. In: Proceedings of TREC 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing, 2nd edn. (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu, R., Wong, K.F., Lu, Q., Xia, Y., Li, W.: Learning knowledge from relevant webpage for opinion analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Sydney, Australia, pp. 307–313, 9−12 December 2008Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agarwal, A., Biadsy, F., Mckeown, F.: Contextual phrase-level polarity analysis using lexical affect scoring and syntactic N-Grams. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 24–32 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Human Langugae Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. The Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 347–354 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qiu, G., Liu, B., Bu, J., Chen, C.: Opinion word expansion and target extraction through double propagation. Comput. Linguist. 37(1), 9–27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, H., Lu, Y., Zhai, C.: Latent aspect rating analysis on review text data: a rating regression approach. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 783−792. ACM, July 2010Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, H., Lu, Y., Zhai, C.: Latent aspect rating analysis without aspect keyword supervision. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 618−626. ACM, 2011 AugustGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kamps J., Marx, M., Mokken, R.J., De Rijke M.: Using WordNet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. In: Proceedings of LREC-04, 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, PT, vol. 4, pp. 1115–1118 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blair-Goldensohn, S., Hannan, K., McDonald, R., Neylon, T., Reis, G.A., Reynar, J.: Building a sentiment summarizer for local service reviews. In: WWW Workshop on NLP in the Information Explosion Era (NLPIX). ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qiu, G., Liu, B., Bu, J., Chen, C.: Expanding Domain Sentiment Lexicon through Double Propagation. In: IJCAI, vol. 9, pp. 1199–1204 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cambria, E., Olsher, D., Rajagopal, D.: SenticNet 3: A common and common-sense knowledge base for cognition-driven sentiment analysis. In: Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, June 2014Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Yang, P., Hussain, A., Durrani, T.: Merging SenticNet and WordNet-Affect emotion lists for sentiment analysis. In: 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), vol. 2, pp. 1251−1255. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poria, S., Agarwal, B., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Howard, N.: Dependency-based semantic parsing for concept-level text analysis. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8403, pp. 113–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poria, S., Cambria, E., Winterstein, G., Huang, G.-B.: Sentic patterns: dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowl.-Based Syst. (2014). doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.005
  18. 18.
    Poria, S., Cambria, E., Ku, L.-W., Gui, C., Gelbukh, A.: A Rule-based approach to aspect extraction from product reviews. In: COLING, Dublin (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ofek, N., Rokach, L., Mitra, P.: Methodology for Connecting nouns to their modifying adjectives. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8403, pp. 271–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ben-Gurion University of the NegevBeershebaIsrael

Personalised recommendations