Skip to main content

Aaker’s Brand Personality Scale in a French Context: A Replication and a Preliminary Test of Its Validity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 2000 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

This article aims to replicate Aaker’s research on the dimensions of brand personality. Our study relies on a convenience sample and deals with twelve brands purchased in a French context. By means of principal components and confirmatory factor analyses, Aaker’s scale can be reduced in France to 33 items. Its structure is quite similar to the structure Aaker found in an American environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker J.L. 1997, “Dimensions of Brand Personality”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 3, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport G.W. 1937, Personality: A Psychological Interpretation, New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R.P. 1994, “Structural Equation Models in Marketing Research: Basic Principles”, in Principles of Marketing Research, edited by Bagozzi, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford: 317–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R.P. and Yi Y. 1988, “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, Sp, 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R.P. and Yi Y. 1994, “Advanced Topics in Structural Equation Models, in Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, edited by Bagozzi, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford: 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra R., Lehmann D.R. and Singh D. 1993, “The Brand Personality Component of Brand Goodwill: Some Antecedents and Consequences”, in Brand Equity and Advertising, edited by Aaker and Biel, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block J. 1995, “A Contrarian View of the Five-Factor Approach to Personality Description”, Psychological Bulletin, 117,2, 187–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K.A. 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York, Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell R.B. 1950, Personality: A Systematic Theoretical and Factual Study NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill G.A., Jr. 1979, “A Paradigm for Devel-oping Better Measures of Marketing Con-structs” Journal of Marketing Research,16

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa Jr. P.T. and McCrae R.R. 1998, “Trait Theories of Personality”, in Advanced Personality, edited by Barone, Hersen and Van Hasselt, Plenum Press, New-York, 103–121.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Digman J.M. 1990, “Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model”, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck H.J. 1960, The Structure of Human Personality, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C. and Larcker D.F. 1981, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg L.R. 1990, “An Alternative Description of Personality: The Big Five-Factor Structure”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John O.P. 1990, “The Big Five Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in the Natural Language and in Questionnaires”, in Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, ed by PERVIN, NY: Guilford Press, 66–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • John O.P., Donahue E. and Kentle R. 1991, The “BIG FIVE” Inventory: Versions 4a and 54, Institute of Personality and Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog K.G. 1971, “Statistical Analysis of Sets of Congeneric Tests”, Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus H.R. and Kitayama S. 1998, The Cultural Psychology of Personality, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 1, 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken G. 1989, “Who is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorse-ment Process”, Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 3, 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park B. 1986, “A Method for Studying the Development of Impressions of Real People”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 3, 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferrandi, JM., Valette-Florence, P., Fine-Falcy, S. (2015). Aaker’s Brand Personality Scale in a French Context: A Replication and a Preliminary Test of Its Validity. In: Spotts, H., Meadow, H. (eds) Proceedings of the 2000 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11885-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics