Skip to main content

Data Privacy and Ethical Uses of Volunteered Geographic Information

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Geotechnologies and the Environment ((GEOTECH,volume 12))

Abstract

There is great potential for volunteered geographic information (VGI) to augment data used for public health disease surveillance, in areas such as mass gatherings and qualitative GIS. The goal of this chapter is to explore these important issues of patient privacy, ethics, and liability, as they pertain to the use of VGI to augment health information exchanges (HIEs) in providing data for public health research programs. The current attention on health reform and HIEs provide professional geographers with an excellent opportunity to explore the contributions of VGI to this field. The chapter begins by briefly describing the legislation of patient privacy and protection in the United States, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. It also discuss the appropriate and inappropriate disclosures of protected health information (PHI). Next, it examines the ethical and legal issues surrounding the use of VGI in disease surveillance. Finally, the chapter will demonstrate that VGI yields tremendous value in providing sensitive and timely surveillance data when reliable and consistent communications between health care providers and regional health authorities are not possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 2:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild MF (2013) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodchild MF, Glennon JA (2010) Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. Int J Digit Earth 3(3):231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levental S (2012) A new geospatial services framework: how disaster preparedness efforts should integrate neogeography. J Map Geogr Lib 8(2):134–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The Economist (2010) Dicing with data. The Economist online, 20 May 2010. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/16163396. Accessed 10 Nov 2013

  6. Dunn C (2007) Participatory GIS – a people’s GIS? Prog Hum Geogr 31(5):616–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McDougall K (2009) Volunteered geographic information for building SI. In: Ostendorf B, Baldock P, Bruce D, Burdett M, Corcoran P (eds) Proceedings of the Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute: biennial international conference, Adelaide 2009. Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute, Hobart, pp 645–653

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flanagin AJ, Metzger MJ (2008) The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 72:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lane J, Schur C (2010) Balancing access to health data and privacy: a review of the issues and approaches for the future. Health Serv Res 45(5 part 2):1456–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Pub. L. 104–191 (Aug. 21, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. American Statistical Association Open Letter on Proposed Changes to CMS Part D Public Use Files, 17 September 2008. Available at http://www.amstat.org/outreach/pdfs/CMSPartDPUF.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2013

  12. Public Law 111–5 (2009) Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ5/pdf/PLAW-111publ5.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2013

  13. PPACA Title XXXI, Section 3101

    Google Scholar 

  14. HITECH Act, 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164

    Google Scholar 

  15. Price PL (2012) Geography, me, and the IRB: from roadblock to resource. Prof Geogr 64(1):34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. National Research Act of 1974, Title 45 CFR Part 46

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harvey F (2013) To volunteer or to contribute locational information? Towards truth in labeling for crowdsourced geographic information. In: Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild MF (eds) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Google.org Flu Trends. Available at http://www.google.org/flutrends/about/how.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2013

  19. Butler D (2013) When Google got flu wrong. Nat New 494:155–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scassa T (2013) Legal issues with volunteered geographic information. Can Geogr 57(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mooney P, Corcoran P, Ciepluch B (2013) The potential for using volunteered geographic information in pervasive health computing applications. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 4(6):731–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chandler JA, Levitt K (2011) Spatial data quality: the duty to warn users of risks associated using spatial data. Alberta Law Rev 49(1):79–106

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pew Research Center (2010) The future of online socializing. Available at http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1652/social-relations-online-experts-predict-future. Accessed 17 Nov 2013

  24. Kar B, Crowsey RC, Zale JJ (2013) The myth of location privacy in the United States: surveyed attitude versus current practices. Prof Geogr 65(1):47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Acohido B (2011) Privacy implications of ubiquitous digital sensors. USA Today, 26 January 2011, P1B

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liptak A (2011) Court case asks if ‘Big Brother’ is spelled GPS. The New York Times, online. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/us/11gps.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2013

  27. National Research Council. (2007) Putting people on the map: protecting confidentiality with linked social-spatial data. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  28. McCullagh D (2011) Microsoft’s web map exposes phone, PC locations. CNET. Available at http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20085028-281/microsofts-web-map-exposes-phone-pc-locations/. Accessed 17 Nov 2013

  29. Brownstein J, Cassa C, Kohane I et al (2005) Reverse geocoding: concerns about patient confidentiality in the display of geospatial health data. In: AMIA annual symposium proceedings, Washington, DC, p 905

    Google Scholar 

  30. El Emam K, Brown A, AbdelMalik A et al (2010) A method for managing re-identification risk from small geographic areas in Canada. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 10:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chow TE, Lin Y, Chan WD (2011) The development of a web-based demographic data extraction tool for population monitoring. Trans GIS 15(4):479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brownstein JS, Cassa CA, Kohane IS et al (2006) An unsupervised classification method for inferring original case locations from low-resolution disease maps. Int J Health Geogr 5:56. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-5-56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Churches T (2003) A proposed architecture and method of operation for improving the protection of privacy and confidentiality in disease registers. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bishr M, Kuhn W (2007) Geospatial information bottom-up: a matter of trust and semantics. In: Fabrikant SI, Wachowicz M (eds) Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 365–387. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72385-1_22

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bishr M, Mantelas L (2008) A trust and reputation model for filtering and classifying knowledge about urban growth. GeoJournal 72(3):229–237. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9182-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Crosetto M (2001) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(5):415–437. doi:10.1080/13658810110053125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Conati C (2004) How to evaluate models of user affect? In: André E, Dybkjær L, Minker W, Heisterkamp P (eds) Affective dialogue systems, vol 3068. Springer, Berlin, pp 288–300. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24842- 2_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Langley S, Messina J, Grady S (2013) Utilizing volunteered information for infectious disease surveillance. Int J Appl Geospatial Res 4(2):54–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blatt, A.J. (2015). Data Privacy and Ethical Uses of Volunteered Geographic Information. In: Health, Science, and Place. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12003-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics