Advertisement

Teaching and Research in Binary Systems of Higher Education: Convergent or Distinctive Profiles?

  • Egbert de WeertEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective book series (CHAC, volume 13)

Abstract

Binary systems are based on a clear distinction between universities and the other higher education institutions focusing on professional education. It can be questioned whether such a sharp distinction still holds considering the research ambitions of the Universities of Applied Sciences in Europe. On the basis of outcomes of the survey on the international academic profession (CAP) this trend will further be explored especially regarding the extended tasks of UAS staff in carrying out applied and practice-oriented research. In the analysis the perceptions of academic staff on different positions and in different career stages will be taken into account. It is argued that the research at these institutions can be delineated from university research and constitutes a legitimate basis for sustaining the binary divide that tends to be supported and regulated by public policy.

Keywords

High Education System Institutional Type Research Function Research Profile Binary Divide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2012). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brennan, J., Locke, W., & Naidoo, R. (2007). United Kingdom: An increasingly differentiated profession. In W. Locke & U. Teichler (Eds.), The changing conditions for academic work and careers in selected countries (pp. 163–177). Kassel: INCHER–Kassel.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, B. R. (1978). Academic differentiation in national systems of higher education. Comparative Education Review, 22(2), 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Weert, E., & Soo, M. (2009). Research at universities of applied sciences in Europe: Conditions, achievements and perspectives. On the initiative of the European network for universities of applied sciences. (PDF available at www.uasnet.eu)
  5. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2006). Putting knowledge into practice: A broad–based innovation strategy for the EU. Brussels: European Commission (COM(2006) 502 final).Google Scholar
  7. Fulton, O., & Trow, M. (1974). Research activity in American higher education. Sociology of Education, 74(47), 29–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Schwartzman, S., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Kyvik, S., & Skodvin, O. (2003). Research in the non–university higher education sector – Tensions and dilemmas. Higher Education, 45, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lepori, B. (2008). Research in non–university higher education institutions: The case of the Swiss universities of applied sciences. Higher Education, 56, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  12. Morphew, C. C. (2002). A rose by any other name: Which colleges became universities. The Review of Higher Education, 25(2), 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morphew, C. C. (2009). Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of U.S. colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Musselin, C. (2009). Profession, market and organisation: How is academia regulated? In J. Enders & E. de Weert (Eds.), The changing face of academic life. Analytical and comparative perspectives (pp. 117–134). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Neave, G. (1983). The dynamics of integration in non-integrated systems of higher education in Western Europe. In H. Hermanns, U. Teichler, & H. Wasser (Eds.), The compleat university: Break from tradition in Germany, Sweden and the U.S.A. (pp. 263–277). Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Pestre, D. (2003). Regimes of knowledge production in society: Towards a more political and social reading. Minerva, 41, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva, 1(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pratt, J. (1997). The Polytechnic experiment 1965–1992. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rochford, F. (2006). Is there any clear idea of a university? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  21. Taylor, M. (2010). The master plan at 50: Greater than the sum of its parts – Coordinating higher education in California. Los Angeles: Legislative Analyst’ Office (LAO).Google Scholar
  22. Teichler, U. (1988). Changing patterns of the higher education system. The experience of three decades. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  23. Teichler, U. (2007). Higher education systems: Conceptual frameworks, comparative perspectives, empirical findings. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (2007). Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 769–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Damme, D. (2009). The search for transparency: Convergence and diversity in the Bologna process. In F. A. Van Vught (Ed.), Mapping the higher education landscape (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wissenschaftsrat. (2012). Recommendations on the differentiation of higher education institutions. Köln: Wissenschaftsrat.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CHEPSUniversity of TwenteEnschedeNetherlands

Personalised recommendations