Abstract
The majority of organisational issues still require mono-disciplinary solutions based upon deterministic models, but there is a significant number—the 20 % identified by the Pareto Principle (Koch, The 80/20 Principle: The secret to achieving more with less, 2011)—that needs alternative and potentially transdisciplinary approaches. Sense- making in such circumstances transcends the purely disciplinary models common to traditional problem solving and requires approaches that deliberately encompass alternatively perspectives and bodies of knowledge. In this chapter we explore some the inter-disciplinary concepts and frameworks being suggested in academic and practitioner arenas and consider what they may have to offer individuals and teams working on such complex issues in current ambiguous business environments.
We start by considering the nature of the issues confronting individuals and organisations and ask when an issue or problem is mono-, multi- or transdisciplinary. We then identify how the working process itself must be adapted to address such issues and become, itself, transdisciplinary and for that we need to consider how groups of people work on the issues. Finally we will consider how these groups can be supported and specifically how coaching of such groups must be specifically tuned to deal with them. By necessity, given the limited space here, this chapter is merely an overview of the issues to open discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bailey, Mark. (2010). Working at the edges. Networks, 11, 42–45.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative science quarterly 1–34.
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1995). Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16PF. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(6), 926–937.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1):5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5.
Hackman, J. G., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team Coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2):269–287.
Hadorn, G. H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zemp, E. (2008). The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In G. H. Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, & Elisabeth Zemp (eds), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 19–39). Netherlands: Springer.
Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2006). Coaching, mentoring and organizational consultancy: Supervision and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
IBM. (2011). Capitailising on complexity: Insights from the Global Chief Executive Officier Study. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03297usen/GBE03297USEN.PDF. Accessed 13 Feb. 2014.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2013). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
King, Gillian, Strachan, D., Tucker, M., Duwyn, B., Desserud, S., & Shillington, M. (2009). The application of a transdisciplinary model for early intervention services. Infants & Young Children, 22(3), 211–223. (210.1097/IYC.1090b1013e3181abe1091c1093).
Koch, R. (2011). The 80/20 principle: The secret to achieving more with less. LLC: Random House.
Leavy, P. (2011). Essentials of transdisicplinary research: Using problem-centred methodologies. Califormia: Left Coast Press.
Mâsse, L. C., Moser, R. P., Stokols, D., Taylor, B. K., Marcus, S. E., Morgan, G. D., Hall, K. L., Croyle, R. T., & Trochim, W. M. (2008). Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. American journal of preventive medicine, 35(2), S151–S160.
Mathieu, John, Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a Glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1992). Discriminant validity of NEO-PIR facet scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(1), 229–237.
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Peters, J., & Carr, C. (2013). Team coaching. DProf Report, Institute for Work Based Leaning, Middlesex University, UK.
Petrie, N. (2011). Furture trends in leadership development: Center for creative leadership. New Jersey: Wiley.
Schutz, Will. (1992). Beyond firo-B-three new theory-derived measures-element B: behavior, element F: feelings, element S: self. Psychological Reports, 70(3), 915–937.
Steinmetz, G. (2007). Transdisciplinarity as a nonimperial encounter: For an open sociology. Thesis Eleven, 91(1), 48–65. doi:10.1177/0725513607082002.
Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., & Moser, R. P. (2008). The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American journal of preventive medicine, 35(2), S77–S89.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. doi:10.1037/h0022100.
Wageman, R. (1997). Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams. Organisational Dynamics, 26(1), 49–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Collins, R., Fillery-Travis, A. (2015). Transdisciplinary Problems: The Teams Addressing them and their Support Through Team Coaching. In: Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Professional Learning and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11590-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11590-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11589-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11590-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)