Abstract
Whereas chapter 4 focuses on uses and normative claims of the rhetorical frame “Personalized Medicine” in medical and popular writings, chapter 5 analyzes the intellectual formation of pharmacogenetic, -genomics as a disciplinary field. It explores when, how, and why the leading journals in the field present themselves as part of the overall phenomenon labelled “Personalized Medicine”. Pharmacogenetic journals founded at the beginning of the twenty-first century, not only adopted the rhetorical framing of PM, but also branded pharmacogenomics as a milestone in medical history. Their vision extended to a large societal context that included not only pharmacology and genetics, but also broad movements of multiple stakeholders within society.
An analysis of past framings of pharmacological and genetic research centered on the epistemics of “individuality” or “variability” illustrates alternative conceptualizations of scientific progress in medicine. Three scholars exemplify these multifaceted developments: the clinician Archibald E. Garrod, the pharmacologist Werner Kalow and the biochemist Roger J. Williams. It is a history of survival or oblivion of scientific byways, detours and dead-ends that draws our attention to the fact that there was not a linear technological and scientific development that led to contemporary “Personalized Medicine”. Such an analysis sheds light not only on the question of what we gain but also on what we lose by framing specific research projects and traditions as “Personalized Medicine”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerknecht EH (1982) Diathesis: the word and the concept in medical history. Bull Hist Med 56(3):317–325
Anonymous (1962) Medicine and genetics. New York Times 13 October:19
Bateson W (1894) Material for the study of variation treated with special regard to discontinuity in the origin of species. Macmillian, London
Bearn AG, Miller ED (1979) Archibald Garrod and the development of the concept of inborn errors of metabolism. Bull Hist Med 53(3):315–328
Bernard C (1878) Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux, vol 1. J.-B. Baillière et fils, Paris
Borup M, Brown N, Konrad K et al (2006) The sociology of expectation in science and technology. Technol Anal Strateg 18(3/4):285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002
Bud R (1993) The uses of life. A history of biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cannon WB (1932) The wisdom of the body. W. W. Norton, New York
Dawber TR (1980) The framingham study: the epidemiology of atherosclerotic disease. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Foster MW, Sharp RR, Mulvihill JJ (2001) Pharmacogenetics, race, and ethnicity: social identities and individualized medical care. Ther Drug Monit 23(3):232–238
Fullwiley D (2007) The molecularization of race: institutionalizing racial difference in pharmacogenetics practice. Sci Cult 16(1):1–30
Garrod AE (1902) The incidence of Alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Lancet 160(4137):1616–1620. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)41972-6
Garrod AE (1909) Inborn errors of metabolism. Henry Frowde, London
Garrod AE (1923) Inborn errors of metabolism, 2 edn. Oxford University Press, London
Garrod AE (1996) The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Republished. Mol Med 2(3):274–282
Garrod AE (2002) The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Republished. Yale J Biol Med 75(4):221–231
Gaudillère JP, Hess V (eds) (2013) Ways of regulating drugs in the 19th and 20th centuries. Palgrave Macmillian, New York
Gonzalez FJ, Skoda RC, Kimura S et al (1988) Characterization of the common genetic defect in humans deficient in debrisoquine metabolism. Nature 331:442–446. doi:10.1038/331442a0
Grossman I, Avidan N, Singer C et al (2007) Pharmacogenetics of glatiramer acetate therapy for multiple sclerosis reveals drug-response markers. Pharmacogen Genomics 17(8):657–666
Idle JR, Gonzalez FJ (1991) Editorial. Pharmacogenetics 1:1
Jones DS (2013) How personalized medicine became genetic, and racial: Werner Kalow and the formations of pharmacogenetics. J Hist Med Allied Sci 68(1):1–48. doi:10.1093/jhmas/jrr046
Juengst ET, Settersten RA, Fishman JR et al (2012) After the revolution? Ethical and social challenges in “personalized genomic medicine”. Per Med 9:429–439
Kalow W (1962) Pharmacogenetics: heredity and the response to drugs. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia
Kalow W (1965) Contribution of hereditary factors to the response to drugs. Fed Proc 24(6):1259–1265
Kalow W, Tang BK, Kadar D et al (1979) A method for studying drug metabolism in populations: racial differences in amobarbital metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 26(6):766–776
Kalow W (1982) Ethnic differences in drug metabolism. Clin Pharmacokinet 7:373–400
Kalow W (2001a) Historical Aspects of Pharmacogenetics. In: Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–9
Kalow W (2001b) Interethnic differences in drug response. In: Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 109–134
Kalow W, Motulsky AG (2001) General conclusions and future directions. In: Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 389–395
Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) (2001) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York
Kalow W (2006) Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: origin, status, and the hope for personalized medicine. Pharmacogenomics J 6:162–165. doi:10.1038/sj.tpj.6500361
Kennedy D (2007) Breakthrough of the year. Science 318(5858):1833. doi:10.1126/science.1154158
Knox WE (1958) Sir Archibald Garrod’s “inborn errors of metabolism”. II. Alkaptonuria. Am J Hum Genet 10(2):95–124
Licinio J (2001) Welcome to the pharmacogenomics journal. Pharmacogenomics 1(1):1–2. doi:10.1038/sj.tpj.6500019
Licinio J, Wong M (eds) (2002) Pharmacogenomics: the search for individualized therapies. Wiley VCH, Weinheim
Lillie EO, Patay P, Diamant J et al (2011) The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Per Med 8(2):161–173
Morley F (ed) (1958) Essays on individuality. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
Motulsky AG (1957) Drug reactions enzymes, and biochemical genetics. J Am Med Assoc 165(7):835–837. doi:10.1001/jama.1957.72980250010016
Motulsky AG (1967) Biochemical genetics in medicine. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 172:156–169
Motulsky AG (2002) From pharmacogenetics and ecogenetics to pharmacogenomics. Med Secoli 14(3):683–705
Nebert DW, Zhang G, Vesell ES (2008) From human genetics and genomics to pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: past lessons, future directions. Drug Metab Rev 40(2):187–224
Paul NW, Roses AD (2003) Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: recent developments, their clinical relevance and some ethical, social, and legal implications. J Mol Med 81(3):135–140
Rothstein W (2003) Public health and the risk factor: a history of an uneven medical revolution. University of Rochester Press, Rochester
Schmeck HM (1962) Heredity Linked to drug effects. New York Times 10 October:62
Schreider E (1966) Typology and Biometrics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 134:789–803
Silber BM (2001) Pharmacogenomics, biomarkers, and the promise of personalized medicine. In: Kalow W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF (eds) Pharmacogenomics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 11–31
Tutton R (2012) Personalizing medicine: Futures present and past. Soc Sci Med 75(10):1721–1728
Vogel F (1959) Moderne Probleme in der Humangenetik. Ergeb Inn Med Kinderheilkund 12:52–125
Williams RJ (1956) Biochemical individuality. The basis for the genetotrophic concept. Wiley, New York
Williams RJ (1958) Individuality and its significance in human life. In: Morley F (ed) Essays on individuality. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 125–145
Williams RJ (1967) You are extraordinary. Random House, New York
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the the following people for their helpful comments and suggestions: Daniela Berner, Norbert W. Paul, Till van Rahden, Matthias Speidel and the members of the Department of Social Studies of Medicine at McGill University, especially Thomas Schlich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michl, S. (2015). The Epistemics of “Personalized Medicine”. Rebranding Pharmacogenetics. In: Fischer, T., Langanke, M., Marschall, P., Michl, S. (eds) Individualized Medicine. Advances in Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11719-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11719-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11718-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11719-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)