Skip to main content

Competition and Co-operation in Maritime Logistics Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 220))

Abstract

This chapter aims to examine environmental challenges that maritime logistics operators have recently faced with, and to investigate strategic ways that maritime logistics operators can effectively manage competition and co-operation with their rivals for better responding to those challenges and thus achieving their strategic goals, i.e. maximisation of maritime logistics value. In order to address the aforementioned issues, this chapter adopts social network embeddedness and knowledge management perspectives. Based on the literature, a theoretical framework is established to show the positive relationship between co-opetitive networks, knowledge acquisition and maritime logistics value. A comprehensive survey to existing literature reveals that a high level of co-operation in a co-opetitive network (i.e., high numbers of and strong relationships between maritime logistics operators) facilitates knowledge acquisition, and competition promotes the positive impact of co-operation on knowledge acquisition. The acquired knowledge helps to improve maritime logistics value. This outcome will certainly provide maritime operators with a strategic insight into the identification of determinants and/or sources for competitive advantage and greater organisational performance from inter-organisational coordination and knowledge-based perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderton, P. (1999). Port management and operations, Lloyd’s practical shipping guides. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudin, M. (2004). Lean logistics: The nuts and bolts of delivering materials and goods. New York: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, S. M. H., Burr, C., & Johnsen, R. E. (2002). Competitor networks: International competitiveness through collaboration. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 8(5), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowersox, D. J. (1978). Logistics management: A systems integration of physical distribution management and material management. New York: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, P., Gooley, T., & Cooke, J. A. (1999). Forwarding industry poised to thrive. Logistics Management and Distribution, 38(8), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, A. E. (2007). Elements of shipping (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (2000). Sea change in liner shipping: Regulation and managerial decision-making in a global industry. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busan Port Authority. (2007). 2007 Port of Busan container Statistics. Busan: Busan Port Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2005). Logistics and supply chain management: Creating value-adding networks. New York: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Containerisation International. (February 2013a).London: A Lioyd’s List.

    Google Scholar 

  • Containerisation International (2013b). Top 100 ports 2013. London: A Lioyd’s List.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, J.J., Bardi, E.J., & Novack, R.A. (1999). Transportation. New York: South-Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza, G.A., Beresford, A.K.C., & Pettit S.J. (2003). Liner shipping companies and terminal operators: Internationalization or globalization? Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5(4), 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, E.G. (1982). Management and operations of american shipping. Boston: Auburn House Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremont, A. (2007). Global maritime networks, the case of Maersk. Journal of Transport Geography, 15 (4), 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1979). Exchange networks and community politics. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Logistics and Supply Chain Magazine. (2006). http://glscs.texterity.com/glscs/ 200606/?pg=60. Accessed 7 July 2009.

  • Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haasis, H. D. (2008). Knowledge management in intermodal logistics networks. In H. D. Haasis, H. J. Kreowski, & B. Sholz-Reither (Eds.), Dynamics in logistics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaver, T., Meersman, H., Moglia, F., & Van de Voorde, E. (2000). Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition? Maritime Policy and Management, 27(4), 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Fair Trade Commission. (2009). http://ftc.korea.kr/gonews/main.do. Accessed 3 July 2009.

  • Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action (pp. 216–239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Nalón, S. C. (1997). Competition, co-operation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 110–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K.-H., Ngai, E. W. T., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2002). Measures for evaluating supply chain performance in transport logistics. Transport Research Part E, 38(7), 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, L., Fan, C., Boile, M., & Theofanis, S. (2008). Collaborative vs. non-collaborative container-vessel scheduling. Transportation Research Part E, 44(3), 504–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E-S. (2010). Knowledge acquisition and maritime logistics value: An inter-organisational relationship perspective, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E-S., & Song, D-W. (2010). Knowledge management for maritime logistics value: Discussing conceptual issues. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(6), 563–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., & Calantone, R.J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2004). Coopetition in international business. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, P. B., & Paixao, A. C. (2003). Measuring lean ports performance. International Journal of Transport Management, 1(3), 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. R., & Daley, J. M. (2001). Profiling International Freight Forwarders: An Update. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics, 31(3), 152–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, J. (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E. (2004). Container shipping and ports: An Overview. Review of Network Economics, 3(2), 86–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E. (2006). The time factor in liner shipping services. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy and Management, 28(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Flores, B. E. (2002). The integration of manufacturing and marketing/sales decisions: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P. M. (2006). Maritime logistics and global supply chains: Towards a research agenda, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P. M., & Gray, R. (1999). An empirical assessment of relational competitive advantage in professional ship management. Maritime Policy and Management, 26(2). 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P. M., & Song, D.-W. (2008). Evaluating the integration of seaport container terminals in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(7), 562–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Brantley, P. (1992). Competitive cooperation on biotechnology: learning through networks? In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations (pp. 366–394). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roh, H. S., Lalwani, C. S., & Naim, M. M. (2007). Modelling a port logistics process using the structured analysis and design technique. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 10(3), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, A., & Walker, S. (2007). International logistics and supply chain outsourcing: From local to global. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, K. C., & Marlow, P. B. (2005). Logistics capability and performance in Taiwan’s major manufacturing firms. Transportation Research Part E, 41(3), 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, B., & Fremont, A. (2005). Transformation of port terminal operations: From the local to the global. Transport Reviews, 25(1), 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, D.-W. (2003). Port co-opetition in concept and practice. Maritime Policy and Management, 30(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song D-W., & Lee, E-S. (2012). Coopetitive networks, knowledge acquisition and maritime logistics value. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 15(1), 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management of Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “Coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2013). Review of maritime transport 2013. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, D. (2003). Logistics: An introduction to supply chain management. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2006). Port reform toolkit: Effective decision support policy markets and practitioners, Module 3. Washington: Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M., Droge, C., & Stank, T. P. (2001). The effects of logistics capabilities on firm performance: Customer-focused versus information-focused capabilities. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eon-Seong Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, ES., Song, DW. (2015). Competition and Co-operation in Maritime Logistics Operations. In: Lee, CY., Meng, Q. (eds) Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11891-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics