Advertisement

A Sociological Contribution to Understanding the Use of Robots in Schools: The Thymio Robot

  • Sabine Kradolfer
  • Simon Dubois
  • Fanny Riedo
  • Francesco Mondada
  • Farinaz Fassa
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8755)

Abstract

The Thymio II robot was designed to be used by teachers in their classrooms for a wide range of activities and at all levels of the curriculum, from very young children to the end of high school. Although the educationally oriented design of this innovative robot was successful and made it possible to distribute more than 800 Thymio robots in schools with a large majority in the French-speaking part of Switzerland, it was not sufficient to significantly raise the number of teachers using robot technology in their teaching after three years of commercialization. After an introduction and a first section on the design of this educational robot, this paper presents some results of a sociological analysis of the benefits and blockages identified by teachers in using robots, or not, with their pupils.

Keywords

Educational robot Thymio II curriculum school sociology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Turkle, S.: The Second Self. Simon and Schuster New York (1984)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education 58(3), 978–988 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jin, Y.-G., Chong, L., Cho, H.-K.: Designing a robotics-enhanced learning content for steam education. In: 2012 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), pp. 433–436 (November 2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    TTS Group: Bee-Bot (2011), http://www.beebot.org.uk
  6. 6.
    Balogh, R.: Educational robotic platform based on arduino. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Robotics in Education, RiE2010. FEI STU, Slovakia, pp. 119–122 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gross, M.D., Veitch, C.: Beyond top down: Designing with cubelets. Tecnologias, Sociedade e Conhecimento 1(1), 150–164 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Play-i, “Play-i: Delightful robots for children to program” (2014), https://www.play-i.com
  9. 9.
    Barobo, “Barobo, inc. - educational robotics.” (2014), http://www.barobo.com
  10. 10.
    Yu, X., Assaf, D., Wang, L., Iida, F.: Robotics education: A case study in soft-bodied locomotion. In: 2013 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), pp. 194–199 (November 2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Riedo, F., Rétornaz, P., Bergeron, L., Nyffeler, N., Mondada, F.: A two years informal learning experience using the thymio robot. In: Rueckert, U., Joaquin, S., Felix, W. (eds.) Advances in Autonomous Mini Robots, vol. 101, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Magnenat, S., Shin, J., Riedo, F., Siegwart, R., Ben-ari, M.: Teaching a Core CS Concept through Robotics. In: 19th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Magnenat, S., Riedo, F., Bonani, M., Mondada, F.: “A Programming Workshop using the Robot ”thymio ii”: The Effect on the Understanding by Children. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, pp. 24–29. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riedo, F., Chevalier, M.S.D., Magnenat, S., Mondada, F.: Thymio II, a robot that grows wiser with children. In: 2013 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), pp. 187–193. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fassa, F.: Société en mutation, école en transformation: le récit des ordinateurs. Éd. Payot, Lausanne, Switzerland (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burgeois, L.: Une cole vaudoise mise sur la tablette. 24 Heures (December 2, 2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weber, M.: From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Routledge (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaufmann, J.-C.: L’entretien compréhensif. Armand Colin (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beaud, S.: L’usage de l’entretien en sciences sociales. plaidoyer pour l’“entretien ethnographique. Politix 9(35), 226–257 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality. Doubleday, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vincent, G.: L’éducation prisonnière de la forme scolaire? Scolarisation et socialisation dans les sociétés industrielles. Presses Universitaires, Lyon (1994)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.C.: Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, vol. 4. Sage (1990)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Han, J., Kim, D.: r-learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot. In: 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 255–256. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Kradolfer
    • 1
  • Simon Dubois
    • 1
  • Fanny Riedo
    • 2
  • Francesco Mondada
    • 2
  • Farinaz Fassa
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculté des Sciences Sociales et PolitiquesUniversité de LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Systèmes RobotiquesEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations