Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 36))

Abstract

Safety (S) improvement of industrial installations leans on the optimal allocation of designs that use equipment that is more reliable and testing and maintenance activities to assure a high level of reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) for their safety-related systems. However, this also requires assigning a certain amount of resources (C) that are usually limited. Therefore, the decision-maker in this context faces in general a multiple-objective optimization problem (MOP) based on RAMS+C criteria where the parameters of design, testing and maintenance act as decision variables. A general framework for such MOP based on RAMS+C criteria was proposed in [1]. There, a number of alternatives were proposed based on the use of a combination of RAMS+S formulation and Genetic Algorithms (GAs) based optimization to solve the problem of testing and maintenance optimization based only on system unavailablity and cost criteria. The results showed the capabilities and limitations of alternatives. Based on them, challenges were identified in this field and guidelines were provided for further research. In [2], a full scope application of RAMS+S based optimization using GAs was reported. Since then, the reliability and risk based optimization of design and operation of equipment and facilities has evolved into a set of technical documents, conference contributions and technical papers published elsewhere. Many of them have already addressed to some extent the effect of both random and epistemic uncertainties within this reliability and risk informed decision-making framework. This paper discusses the importance of appropriate formulation, treatment and analysis of model and parameter uncertainties in reliability and risk informed decision-making. It faces on how treatment and analysis of uncertainties should be integrated within an approach for evaluation of reliability and risk impact of safety issues, i.e. equipment design, operational requirements, etc. The approach would consist of modeling, assessment and analysis of the safety concern, which is intended to be used within an optimization context to support the decision-making on the most effective safety requirements. The paper focuses on Reliability and Risk of Nuclear Installations, where particular attention is paid to address the effect of uncertainties in the reliability and risk informed optimization of testing and maintenance of safety related equipment. Similar challenges can be observed for many other complex installations, such as energy generation and distributions, process industry, aeronautics, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Martorell S, Sánchez A, Carlos S, Serradell V (2004) Alternatives and challenges in optimizing industrial safety using genetic algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 86(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martorell S, Villanueva JF, Carlos S, Nebot Y, Sánchez A, Pitarch JL, Serradell V (2005) RAMS+C informed decision-making with application to multi-objective optimization of technical specifications and maintenance using genetic algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 87(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. RG 1.174 (2011) An approach for using probabilistic risk assessment in risk-informed decisions on plant-specific changes to the licensing basis, Revision 2, USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  4. NUREG 1855 (2009) Guidance on the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decisionmaking, Vol 1, USNRC (see also NUREG 1855 Draft Report, Revision 1, for Comment March 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. NUREG/CR-6141 (1995) Handbook of methods for risk-based analyses of technical specifications, USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  6. NUREG-0800 (2007) Review of risk information used to support permanent plant-specific changes to the licensing basis: general guidance, Section 19.2, USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  7. RG 1.177 (2011) An approach for plant-specific, risk-informed decision making: technical specifications, Revision 1, USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  8. RG 1.200 (2009) An approach for determining the technical adequacy of probabilistic risk assessment results for risk-informed activities, Revision 2, USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  9. RG 1.201 (2005) Guidance for categorizing structures, systems, and components in nuclear power plants according to their safety significance, Revision 1, USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cepin M (2005) Analysis of truncation limit in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 87:395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martorell S, Sánchez A, Carlos S (2007) A tolerance interval based approach to address uncertainty for RAMS+C optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92:408–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martorell S, Sánchez A, Villanueva JF, Carlos S, Serradell V (2008) A multi-objective genetic algorithm for RAMS+C optimization with uncertain decision variables. In: Proceedings of IMechE, Vol 222 Part O: J Risk Reliab. JRR140. IMechE 2008, pp 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martorell S, Villanueva JF, Nebot Y, Carlos S, Serradell V (2004) Current trends in risk-informed changes to limiting conditions for operation. In: Proceedings of 15th European safety and reliability conference (ESREL 2004), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sánchez A, Carlos S, Martorell S, Villanueva JF (2009) Addressing imperfect maintenance modelling uncertainty in unavailability and cost based optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith CL, Knudsen JK, Calley MB (1999) Calculating and addressing uncertainty for risk-based allowable outage times. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 66:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Volkanovski A, Cepin M (2011) Implication of PSA uncertainties on risk-informed decision making. Nucl Eng Des 241:1108–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. EPRI Report (2012) Practical guidance on the use of pra in risk-informed applications with a focus on the treatment of uncertainty. EPRI-1026511, Draft report, August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. EPRI-1016737 (2008) Treatment of parameter and model uncertainty for probabilistic risk assessments. EPRI, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martorell S, Villamizar M, Villanueva JF, Carlos S, Sanchez AI (2010) Risk-informed decision-making on changes to allowed outage times addressing uncertainties. In: Proceedings of European safety and reliability conference (ESREL 2010), pp 2278–2286

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martorell S, Villamizar M, Villanueva JF, Carlos S, Sanchez AI (2011) Importance analysis in risk-informed decision-making of changes to allowed outage times addressing uncertainties. In: Proceedings of European safety and reliability conference (ESREL 2011), pp 2143–2151

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martorell S, Villamizar M, Villanueva JF, Serradell V, Sanchez AI (2009) Addressing uncertainties in risk-informed decision-making of changes to nuclear power plant technical specifications. In: Proceedings of European safety and reliability conference (ESREL 2009), pp 353–359

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim IS, Martorell S, Vesely WE, Samanta PK (1992) Quantitative evaluation of surveillance test intervals including test-caused risks. NUREG/CR-5775, BNLNUREG-52296, Feburary 1992

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim IS, Martorell SA, Vesely WE, Samanta PK (1994) Risk analysis of surveillance requirements including their adverse effects. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 45(3):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aven T (2010) On the use of uncertainty importance measures in reliability and risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(2010):127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Borgonovo E, Apostolakis GE, Tarantola S, Saltelli A (2003) Comparison of global sensitivity analysis techniques and importance measures in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79(2):175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Torres-Echeverria AC, Martorell S, Thompson HA (2009) Modelling and optimization of proof testing policies for safety instrumented systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(4):838–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. International Electrotechnical Commission (1998–2005) IEC 61508. Functional safety of electri-cal/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems. Parts 1–7. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  28. International Electrotechnical Commission (2003) IEC 61511 Functional safety–safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector. Parts 1–3. Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reinert JM, Apostolakis GE (2006) Including model uncertainty in risk-informed decision making. Ann Nucl Energy 33:354–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Villanueva JF, Sanchez AI, Carlos S, Martorell S (2008) Genetic algorithm-based optimization of testing and maintenance under uncertain unavailability and cost estimation: a survey of strategies for harmonizing evolution and accuracy. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(12):1830–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for the financial support of this work (Research Project ENE2010-17449).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Martorell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martorell, S., Villamizar, M., Martón, I., Sánchez, A., Carlos, S. (2015). New Challenges and Opportunities in Reliability and Risk Based Optimization. In: Greiner, D., Galván, B., Périaux, J., Gauger, N., Giannakoglou, K., Winter, G. (eds) Advances in Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design, Optimization and Control in Engineering and Sciences. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11541-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11541-2_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11540-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11541-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics