Explaining Mixture Models through Semantic Pattern Mining and Banded Matrix Visualization
Semi-automated data analysis is possible for the end user if data analysis processes are supported by easily accessible tools and methodologies for pattern/model construction, explanation, and exploration. The proposed three–part methodology for multiresolution 0–1 data analysis consists of data clustering with mixture models, extraction of rules from clusters, as well as data, cluster, and rule visualization using banded matrices. The results of the three-part process—clusters, rules from clusters, and banded structure of the data matrix—are finally merged in a unified visual banded matrix display. The incorporation of multiresolution data is enabled by the supporting ontology, describing the relationships between the different resolutions, which is used as background knowledge in the semantic pattern mining process of descriptive rule induction. The presented experimental use case highlights the usefulness of the proposed methodology for analyzing complex DNA copy number amplification data, studied in previous research, for which we provide new insights in terms of induced semantic patterns and cluster/pattern visualization.
KeywordsMixture Models Semantic Pattern Mining Pattern Visualization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Chen, C.-H., Hwu, H.-G., Jang, W.-J., Kao, C.-H., Tien, Y.-J., Tzeng, S., Wu, H.-M.: Matrix Visualization and Information Mining. In: Antoch, J. (ed.) COMPSTAT 2004 – Proceedings in Computational Statistics, pp. 85–100. Physica-Verlag HD (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Hand, D., Mannila, H., Smyth, P.: Principles of Data Mining. Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning Series. MIT Press (2001)Google Scholar
- 7.Hollmén, J., Seppänen, J.K., Mannila, H.: Mixture models and frequent sets: combining global and local methods for 0-1 data. In: Proceedings of the Third SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 289–293. Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2003)Google Scholar
- 11.McLachlan, G.J., Peel, D.: Finite mixture models. Probability and Statistics – Applied Probability and Statistics, vol. 299. Wiley (2000)Google Scholar
- 13.Myllykangas, S., Tikka, J., Böhling, T., Knuutila, S., Hollmén, J.: Classification of human cancers based on DNA copy number amplification modeling. BMC Medical Genomics 1(15) (May 2008)Google Scholar
- 15.Shaffer, L.G., Tommerup, N.: ISCN 2005: An Intl. System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (2005) Recommendations of the Intl. Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Karger (2005)Google Scholar
- 20.Vavpetič, A., Podpečan, V., Lavrač, N.: Semantic subgroup explanations. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (2013) (in press)Google Scholar