Skip to main content

Auctions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Network Economics

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 2900 Accesses

Abstract

An auction is a market mechanism which, by means of explicit rules, transfers market players' bids into an allocation of resources. An auction yields an unequivocal result as to which market player gets a specific object at which price. In network sectors auctions have considerable potential as allocation mechanisms for network services (e.g. providing bus services) and for the provision of network infrastructure capacities (e.g. take-off and landing slots on airports). In this context, auctions of public resources, for instance radio frequencies, on the basis of which network infrastructures can be built, are the best known examples. This chapter analyses the network-specific particularities of auctions in network industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A more detailed overview can be found e.g. in Klemperer (2004, pp. 9–72) and in Lipczynski et al. (2005, Chap. 11).

  2. 2.

    This type of auction is called Dutch auction because it became famous in the Netherlands for auctions of tulip bulbs.

  3. 3.

    A particular variant of the first-price sealed-bid auction, in which a successful bidder might, in the context of an invitation to tender, under certain conditions be permitted to withdraw his bid is called Swiss auction (cf. von Ungern-Sternberg, 1991).

  4. 4.

    The term Vickrey Auktion goes back to William Vickrey, who wrote essential contributions to auction theory (e.g. Vickrey, 1961).

  5. 5.

    For a more detailed and mathematical analysis the reader is referred to Lipczynski et al. (2005, pp. 389ff. and 704ff.).

  6. 6.

    In the most favourable case the amount of the bid higher than his individual willingness to pay is irrelevant, because the second highest bid is not impacted by it.

  7. 7.

    In the most favourable case the amount of the bid lower than his individual willingness to pay is irrelevant, because the second highest bid is not impacted by it.

  8. 8.

    For the concept of price differentiation see Chap. 4.

  9. 9.

    The role of universal services in network industries is discussed in Chap. 7.

  10. 10.

    The role of market power regulation in network industries is analyzed in Chap. 8.

  11. 11.

    For the role of auctioning of take-off and landing slots in the liberalisation of the aviation value chain see Knieps (2006, p. 22).

  12. 12.

    For the problem of negative externalities due to interferences between adjacent frequencies and the resulting need to delimit the rights of operators to transmit signals which are interfering or might interfere as precondition for market transactions resulting in an optimal utilisation of rights see Coase (1959, pp. 25ff.).

References

  • Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., Pezanis-Christou, P., Rockenbach, B., Sadrieh, A., & Selten, R. (2005). An experimental test of design alternatives for the British 3G/UMTS auctions. European Economic Review, 49, 505–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekken, J.-T., Longva, F., Fearley, N., & Osland, O. (2006). Norwegian experience with tendered bus services. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 33, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, E., & Pesendorfer, M. (2006). Auctioning bus routes: The London experience. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Combinatorial auctioning (pp. 573–591). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1959). The federal communications commission. Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (2006). Introduction to combinatorial auctions. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Combinatorial auctions (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1968). Why regulate utilities? Journal of Law and Economics, 11, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1969). Information and efficiency: Another viewpoint. Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (2002). What really matters in auction design. Journal of Economic Perspective, 16(1), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (2004). Auctions: Theory and practice. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knieps, G. (2006). Delimiting regulatory needs. In OECD/ECMT Round Table 129, Transport services: The limits of (De)regulation, Paris, pp. 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knieps, G. (2013). Competition and the railroads: A European perspective. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 9(1), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipczynski, J., Wilson, J., & Goddard, J. (2005). Industrial organization (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucking-Reiley, D. (2000). Vickrey auctions in practice: Nineteenth-century philately to twenty-first-century e-commerce. Journal of Economic Perspective, 14(3), 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(2), 699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. (1994). Selling spectrum rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R. (1987). Auction theory. In T. F. Bewley (Hrsg.), Advances in economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1951). Non-cooperative games. Annuals of Mathematics, 54, 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. S. (1995). Collusion and the choice of auction. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, M. H., Teisberg, T. J., & Kahn, E. P. (1990). Why are Vickrey auctions rare? Journal of Political Economy, 98(1), 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, S., & Ehrhart, K.-M. (2005). Design of the 3G spectrum auctions in the UK and Germany: An experimental investigation. German Economic Review, 6(2), 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungern-Sternberg, T. von (1991). Swiss auctions. Economica, 58, 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate microeconomics (8th ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter, E. (1996). Auctions – An introduction. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10, 367–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knieps, G. (2015). Auctions. In: Network Economics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11695-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics