Skip to main content

Customer Automatic Thinking and Store Choice

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Meanings for Marketing in a New Millennium

Abstract

We offer a two-step model of how customers select brands and shop at stores that they are familiar with: first, they focus on framing a shopping problem/opportunity. Second, they retrieve a few benefit-to-brand (or benefit-to-store) linkages relevant to the frame in their working memories. Such thinking and problem-solving is done automatically usually, without effort. Empirically, we demonstrate models of automatic customer benefit-to-store thoughts that explain store choice and similar models that explain store rejection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpert, M. I. (1971), “Identification of Determinant Attributes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 2, 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, J. N, (1968), “Attitude Measures that Predict Purchase.” Journal of Advertising Research, 8 (1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., (1966), “The Level of Consciousness: A Dynamic Approach to the Recall Technique”, Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (2), 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corstjens, M., and P. Doyle (1989), “Evaluating Alternative Retail Repositioning Strategies,” Marketing Science, 8, 2, 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauten, D. (1996), “Studying Obits for Businesses,” Sunday Advocate, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April 14, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., M. C Powell, and P. M. Herr (1983), “Toward a Process Model of the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Accessing One’s Attitude Upon Mere Observation of the Attitude Object,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 6, 723–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. (1986), “How do Attitudes Guide Behavior?” in R. M. Sorentino and E. T. Higgins (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundation of Social Behavior, New York: Guilford, 204–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., M. C. Powell, and C. J. Williams (1989), “The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16,4, 280–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulgoni, G. M., and G. J. Eskin (1983), “The BehaviorScan Research Facility for studying Retail Sopping Patterns,” in W. R. Darden and R. F. Lusch, Patronage Behavior and Retail Management, New York: North-Holland, 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. (1988), “Research in Consumer Behavior: Beyond Attitudes and Decision-making.‘European Research: The Journal of the European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research, 16, 5, 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. G. (1990), Kognitive Strukturen in der Konsumforschung, Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, R. L, and P. B. Case (1979), “Testing Thirteen Attitude Scales for Agreement and Brand Discrimination,” Journal of Marketing, 43,4, 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.J.S., and R. J. Lutz (1992), “Ask Not What the Brand Can Evoke; Ask What Can Evoke the Brand?” in: J. F. Sherry, Jr. and B. Sternthal (eds.) Advances in Consumer Behavior, 19, Provo, Utah: Association for Consumer Research, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.J.S. (1993), “Understanding Brand Awareness: Let Me Give You a C(l)ue,” in L. McAlister and M. L. Rothschild (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 20, Provo, Utah: Association for Consumer Research, 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, J. D. (1975), “Meaning of Image,” Journal of Retailing, 50,4, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, E. G. (1975), “Practical Applications of Recent Retail Image studies,” Journal of Retailing, 50,4, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (1995), Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, S., and M. A. Sewali (1987), “A Choice Sets Model of Retail Selection,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (2), 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E. M., and A. G. Woodside (1997), “What Evokes Brand or Store?” International Journal of Research on Marketing, 26 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigert, D. J., (1983), “Pushing the Hot Buttons for a Successful Retailing Strategy,” in W. R. Darden and R. F. Lusch, eds., Patronage Behavior and Retail Management, New York: North-Holland, 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G., and R. J. Trappey, III, (1992a), “Finding Out Why Customers Shop Your Store and Buy Your Brand: Automatic Cognitive Processing Models of Primary Choice,” Journal of Advertising Research, 32 (November), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A.G., and R. J. Trappey, III (1992b), “Incorporating Competition in Attidude Accessibility Models of Customers’ Primary Store Choice,” in William R. Darden and Robert F. Lusch, eds., The Cutting Edge, Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium on Patronage Behavior and Retail Strategy, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Woodside, A.G., Thelen, E.M., Brady, M. (2015). Customer Automatic Thinking and Store Choice. In: Moore, M., Moore, R. (eds) New Meanings for Marketing in a New Millennium. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11927-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics