Abstract
There is great potential for volunteered geographic information (VGI) to augment data used for public health disease surveillance, in areas such as mass gatherings and qualitative GIS. The goal of this chapter is to explore these important issues of patient privacy, ethics, and liability, as they pertain to the use of VGI to augment health information exchanges (HIEs) in providing data for public health research programs. The current attention on health reform and HIEs provide professional geographers with an excellent opportunity to explore the contributions of VGI to this field. The chapter begins by briefly describing the legislation of patient privacy and protection in the United States, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. It also discuss the appropriate and inappropriate disclosures of protected health information (PHI). Next, it examines the ethical and legal issues surrounding the use of VGI in disease surveillance. Finally, the chapter will demonstrate that VGI yields tremendous value in providing sensitive and timely surveillance data when reliable and consistent communications between health care providers and regional health authorities are not possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 2:24–32
Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild MF (2013) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin
Goodchild MF, Glennon JA (2010) Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. Int J Digit Earth 3(3):231–241
Levental S (2012) A new geospatial services framework: how disaster preparedness efforts should integrate neogeography. J Map Geogr Lib 8(2):134–162
The Economist (2010) Dicing with data. The Economist online, 20 May 2010. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/16163396. Accessed 10 Nov 2013
Dunn C (2007) Participatory GIS – a people’s GIS? Prog Hum Geogr 31(5):616–637
McDougall K (2009) Volunteered geographic information for building SI. In: Ostendorf B, Baldock P, Bruce D, Burdett M, Corcoran P (eds) Proceedings of the Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute: biennial international conference, Adelaide 2009. Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute, Hobart, pp 645–653
Flanagin AJ, Metzger MJ (2008) The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 72:137–148
Lane J, Schur C (2010) Balancing access to health data and privacy: a review of the issues and approaches for the future. Health Serv Res 45(5 part 2):1456–1567
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Pub. L. 104–191 (Aug. 21, 1996).
American Statistical Association Open Letter on Proposed Changes to CMS Part D Public Use Files, 17 September 2008. Available at http://www.amstat.org/outreach/pdfs/CMSPartDPUF.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2013
Public Law 111–5 (2009) Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ5/pdf/PLAW-111publ5.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2013
PPACA Title XXXI, Section 3101
HITECH Act, 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164
Price PL (2012) Geography, me, and the IRB: from roadblock to resource. Prof Geogr 64(1):34–42
National Research Act of 1974, Title 45 CFR Part 46
Harvey F (2013) To volunteer or to contribute locational information? Towards truth in labeling for crowdsourced geographic information. In: Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild MF (eds) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–42
Google.org Flu Trends. Available at http://www.google.org/flutrends/about/how.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2013
Butler D (2013) When Google got flu wrong. Nat New 494:155–156
Scassa T (2013) Legal issues with volunteered geographic information. Can Geogr 57(1):1–10
Mooney P, Corcoran P, Ciepluch B (2013) The potential for using volunteered geographic information in pervasive health computing applications. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 4(6):731–745
Chandler JA, Levitt K (2011) Spatial data quality: the duty to warn users of risks associated using spatial data. Alberta Law Rev 49(1):79–106
Pew Research Center (2010) The future of online socializing. Available at http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1652/social-relations-online-experts-predict-future. Accessed 17 Nov 2013
Kar B, Crowsey RC, Zale JJ (2013) The myth of location privacy in the United States: surveyed attitude versus current practices. Prof Geogr 65(1):47–64
Acohido B (2011) Privacy implications of ubiquitous digital sensors. USA Today, 26 January 2011, P1B
Liptak A (2011) Court case asks if ‘Big Brother’ is spelled GPS. The New York Times, online. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/us/11gps.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2013
National Research Council. (2007) Putting people on the map: protecting confidentiality with linked social-spatial data. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
McCullagh D (2011) Microsoft’s web map exposes phone, PC locations. CNET. Available at http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20085028-281/microsofts-web-map-exposes-phone-pc-locations/. Accessed 17 Nov 2013
Brownstein J, Cassa C, Kohane I et al (2005) Reverse geocoding: concerns about patient confidentiality in the display of geospatial health data. In: AMIA annual symposium proceedings, Washington, DC, p 905
El Emam K, Brown A, AbdelMalik A et al (2010) A method for managing re-identification risk from small geographic areas in Canada. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 10:18
Chow TE, Lin Y, Chan WD (2011) The development of a web-based demographic data extraction tool for population monitoring. Trans GIS 15(4):479–494
Brownstein JS, Cassa CA, Kohane IS et al (2006) An unsupervised classification method for inferring original case locations from low-resolution disease maps. Int J Health Geogr 5:56. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-5-56
Churches T (2003) A proposed architecture and method of operation for improving the protection of privacy and confidentiality in disease registers. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:1
Bishr M, Kuhn W (2007) Geospatial information bottom-up: a matter of trust and semantics. In: Fabrikant SI, Wachowicz M (eds) Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 365–387. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72385-1_22
Bishr M, Mantelas L (2008) A trust and reputation model for filtering and classifying knowledge about urban growth. GeoJournal 72(3):229–237. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9182-4
Crosetto M (2001) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(5):415–437. doi:10.1080/13658810110053125
Conati C (2004) How to evaluate models of user affect? In: André E, Dybkjær L, Minker W, Heisterkamp P (eds) Affective dialogue systems, vol 3068. Springer, Berlin, pp 288–300. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24842- 2_30
Langley S, Messina J, Grady S (2013) Utilizing volunteered information for infectious disease surveillance. Int J Appl Geospatial Res 4(2):54–70
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blatt, A.J. (2015). Data Privacy and Ethical Uses of Volunteered Geographic Information. In: Health, Science, and Place. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12003-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12003-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12002-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12003-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)