Advertisement

The Inter-State Application Under the European Convention on Human Rights: More Than Diplomatic Protection

  • Isabella RisiniEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The International Court of Justice (ICJ), in a lesser known passage of the Barcelona Traction judgment, referred to the inter-State application under Article 33 (at the time ex-Article 24) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR, Convention) in these words:

Keywords

European Convention Fundamental Freedom Legislative Measure Administrative Practice Dispute Settlement Mechanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amerasinghe C (2004) Local remedies in international law, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Eustathiades C (1953–1955) La Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme et le Statut du Conseil de l’Europe. Die Friedenswarte 52:332–361Google Scholar
  3. Eustathiades C (1957) Les Recours Individuels a la Commission Européenne des Droits de l’Homme. In: Constantopoulos D et al (eds) Grundprobleme des Internationalen Rechts. Festschrift für Jean Spiropoulos, pp 111–137Google Scholar
  4. Harris D, O’Boyle M et al (2014) The law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Hold von Zürich P (1976) Die Staatenbeschwerde im Rahmen der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention – Rechtliche und Politische Probleme. Difo-Druck, BambergGoogle Scholar
  6. Kamminga M (1992) Inter-state accountability for violations of human rights. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Leckie S (1987–1988) The inter-state complaint procedure in international human rights law: hopeful prospects of wishful thinking? Hum Rights Q 10:249–303 (Johns Hopkins University Press)Google Scholar
  8. Nowak M (2005) U.N. Covenant on civil and political rights commentary. Engel Publisher, Kehl, Strasbourg, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Risini I (2014) An individual-centered decision seen in the historical and institutional context which led to Cyprus v. Turkey (IV)/The 2014 just satisfaction judgment of the European Court of human rights. Hum Rights Law J 34:18–36Google Scholar
  10. Risini I (2014) Eine Annäherung der primären und sekundären Pflichten aus der EMRK- Das Urteil des EGMR zur gerechten Entschädigung in der Staatenbeschwerde Zypern gegen Türkei (IV) von 2014. 41:602–611Google Scholar
  11. Simma B (1981) Fragen der zwischenstaatlichen Durchsetzung vertraglich vereinbarter Menschenrechte. In: von Münch I (ed) Festschrift für Hans-Jürgen Schlochauer zum 75. Geburtstag, de Gruyter, pp 635–648Google Scholar
  12. Simpson B (2001) Human rights and the end of the empire, Britain and the genesis of the European convention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Trinidade C (1978) L’epuisement des voies de recours internes dans les affaires inter-étatiques. Cahiers de droit européen – revue bimestrelle 14:139–157Google Scholar
  14. van Dijk P, van Hoof G (1998) Theory and practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. Vasak K (1974) Le Droit International des Droits de lHomme. In: Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, vol 140. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Boston, London, pp 335–415Google Scholar
  16. Villiger M (1999) Handbuch der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention (EMRK). Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der schweizerischen Rechtslage. Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  17. Villiger M (2010) The European Convention on Human Rights. In: Ulfstein G et al (eds) Making treaties work, human rights, environment and arms control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, pp 70–90Google Scholar
  18. Voeffray F (2004) L’Actio Popularis ou la Defense de l'Intérêt Collectif devant les Juridictions Internationales. Presses Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations