Abstract
An auction is a market mechanism which, by means of explicit rules, transfers market players' bids into an allocation of resources. An auction yields an unequivocal result as to which market player gets a specific object at which price. In network sectors auctions have considerable potential as allocation mechanisms for network services (e.g. providing bus services) and for the provision of network infrastructure capacities (e.g. take-off and landing slots on airports). In this context, auctions of public resources, for instance radio frequencies, on the basis of which network infrastructures can be built, are the best known examples. This chapter analyses the network-specific particularities of auctions in network industries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
This type of auction is called Dutch auction because it became famous in the Netherlands for auctions of tulip bulbs.
- 3.
A particular variant of the first-price sealed-bid auction, in which a successful bidder might, in the context of an invitation to tender, under certain conditions be permitted to withdraw his bid is called Swiss auction (cf. von Ungern-Sternberg, 1991).
- 4.
The term Vickrey Auktion goes back to William Vickrey, who wrote essential contributions to auction theory (e.g. Vickrey, 1961).
- 5.
For a more detailed and mathematical analysis the reader is referred to Lipczynski et al. (2005, pp. 389ff. and 704ff.).
- 6.
In the most favourable case the amount of the bid higher than his individual willingness to pay is irrelevant, because the second highest bid is not impacted by it.
- 7.
In the most favourable case the amount of the bid lower than his individual willingness to pay is irrelevant, because the second highest bid is not impacted by it.
- 8.
For the concept of price differentiation see Chap. 4.
- 9.
The role of universal services in network industries is discussed in Chap. 7.
- 10.
The role of market power regulation in network industries is analyzed in Chap. 8.
- 11.
For the role of auctioning of take-off and landing slots in the liberalisation of the aviation value chain see Knieps (2006, p. 22).
- 12.
For the problem of negative externalities due to interferences between adjacent frequencies and the resulting need to delimit the rights of operators to transmit signals which are interfering or might interfere as precondition for market transactions resulting in an optimal utilisation of rights see Coase (1959, pp. 25ff.).
References
Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., Pezanis-Christou, P., Rockenbach, B., Sadrieh, A., & Selten, R. (2005). An experimental test of design alternatives for the British 3G/UMTS auctions. European Economic Review, 49, 505–530.
Bekken, J.-T., Longva, F., Fearley, N., & Osland, O. (2006). Norwegian experience with tendered bus services. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 33, 29–40.
Cantillon, E., & Pesendorfer, M. (2006). Auctioning bus routes: The London experience. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Combinatorial auctioning (pp. 573–591). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Coase, R. H. (1959). The federal communications commission. Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 1–40.
Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (2006). Introduction to combinatorial auctions. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Combinatorial auctions (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Demsetz, H. (1968). Why regulate utilities? Journal of Law and Economics, 11, 55–65.
Demsetz, H. (1969). Information and efficiency: Another viewpoint. Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 1–22.
Klemperer, P. (2002). What really matters in auction design. Journal of Economic Perspective, 16(1), 169–189.
Klemperer, P. (2004). Auctions: Theory and practice. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Knieps, G. (2006). Delimiting regulatory needs. In OECD/ECMT Round Table 129, Transport services: The limits of (De)regulation, Paris, pp. 7–31.
Knieps, G. (2013). Competition and the railroads: A European perspective. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 9(1), 153–169.
Lipczynski, J., Wilson, J., & Goddard, J. (2005). Industrial organization (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
Lucking-Reiley, D. (2000). Vickrey auctions in practice: Nineteenth-century philately to twenty-first-century e-commerce. Journal of Economic Perspective, 14(3), 183–192.
McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(2), 699–738.
McMillan, J. (1994). Selling spectrum rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 145–162.
Milgrom, P. R. (1987). Auction theory. In T. F. Bewley (Hrsg.), Advances in economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nash, J. F. (1951). Non-cooperative games. Annuals of Mathematics, 54, 286–295.
Robinson, M. S. (1995). Collusion and the choice of auction. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 141–145.
Rothkopf, M. H., Teisberg, T. J., & Kahn, E. P. (1990). Why are Vickrey auctions rare? Journal of Political Economy, 98(1), 94–109.
Seifert, S., & Ehrhart, K.-M. (2005). Design of the 3G spectrum auctions in the UK and Germany: An experimental investigation. German Economic Review, 6(2), 229–248.
Ungern-Sternberg, T. von (1991). Swiss auctions. Economica, 58, 341–357.
Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate microeconomics (8th ed.). New York: Norton.
Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 8–37.
Wolfstetter, E. (1996). Auctions – An introduction. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10, 367–420.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knieps, G. (2015). Auctions. In: Network Economics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11695-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11695-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11694-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11695-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)