Advertisement

The Influence of Human Rights on Diplomatic Protection: Reviving an Old Instrument of Public International Law

  • Sebastian tho PeschEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Public international law has changed under the influence of human rights. This has also affected the law of diplomatic protection, an instrument that is similar to the notion of human rights. This chapter will examine how the rise of individual rights has affected the law of diplomatic protection and how this development has partly continued in municipal law. A special emphasis is put on the discretion of the state when exercising diplomatic protection over its citizens. Furthermore, by comparing the similarities of the two regimes, it is suggested to use diplomatic protection as a means of enforcing human rights.

Keywords

National Court Home State International Plane Optional Protocol Draft Article 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. De Vattel E (1758) Le Droit des Gens ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle. London (reprint published by the Carnegie Institution of Washington (1916), Gibson Bros., Washington)Google Scholar
  2. De Visscher C (1968) Theory and reality in public international law. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Dickson H (2010) Minimum standard. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. OUP, online edition, www.mpepil.com. Accessed 28 July 2014
  4. Dugard J (2009) Diplomatic protection. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. OUP, online edition, www.mpepil.com. Accessed 28 July 2014
  5. Erasmus G, Davidson L (2000) Do South Africans have a right to diplomatic protection? S Afr Yearb Int Law 25:113–130Google Scholar
  6. García Amador FV (1958) State responsibility. Some new problems. Recueil des cours 94:365–491Google Scholar
  7. Goodman R, Jinks D (2004) How to influence States: socialization and international human rights law. Duke Law J 54:621–703Google Scholar
  8. Klein N, Barry L (2007) A human rights perspective on diplomatic protection: David Hicks and his dual nationality. Am J Health Res 13:1–32Google Scholar
  9. Kolb A, Neumann T, Salomon TR (2011) Die Entführung deutscher Seeschiffe: Flaggenrecht, Strafanwendungsrecht und diplomatischer Schutz. Heidelberg J Int Law 71:191–246Google Scholar
  10. McGregor L (2010) Are declaratory orders appropriate for continuing human rights violations? The case of Khadr v. Canada. Hum Rights Law Rev 10:487–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meron T (2006) The humanization of international law. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  12. Milano E (2004) Diplomatic protection and human rights before the ICJ. Neth Yearb Int Law 35:85–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pergantis V (2006) Towards a humanization of diplomatic protection. Heidelberg J Int Law 66:251–397Google Scholar
  14. Pisillo Mazzeschi R (2009) Impact on the law of diplomatic protection. In: Kamminga MT, Scheinin M (eds) The impact of human rights law on general international law. OUP, Oxford, pp 211–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sicilianos L-I (2012) The human face of international law – interactions between general international law and human rights: an overview. Hum Rights Law J 32:1–11Google Scholar
  16. Touzé S (2007) La protection des droits des nationaux à l’étranger. Editions A. Perdone, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Vermeer-Künzli A (2007a) As if: the legal fiction in diplomatic protection. Eur J Int Law 18:37–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vermeer-Künzli A (2007b) The protection of individuals by means of diplomatic protection. Print Partners Ipskamp, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  19. Warbrick C (1988) Current legal problems: protection of nationals abroad. Int Comp Law Q 37:1002–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bucerius Law SchoolHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations