Skip to main content

Transdisciplinary Problems: The Teams Addressing them and their Support Through Team Coaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The majority of organisational issues still require mono-disciplinary solutions based upon deterministic models, but there is a significant number—the 20 % identified by the Pareto Principle (Koch, The 80/20 Principle: The secret to achieving more with less, 2011)—that needs alternative and potentially transdisciplinary approaches. Sense- making in such circumstances transcends the purely disciplinary models common to traditional problem solving and requires approaches that deliberately encompass alternatively perspectives and bodies of knowledge. In this chapter we explore some the inter-disciplinary concepts and frameworks being suggested in academic and practitioner arenas and consider what they may have to offer individuals and teams working on such complex issues in current ambiguous business environments.

We start by considering the nature of the issues confronting individuals and organisations and ask when an issue or problem is mono-, multi- or transdisciplinary. We then identify how the working process itself must be adapted to address such issues and become, itself, transdisciplinary and for that we need to consider how groups of people work on the issues. Finally we will consider how these groups can be supported and specifically how coaching of such groups must be specifically tuned to deal with them. By necessity, given the limited space here, this chapter is merely an overview of the issues to open discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailey, Mark. (2010). Working at the edges. Networks, 11, 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative science quarterly 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1995). Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16PF. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(6), 926–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1):5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. G., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team Coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2):269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn, G. H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zemp, E. (2008). The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In G. H. Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, & Elisabeth Zemp (eds), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 19–39). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2006). Coaching, mentoring and organizational consultancy: Supervision and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM. (2011). Capitailising on complexity: Insights from the Global Chief Executive Officier Study. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03297usen/GBE03297USEN.PDF. Accessed 13 Feb. 2014.

  • Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2013). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gillian, Strachan, D., Tucker, M., Duwyn, B., Desserud, S., & Shillington, M. (2009). The application of a transdisciplinary model for early intervention services. Infants & Young Children, 22(3), 211–223. (210.1097/IYC.1090b1013e3181abe1091c1093).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, R. (2011). The 80/20 principle: The secret to achieving more with less. LLC: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2011). Essentials of transdisicplinary research: Using problem-centred methodologies. Califormia: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mâsse, L. C., Moser, R. P., Stokols, D., Taylor, B. K., Marcus, S. E., Morgan, G. D., Hall, K. L., Croyle, R. T., & Trochim, W. M. (2008). Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. American journal of preventive medicine, 35(2), S151–S160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, John, Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a Glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1992). Discriminant validity of NEO-PIR facet scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(1), 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J., & Carr, C. (2013). Team coaching. DProf Report, Institute for Work Based Leaning, Middlesex University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, N. (2011). Furture trends in leadership development: Center for creative leadership. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Will. (1992). Beyond firo-B-three new theory-derived measures-element B: behavior, element F: feelings, element S: self. Psychological Reports, 70(3), 915–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, G. (2007). Transdisciplinarity as a nonimperial encounter: For an open sociology. Thesis Eleven, 91(1), 48–65. doi:10.1177/0725513607082002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., & Moser, R. P. (2008). The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American journal of preventive medicine, 35(2), S77–S89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. doi:10.1037/h0022100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wageman, R. (1997). Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams. Organisational Dynamics, 26(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Collins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collins, R., Fillery-Travis, A. (2015). Transdisciplinary Problems: The Teams Addressing them and their Support Through Team Coaching. In: Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Professional Learning and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11590-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics