Skip to main content

A Typology of Market Windows and Antecedents of Firm Readiness in the Launching of Multiple Generations of New Products

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 2002 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

This paper develops a typology for market windows with the objective of providing insights on the proper timing of new product launches across multiple generations. The typology is based on the concepts of rhythms for a market's receptivity for new products as well as a firm's new product launch readiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Abell, Derek F. 1978. “Strategic Windows.” Journal of Marketing 42 (July): 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, Derrick S., Katherine N. Lemon and Richard Staelin. 2001. “The Impact of Firm Introductory Strategies on Consumers' Perceptions of Future Product Introductions and Purchase Decisions.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (2): 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M. and Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1994. “Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm.” Management Science 40 (February): 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. We 've Got Rhythm! Medtronic Corporation's Cardiac Pacemaker Business. HBS Case 9-698-004. Harvard Business School Publishing: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Shona L. Brown. 1998. “Time Pacing: Competing in Markets That Won't Stand Still.” Harvard Business Review 76 (March–April): 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Richard N. 1986. Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage. New York: Summit Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Jean-Marc Xuereb. 1997. “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (1): 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Abbie. 1997. “The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (February): 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, John Kao, and Fred Wiersema. 1997. Innovation: Breakthrough Thinking at 3M, DuPont, GE, Pfizer, and Rubbermaid. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya, Fahri and Michael J. Stahl. 1989. “Barriers to Entry and Market Entry Decisions in Consumer and Industrial Goods Markets.” Journal of Marketing 53 (April): 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Denis and Stanley F. Slater. 1999. “First, Fast, and On Time: The Path to Success. Or Is It?” Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (5): 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manton, Stan and Charles Tennant. 2000. “Product Development Performance.” Working Paper, Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom. February. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. 1958. Organizations, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Christopher M., Shelby Mclntyre and Murali Mantrala. 1993. “Toward Formalizing Fashion Theory” Journal of Marketing Research 30 (May): 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milson, Murray R., S.P. Raj, and David Wilemon. 1992. “A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development” Journal of Product Innovation Management 9: 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Will. 1991. “Dual Clocks: Entry Order Influences on Incumbent and Newcomer Market Share and Survival When Specialised Assets Retain Their Value.” Strategic Management Journal 12: 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Leslie Olin, Ruskin M. Morgan and William L. Moore. 2001. “Quality and Time-To-Market Trade-Offs When There Are Multiple Product Generations.” Working Paper, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • PDMA Visions. 1998. “Growth Forum: Identifying and Exploring Opportunities for Strategic Innovation.” Diana Laitner interviews with Kathleen Eisenhardt and Michael Tushman. 22 (3) July: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. Third Edition, Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. 1967. “Research and Development Resource Allocation Under Rivalry.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81 (3), August: 359–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalk, George, Jr. 1988. “Time—The Next Source of Competitive Advantage.” Harvard Business Review, 66 (July– August): 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. Competing Against Time: How Time-Based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Robert J. 1985. “Timing—The Key to Market Entry.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 2 (3), Summer: 77– 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. New Product Development: Managing and Forecasting for Strategic Success. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, James P., Daniel T. Jones, and Daniel Roos. 1985. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Russell. 1996. “Tangible Integration versus Intellectual Codification Skills: A Comparison of Logic and Memory ICs.” Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dacko, S.G., Furrer, O., Liu, B.SC., Sudharshan, D. (2015). A Typology of Market Windows and Antecedents of Firm Readiness in the Launching of Multiple Generations of New Products. In: Spotts, H. (eds) Proceedings of the 2002 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11882-6_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics