Academics and Service to the Community: An International (European) Perspective

  • Bojana ĆulumEmail author
Part of the The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective book series (CHAC, volume 13)


While teaching and research have been the focus of numerous studies, service activity has been highlighted less in the academic research. Presenting targeted data and results from two international collaborative research projects on academic profession ‒ The Changing Academic Profession (CAP) and The Academic Profession in Europe: Responses to Societal Challenges (EUROAC), this chapter provides insights and offers some reflections on the concept of ‘service’, thereby discussing (quantitative and qualitative) data collected in 12 European countries. Although many academics surveyed harbour positive views about the relevance of service activities, data reveals they spend around 3 h per week on various service activities, which is less than half of the time they allocate in administrative tasks. Academics are often involved in service activities related with serving academic and disciplinary community (e.g. scientific committees, reviewer, editor), some of them get engaged in community service, but very few get engaged in the political arena. As for their community engagement, two main categories arise: first one comprising of activities integrated within teaching and research, while the other consists of activities that come in addition to teaching and research. Academics engage more often in various outreach and short-term activities than in the long-term partnership activities/projects that could integrate their academic activities and roles. Such outreach activities organized by the institution come as a request from administration or superiors, and in addition to their regular work. Academics’ perceptions and experience reveal significant differences among countries in relation to institutional acknowledgment and evaluation of community engagement ‒ from formal recognition to a serious impediment of one’s academic progress. Substantial differences by country have to be taken into consideration in every aspect analyzed. However, this analysis of 12 European countries suggests that the traditional academic activities of teaching and research are clearly in the forefront of the academics’ values and activities, leaving the service function on the margin.


Community Engagement Civic Engagement Service Activity Public Engagement Academic Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Altbach, P. G., & Lewis, L. S. (1996). The academic profession in international perspective. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits from fourteen countries (pp. 3–48). Princeton: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Antonio, A. L., Astin, H. S., & Cress, C. M. (2000). Community service in higher education: A look at the nation’s faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arcury, T. A., Austin, C. K., Quandt, S. A., & Saavedra, R. M. (1999). Enhancing community participation in intervention research: Farmworkers and agricultural chemicals in North Carlina. Health Education and Behavior, 26, 563–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berberet, J. (1999). The professoriate and institutional citizenship: Toward a scholarship of service. Liberal Education, 85(4), 32–39.Google Scholar
  5. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bloomgarden, A. H., & O’Meara, K. A. (2007). Faculty role integration and community engagement: Harmony or cacophony? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13, 5–18.Google Scholar
  7. Bortagaray, I. (2009). Bridging university and society in Uruguay: Perceptions and expectations. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Boyer, E. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
  10. Braxton, J., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (Eds.). (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer’s four domains. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29.Google Scholar
  11. Bringle, R. G., Hatcher, J. A., & Clayton, P. H. (2006). The scholarship of civic engagement: Defining, documenting, and evaluating faculty work. To Improve the Academy, 25, 257–279.Google Scholar
  12. Butcher, J., Howard, P., Labone, E., & Bailey, M. (2003). Teacher education, community service learning, and student efficacy for CE. Asia Pacific Journal for Teacher Education, 31(2), 110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84, 7–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Checkoway, B. (2001). Renewing the civic mission of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, B. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Correa Bernardo, M. A., Butcher, J., & Howard, P. (2012). An international comparison of community engagement in higher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ćulum, B., & Ledić, J. (2010). Civilna misija sveučilišta: Element u tragovima. Rijeka: Filozofski falultet u Rijeci.Google Scholar
  18. Ćulum, B., & Ledić, J. (2012). Sveučilišni nastavnici i civilna misija sveučilišta. Rijeka: Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci.Google Scholar
  19. Ćulum, B., Rončević, N., & Ledić, J. (2013). The academic profession and the role of service function. In U. Teichler & E. A. Höhle (Eds.), Work situations, views and activities of the academic profession: Findings of a survey in twelve European countries (pp. 137–158). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Cummings, W. K. (1998). The service university movement in the US: Searching for momentum. Higher Education, 35(1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cummings, W. K. (2006). The third revolution of higher education: Becoming more relevant. In Reports of changing academic profession project workshop on quality, relevance and governance in the changing academia: International perspectives (COE publication series 20, pp. 209–222). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  22. De Weert, E. (2009). The organised contradictions of teaching and research: Reshaping the academic profession. In J. Enders & E. de Weert (Eds.), The changing face of academic life: Analytical and comparative perspectives (pp. 134–154). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  23. Garlick, S. C. (1998). Creative associations in special places: Enhancing the partnership role of universities in building competitive regional economies. Canberra: Dept. of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Higher Education Division.Google Scholar
  24. Goddard, J. B., & Chatterton, P. (2003). The response of universities to regional needs’. In F. Boekema, E. Kuypers, & R. Rutten (Eds.), Economic geography of higher education: Knowledge, infrastructure and learning regions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Göransson, B., Maharajh, R., & Schmoch, U. (2009). New activities of universities in transfer and extension: Multiple requirements and manifold solutions. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenbank, P. (2006). The academic’s role: The need for a re-evaluation? Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gregersen, B., Tved Linde, L., & Gulddahal Rasmussen, J. (2009). Linking between Danish universities and society. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunasekara, C. (2004). Universities and communities: A case study of change in the management of a university. Prometheus, 22(2), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harkavy, I. (2006). The Role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(1), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holland, B. (2001). Toward a definition and characterization of the engaged campus: Six cases. Metropolitan Universities, 12(3), 20–29.Google Scholar
  31. Hudson, Peter B., Craig, Robert F., & Hudson, Sue M. (2007). Benchmarking leadership in university-community engagement: First steps and future directions for a new regional university campus. Proceedings Australian Universities Community Engagement Alliance (AUCEA), Alice Springs, Northern Territory.Google Scholar
  32. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karlsson, J. (2007). Service as collaboration – an integrated process in teaching and research: A response to Greenbank. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karlsson, J., Booth, S., & Odenrick, P. (2007). Academics’ strategies and obstacles in achieving collaboration between universities and SMEs. Tertiary Education and Management, 13(3), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kennedy, B. D. (1997). Academic duty. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kogan, M., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2007). Key challenges to the academic profession (UNESCO forum on higher education, research and knowledge). Paris/Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research.Google Scholar
  37. Krücken, G., Meier, F., & Müller, A. (2009). Linkages to the society as “leisure time activities”? Experiences at German universities. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lynton, C. J. (1995). An indirect model of service-learning: Integrating research, teaching and community service. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2, 105–111.Google Scholar
  40. Macfarlane, B. (2005). Placing service in academic life. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relations between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 165–177). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Macfarlane, B. (2007). Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marek, K., & Antonowicz, D. (2013). Academic work, working conditions and job satisfaction. In U. Teichler & E. A. Höhle (Eds.), Work situations, views and activities of the academic profession: Findings of a survey in twelve European countries (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. SPRU, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  45. Ngoc Ca, T. (2009). Reaching out to society: Vietnamese universities in transition. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Meara, K. A. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Meara, K., & Braskamp, L. (2005). Aligning faculty reward system and development to promote faculty and student growth. NASPA Journal, 42(2), 223–240.Google Scholar
  48. OECD/IMHE. (1999). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  49. Ostrander, S. (2004). Democracy, civic participation, and the university: A comparative study of civic engagement on five universities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Persell, C., & Wenglinsky, H. (2004). For-profit post-secondary education and civic engagement. Higher Education, 47(3), 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rice, E. R., Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation, New pathways: Faculty careers and employment for the 21st century, inquiry #7. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  52. Schnaubelt, T., & Statham, A. (2007). Faculty perceptions of service as a model of scholarship. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14, 18–31.Google Scholar
  53. Shils, E. (1997). The calling of education: The academic ethic and other essays on higher education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shin, J. C. (2010). Scholarship of service: faculty perceptions, workloads and reward systems. In The changing Academic profession in international and quantitative perspectives: A focus on teaching and research activities (RIHE International Seminar Reports, 15, pp. 173–188). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  55. Singh, M., & Little, B. (2011). Learning and engagement dimensions of higher education in knowledge society discourses. In J. Brennan & T. Shah (Eds.), Higher education and society in changing times: Looking back and looking forward (pp. 36–44). London: The Open University. CHERI report.Google Scholar
  56. Star, C. (2007). Whither engagement? Challenges for community engagement within academia. In 2007 International Women’s Conference: Education, Employment and Everything… the Triple Layers of a Woman’s Life, 26–29 Sept 2007, Toowoomba, Queensland. Accessed 3 Apr 2010.
  57. Stephens, J. C., Hernandez, M. E., Roman, M., Graham, A. C., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thorn, C., & Soo, M. (2009). Latin American Universities and the third mission: Trends, challenges and policy options (World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 4002). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  59. Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  60. Vickers, M., Harris, C., & Mc Carthy, F. (2004). University community engagement exploring service learning options within practicum. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 29, No. 5). Hoboken: Jossey-Bass, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.Google Scholar
  62. Westfall, J. M., VanVorst, R. F., Main, D. S., & Herbert, C. (2006). Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolhuter, C. C., Higgs, P., & Higgs, L. G. (2006). The South African academic profession and the transformation of higher education. Higher Education Review, 38(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  64. Wynsberghe, R. V., & Andruske, C. L. (2007). Research in the service of co-learning: Sustainability and community engagement. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(1), 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia

Personalised recommendations