Skip to main content

Quantitative and Qualitative Rating and Ranking Studies for Consolidation of an Application Portfolio for Large Scale Pilots

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ambient Assisted Living

Part of the book series: Advanced Technologies and Societal Change ((ATSC))

  • 849 Accesses

Abstract

The ReAAL project intends to deploy a critical mass of Ambient Assisted Living applications and services for ca. 7,000 users in seven EU countries, based upon the universAAL platform, previously developed with EC support, with the intent of kick-starting the market for interoperable AAL services, applications and devices. ReAAL will facilitate the emergence of an AAL ecosystem by showing the platform usefulness, and spreading the related technical knowledge through an associated community of interest. Here, ReAAL will establish a multi-dimension evaluation methodology to measure the impact of the deployment of the AAL ecosystem in terms of the social, economic and health indicators. Whether health, safety, comfort, social integration or support of mobility—assistance might be needed in any possible aspect of daily life. From an investment point of view, the AAL market should allow individuals in danger of losing independence to pick the set of applications and services of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) over time in conjunction with actual needs, as they arise. Open platforms are supposed to be the enabler for such gradual system evolution and support products and services to become more affordable, future-proof, adaptable, and accessible. The ReAAL project investigates these assumptions via a number of pilots, each with a different focus. If the platform’s usefulness can be shown and the related technical knowledge is spread to an associated community of interest, a self-organizing AAL ecosystem will emerge, from which diverse stakeholders will benefit: application and technology vendors, service providers, public authorities and policy makers, sponsors, and the consumer masses, foremost those people who wish to be able to avoid dependency on nursing homes, preferring to continue to live independently in their own homes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mead, S.E., Lamson, N., Rogers, W.A.: Human factors guidelines for web site usability: health-oriented web sites for older adults. In: Morrell, R.W. (ed.) Older Adults, Health Information and the World Wide Web, p. 92. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Docampo Rama, M.: Technology generations handling complex user interfaces. Doctoral dissertation. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen, J.: How to conduct a heuristic evaluation. http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_evaluation.html Accessed 20 Nov 2008 (2005)

  4. Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd ed. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen, J.: Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In: Proceedings ACM CHI’92 Conference, pp. 373–380. Monterey, 3–7 May (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coats, R.B., Vlaeminke, I.: Man-Computer Interfaces: An Introduction to Software Design and Implementation. Blackwell Scientific Publications Inc., Cambridge, MA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37, 32–64 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI'90 Conference, pp. 249–256. Seattle, WA, 1–5 April (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nap, H.H.: Stress in senior computer interaction. Doctoral dissertation. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge support from the European Commission’s Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP). In particular, the work reported here has been supported by the ReAAL project (CIP-ICT-PSP.2012.3.2—Towards open and personalised solutions for active and independent living).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ad van Berlo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nap, H.H., van Berlo, A., Wichert, R. (2015). Quantitative and Qualitative Rating and Ranking Studies for Consolidation of an Application Portfolio for Large Scale Pilots. In: Wichert, R., Klausing, H. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. Advanced Technologies and Societal Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11866-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11866-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11865-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11866-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics