The Backbone Decomposition for Spatially Dependent Supercritical Superprocesses

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 2123)

Abstract

Consider any supercritical Galton-Watson process which may become extinct with positive probability. It is a well-understood and intuitively obvious phenomenon that, on the survival set, the process may be pathwise decomposed into a stochastically ‘thinner’ Galton-Watson process, which almost surely survives and which is decorated with immigrants, at every time step, initiating independent copies of the original Galton-Watson process conditioned to become extinct. The thinner process is known as the backbone and characterizes the genealogical lines of descent of prolific individuals in the original process. Here, prolific means individuals who have at least one descendant in every subsequent generation to their ownn.

Starting with Evans and O’Connell (Can Math Bull 37:187–196, 1994), there exists a cluster of literature, (Engländer and Pinsky, Ann Probab 27:684–730, 1999; Salisbury and Verzani, Probab Theory Relat Fields 115:237–285, 1999; Duquesne and Winkel, Probab Theory Relat Fields 139:313–371, 2007; Berestycki, Kyprianou and Murillo-Salas, Stoch Proc Appl 121:1315–1331, 2011; Kyprianou and Ren, Stat Probab Lett 82:139–144, 2012),describing the analogue of this decomposition (the so-called backbone decomposition) for a variety of different classes of superprocesses and continuous-state branching processes. Note that the latter family of stochastic processes may be seen as the total mass process of superprocesses with non-spatially dependent branching mechanism.In this article we consolidate the aforementioned collection of results concerning backbone decompositions and describe a result for a general class of supercritical superprocesses with spatially dependent branching mechanisms. Our approach exposes the commonality and robustness of many of the existing arguments in the literature.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Berestycki, A.E. Kyprianou, A. Murillo-Salas, The prolific backbone decomposition for supercritical superdiffusions. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 121, 1315–1331 (2011)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Bertoin, J. Fontbona, S. Martínez, On prolific individuals in a continuous-state branching process. J. Appl. Probab. 45, 714–726 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Duquesne, M. Winkel, Growth of Lévy trees. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 139, 313–371 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.B. Dynkin, Markov Processes I (English translation) (Springer, Berlin, 1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.B. Dynkin, A probabilistic approach to one class of non-linear differential equations. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 89, 89–115 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.B. Dynkin, Superprocesses and partial differential equations. Ann. Probab. 21, 1185–1262 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.B. Dynkin, An Introduction to Branching Measure-Valued Processes. CRM Monograph Series, vol. 6 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1994), 134 pp.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.B. Dynkin, Branching exit Markov systems and superprocesses. Ann. Probab. 29, 1833–1858 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.B. Dynkin, Diffusions, Superprocesses and Partial Differential Equations. American Mathematical Society, Colloquium Publications, vol. 50 (Providence, Rhode Island, 2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.B. Dynkin, S.E. Kuznetsov, \(\mathbb{N}\)-measures for branching exit Markov systems and their applications to differential equations. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 130, 135–150 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Engländer, R.G. Pinsky, On the construction and support properties of measure-valued diffusions on \(D \subseteq R^{d}\) with spatially dependent branching. Ann. Probab. 27, 684–730 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.M. Etheridge, An Introduction to Superprocesses. University Lecture Series, vol. 20 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2000), 187 pp.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Etheridge, D.R.E. Williams, A decomposition of the (1 +β)-superprocess conditioned on survival. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 133A, 829–847 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S.N. Evans, Two representations of a superprocess. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 123A, 959–971 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.N. Evans, N. O’Connell, Weighted occupation time for branching particle systems and a representation for the supercritical superprocess. Can. Math. Bull. 37, 187–196 (1994)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P.J. Fitzsimmons, Construction and regularity of measure-valued Markov branching processes. Isr. J. Math. 63, 337–361 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Hardy, S.C. Harris, A spine approach to branching diffusions with applications to L p-convergence of martingales. Séminaire de Probab. XLII, 281–330 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Harris, The Theory of Branching Processes (Springer, Berlin; Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1964)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Ito, S. Watanabe, Transformation of Markov processes by multiplicative functionals. Ann. Inst. Fourier Grenobl 15, 13–30 (1965)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.E. Kyprianou, Y-X. Ren, Backbone decomposition for continuous-state branching processes with immigration. Stat. Probab. Lett. 82, 139–144 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J-F. Le Gall, Spatial Branching Processes, Random Snakes and Partial Differential Equations. Lectures in Mathematics (ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser, 1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Z. Li, Measure-Valued Branching Markov Processes. Probability and Its Applications (New York) (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), 350 pp.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Salisbury, J. Verzani, On the conditioned exit measures of super Brownian motion. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 115, 237–285 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Roelly-Coppoletta, A. Rouault, Processus de Dawson-Watanabe conditioné par le futur lointain. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Série I 309, 867–872 (1989)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.J. Sharpe, General Theory of Markov Processes (Academic Press, San Diego, 1988)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of BathBathUK
  2. 2.Department of Probability and StatisticsIIMAS, UNAMMexico, D.F.Mexico
  3. 3.LMAM School of Mathematical Sciences & Center for Statistical SciencePeking UniversityBeijingP. R. China

Personalised recommendations