Skip to main content

The Epistemics of “Personalized Medicine”. Rebranding Pharmacogenetics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Individualized Medicine

Part of the book series: Advances in Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine ((APPPM,volume 7))

Abstract

Whereas chapter 4 focuses on uses and normative claims of the rhetorical frame “Personalized Medicine” in medical and popular writings, chapter 5 analyzes the intellectual formation of pharmacogenetic, -genomics as a disciplinary field. It explores when, how, and why the leading journals in the field present themselves as part of the overall phenomenon labelled “Personalized Medicine”. Pharmacogenetic journals founded at the beginning of the twenty-first century, not only adopted the rhetorical framing of PM, but also branded pharmacogenomics as a milestone in medical history. Their vision extended to a large societal context that included not only pharmacology and genetics, but also broad movements of multiple stakeholders within society.

An analysis of past framings of pharmacological and genetic research centered on the epistemics of “individuality” or “variability” illustrates alternative conceptualizations of scientific progress in medicine. Three scholars exemplify these multifaceted developments: the clinician Archibald E. Garrod, the pharmacologist Werner Kalow and the biochemist Roger J. Williams. It is a history of survival or oblivion of scientific byways, detours and dead-ends that draws our attention to the fact that there was not a linear technological and scientific development that led to contemporary “Personalized Medicine”. Such an analysis sheds light not only on the question of what we gain but also on what we lose by framing specific research projects and traditions as “Personalized Medicine”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerknecht EH (1982) Diathesis: the word and the concept in medical history. Bull Hist Med 56(3):317–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1962) Medicine and genetics. New York Times 13 October:19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson W (1894) Material for the study of variation treated with special regard to discontinuity in the origin of species. Macmillian, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bearn AG, Miller ED (1979) Archibald Garrod and the development of the concept of inborn errors of metabolism. Bull Hist Med 53(3):315–328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard C (1878) Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux, vol 1. J.-B. Baillière et fils, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Borup M, Brown N, Konrad K et al (2006) The sociology of expectation in science and technology. Technol Anal Strateg 18(3/4):285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bud R (1993) The uses of life. A history of biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon WB (1932) The wisdom of the body. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawber TR (1980) The framingham study: the epidemiology of atherosclerotic disease. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foster MW, Sharp RR, Mulvihill JJ (2001) Pharmacogenetics, race, and ethnicity: social identities and individualized medical care. Ther Drug Monit 23(3):232–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fullwiley D (2007) The molecularization of race: institutionalizing racial difference in pharmacogenetics practice. Sci Cult 16(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod AE (1902) The incidence of Alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Lancet 160(4137):1616–1620. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)41972-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod AE (1909) Inborn errors of metabolism. Henry Frowde, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod AE (1923) Inborn errors of metabolism, 2 edn. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod AE (1996) The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Republished. Mol Med 2(3):274–282

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod AE (2002) The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Republished. Yale J Biol Med 75(4):221–231

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillère JP, Hess V (eds) (2013) Ways of regulating drugs in the 19th and 20th centuries. Palgrave Macmillian, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez FJ, Skoda RC, Kimura S et al (1988) Characterization of the common genetic defect in humans deficient in debrisoquine metabolism. Nature 331:442–446. doi:10.1038/331442a0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman I, Avidan N, Singer C et al (2007) Pharmacogenetics of glatiramer acetate therapy for multiple sclerosis reveals drug-response markers. Pharmacogen Genomics 17(8):657–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Idle JR, Gonzalez FJ (1991) Editorial. Pharmacogenetics 1:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DS (2013) How personalized medicine became genetic, and racial: Werner Kalow and the formations of pharmacogenetics. J Hist Med Allied Sci 68(1):1–48. doi:10.1093/jhmas/jrr046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juengst ET, Settersten RA, Fishman JR et al (2012) After the revolution? Ethical and social challenges in “personalized genomic medicine”. Per Med 9:429–439

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W (1962) Pharmacogenetics: heredity and the response to drugs. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W (1965) Contribution of hereditary factors to the response to drugs. Fed Proc 24(6):1259–1265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W, Tang BK, Kadar D et al (1979) A method for studying drug metabolism in populations: racial differences in amobarbital metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 26(6):766–776

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W (1982) Ethnic differences in drug metabolism. Clin Pharmacokinet 7:373–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W (2001a) Historical Aspects of Pharmacogenetics. In: Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W (2001b) Interethnic differences in drug response. In: Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 109–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W, Motulsky AG (2001) General conclusions and future directions. In: Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 389–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) (2001) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalow W (2006) Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: origin, status, and the hope for personalized medicine. Pharmacogenomics J 6:162–165. doi:10.1038/sj.tpj.6500361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy D (2007) Breakthrough of the year. Science 318(5858):1833. doi:10.1126/science.1154158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knox WE (1958) Sir Archibald Garrod’s “inborn errors of metabolism”. II. Alkaptonuria. Am J Hum Genet 10(2):95–124

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Licinio J (2001) Welcome to the pharmacogenomics journal. Pharmacogenomics 1(1):1–2. doi:10.1038/sj.tpj.6500019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Licinio J, Wong M (eds) (2002) Pharmacogenomics: the search for individualized therapies. Wiley VCH, Weinheim

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lillie EO, Patay P, Diamant J et al (2011) The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Per Med 8(2):161–173

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morley F (ed) (1958) Essays on individuality. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Motulsky AG (1957) Drug reactions enzymes, and biochemical genetics. J Am Med Assoc 165(7):835–837. doi:10.1001/jama.1957.72980250010016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motulsky AG (1967) Biochemical genetics in medicine. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 172:156–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motulsky AG (2002) From pharmacogenetics and ecogenetics to pharmacogenomics. Med Secoli 14(3):683–705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nebert DW, Zhang G, Vesell ES (2008) From human genetics and genomics to pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: past lessons, future directions. Drug Metab Rev 40(2):187–224

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul NW, Roses AD (2003) Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: recent developments, their clinical relevance and some ethical, social, and legal implications. J Mol Med 81(3):135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein W (2003) Public health and the risk factor: a history of an uneven medical revolution. University of Rochester Press, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck HM (1962) Heredity Linked to drug effects. New York Times 10 October:62

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreider E (1966) Typology and Biometrics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 134:789–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silber BM (2001) Pharmacogenomics, biomarkers, and the promise of personalized medicine. In: Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutton R (2012) Personalizing medicine: Futures present and past. Soc Sci Med 75(10):1721–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel F (1959) Moderne Probleme in der Humangenetik. Ergeb Inn Med Kinderheilkund 12:52–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RJ (1956) Biochemical individuality. The basis for the genetotrophic concept. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RJ (1958) Individuality and its significance in human life. In: Morley F (ed) Essays on individuality. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RJ (1967) You are extraordinary. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the the following people for their helpful comments and suggestions: Daniela Berner, Norbert W. Paul, Till van Rahden, Matthias Speidel and the members of the Department of Social Studies of Medicine at McGill University, especially Thomas Schlich.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Michl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michl, S. (2015). The Epistemics of “Personalized Medicine”. Rebranding Pharmacogenetics. In: Fischer, T., Langanke, M., Marschall, P., Michl, S. (eds) Individualized Medicine. Advances in Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11719-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11719-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11718-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11719-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics