Skip to main content

China’s Reforestation and Rural Development Programs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China’s Grain for Green Program

Abstract

This chapter describes the six largest programs introduced during the late 1990s and early 2000s. Together, these six Key Forestry Programs (KFPs) cover 97 % of China’s counties and target over 100 million ha of land for forestation. The Grain for Green is the largest of these programs, in terms of area covered, people affected, and money invested. This book only reviews the Grain for Green, but in many villages more than one program was introduced concurrently. In this chapter, we argue that the government introduced the KFPs not only because environmental deterioration had reached a critical point, but also because China was producing a surplus of grain, which lowered farmers’ incomes, and because inequality between the eastern and western provinces was reaching a critical point. The Grain for Green in particular addressed all these problems concurrently, through direct payments to poor farmers willing to set aside marginal land. Partly for this reason, the Grain for Green is considered by many as the best reforestation and rural development program ever undertaken in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These official figures have to be taken with a pinch of salt. Until 1994 the canopy density had to be over 30 % for a vegetated area to be considered a forest, while from 1994 onwards a canopy density of 20 % was sufficient. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the forest cover has considerably increased with the six KFPs.

  2. 2.

    The program is set to end 16 years after it initially started. It started at different times in different areas, but in most places it is expected to end in 2016–2019.

  3. 3.

    When considering these changes, one should bear in mind that until 1994, the canopy density had to be over 30 % for a vegetated area to be considered a forest, while from 1994 onwards a canopy density of 20 % was sufficient.

  4. 4.

    三农”问题

  5. 5.

    In 2000, the government started the financial reforms for agricultural products (which covered the whole national territory only in 2006). Through this reform, taxes on agricultural products, including trees and timber, were abolished. Since 2007, farmers in China no longer have to pay taxes or fees for agricultural or non-timber forest products, though they still pay limited fees for timber.

References

  • Bennett, M. T. (2008). China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics, 65(4), 699–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. B. (2010). State, market and life chances: Evidence from rural Guangdong China (1978–2004). Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. H., & Shou, X. L. (2001). China s environmental diplomacy: Historical transitions and current challenges. China Population, Resources and Environment, 11(4), 52–56 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delang, C. O., & Wang, W. (2013). Chinese forest policy reforms after 1998: The case of the Natural Forest Protection Program and Slope Land Conversion Program. International Forestry Review, 15(3), 290–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. (2000). Land degradation in China: Erosion and salinity component (CCAP Working Paper WP-00-E17). Beijing: Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, J. (2002). China’s implementation of Six Key Forestry Programs. N.P. http://www.china.org.cn/e-news/news02-05-14.htm. Accessed 10 Nov 2013.

  • Lei, J., & Zhu, L. (2002). China’s implementation of Six Key Forestry Programs. China Tibet Information Center/State Forestry Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. (2001). Conserving natural forests in China: Historical perspective and strategic measures (Working Report). Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (2004b). Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China. Forest Ecology and Management, 201(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. (2009a). China’s agricultural tax history. Beijing: State Administration of Taxation. http://www.ctax.org.cn/news/rdzt/ctax60/item/item2_7.html. Accessed 5 Oct 2013 (in Chinese).

  • Li, S., & Zhai, H. (2002). 世界林业生态工程对比研究 [The comparison study on forestry ecological projects in the world]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22, 1976–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Liu, A., Zou, C., Xu, W., Shimizu, H., & Wang, K. Y. (2012). An overview of the “Three-North” Shelterbelt project in China. Forestry Studies in China, 14(1), 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Diamond, J. (2005, June 30) China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 435, 1179–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C., & Chen, X. (2008). Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28), 9477–9482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Lu, J. Z., & Yin, R. S. (2010). An estimation of the effects of China’s Priority Forestry Programs on-farmers’ income. Environmental Management, 45(3), 526–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. H. (2011). International convention related to China’s forestry. Forestry of Guangxi, 2011(4), 53 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W., Landell-Mills, N., Liu, J., Xu, J., & Liu, C. (2002). Getting the private sector to work for the public good – Instruments for sustainable private sector forestry in China. Instruments for sustainable private sector forestry series. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Y. S., Zhao, N., & Yang, X. J. (2013). Food security and farm land protection in China. World Scientific Pub. p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (1996–2012). Chinese statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Development and Reform Commission. (2008). Report on the implementation of the 2007 Plan for National Economic and Social Development and on the 2008 Draft Plan for National Economic and Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBS. (2004). National bureau of statistics of China rural economic and social investigation team (China Rural Poverty Monitoring Report 2004). Beijing: China Statistical Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. (2000). Natural causes: Essays in ecological Marxism (Chinese translation by Z. D. Tang & P. H. Zang). Nanjing: Nanjing University Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (1993). Afforestation in China. In A. Mather (Ed.), Afforestation: Policies, planning and progress. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanturf, J. A., Madsen, P., & Lamb, D. (2012). A goal-oriented approach to forest landscape restoration. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., & Liqiao, C. (2006). A study of policies and legislation affecting payments for watershed services in China. Beijing/London: Research Center of Ecological and Environmental Economics/International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Administration Centre for China’s Agenda 21. (1994). China’s Agenda 21-white paper on China’s population, environment and development in the 21st century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. Y. (2008). The rural reform and rural social changes. In Q. Li (Ed.), Social changes in China, 1978–2008 (pp. 57–89). Beijing: Social Science Academic Press, Chapter 3 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., & Delang, C. O. (2011). Chinese forest policies in the age of ideology (1949–1977). International Forestry Review, 13(4), 416–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., Innes, J. L., Lei, J., Dai, S., & Wu, S. W. (2007a). China’s forestry reforms. Science, 318(5856), 1556–1557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenhua, L. (2004). Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China. Forest Ecology and Management, 201(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2001). China air, land, and water: Environmental priorities for a new millennium. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund and State Forest Administration. (2003). Case studies of China’s grain-for-green Policy. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., Zhang, Z., & Tang, L. (2007). Chapter 2: Forest rehabilitation in mainland China. In D. K. Lee (Ed.), Keep Asia Green volume II “Northeast Asia”. Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi, W., Bi, H., & He, B. (2012). Chapter 4: Forest landscape restoration in China. In W. Xi, H. Bi, & B. He (Eds.), Forest landscape restoration in China. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, W., Dai, G., & Zhang, S. (2010, September 13–17). China’s strategy and financing for forestry sustainable development. Paper presented at the first meeting of the ad hoc expert group on forest financing, Nairobi. UN Forum on Forests Secretariat. http://www.un.org/esa/forests/pdf/aheg/aheg1/China_case_study.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Xu, J. T., & Cao, Y. Y. (2002). 退耕还林还草的可持续发展问题 [Sustainability of Green for Green Program) (in Chinese]. International Economic Review, Z2, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Yin, R., Li, Z., & Liu, C. (2006a). China’s ecological rehabilitation: Unprecedented efforts, dramatic impacts, and requisite policies. Ecological Economics, 57(4), 595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (1994). Cultivated land soil and water loss and control measures in China. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 14(2), 32–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. S, Xu, J. T., Li, Z., & Liu, C. (2005). China’s ecological rehabilitation: The unprecedented efforts and dramatic impacts of reforestation and slope protection in Western China (China Environment Series 7, pp. 17–32).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha, Y., & Gao, J. (1997). Characteristics of desertification and its rehabilitation in China. Journal of Arid Environments, 37(3), 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. B. (1998). The evolution of China’s environmental diplomacy. World Economics and Politics, 11, 38–44 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2010). Application analysis of participatory approach in the grain for green project [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 9(1), 106–109 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. T. (2010). Views on conversion of cropland into forest under current situation. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 17(4), 276–278 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H. (2001a). State council approves Six Key Forestry Programs. People’s Daily.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2001b). A brief introduction to six major forestry programs in China [我国六大生态林业重点工程简介]. Ecological Economy, 10, 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., & Cheng, G. (1994). 中国土地沙质荒漠化 [China land desertification]. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Delang, C.O., Yuan, Z. (2015). China’s Reforestation and Rural Development Programs. In: China’s Grain for Green Program. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11505-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics