Advertisement

Modeling Musical Performance Data with Statistics

Chapter
  • 1k Downloads
Part of the Computational Music Science book series (CMS)

Abstract

Today, the relationship between music and mathematics is a common factor. In the last two or three decades, the advances in mathematics, computer science, psychology, semiotics, and related fields, together with technological progress (in particular computer technology), lead to a revival of quantitative thinking in music [see, e.g., Archibald (1972), Babbitt (1961), Balzano (1980), Lewin (1987), Lendvai (1993), Forte (1964, 1973), Morris (1987, 1995), Johnson and Wichern (2002), Leyton (2001), Andreatta (1997), Solomon (1973), Beran and Mazzola (1999), Meyer (1989)]. Musical events can be expressed as a specific ordered temporal sequence, and time series analysis is the observations indexed by an ordered variable (usually time). It is therefore not surprising that time series analysis is important for analyzing musical data as it is always be the function of time. Music is an organized sound. But the equation of these sounds does not produce the formula of how and why sounds are connected. Statistics is a subject which can connect theoretical concept with observable phenomenon and statistical tools that can used to find and analyzing the structure to build a model. But applications of statistical methods in Indian musicology and performance research are very rare. There were some researches that had been done on Western musicology and mostly consist of simple applications of standard statistical tools. Due to the complex nature of music, statistics is likely to play an important role where the random variables are the musical notes which are function of time.

Keywords

Time Series Analysis Mean Absolute Percentage Error ARIMA Model Musical Note Random Shock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. M. Andreatta, Group-theoretical methods applied to music. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, 1997Google Scholar
  2. B. Archibald, Some thoughts on symmetry in early Webern. Perspect. New Music 10, 159–163 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Babbitt, Set structure as a compositional determinant. JMT 5(2), 72–94 (1961)Google Scholar
  4. G.J. Balzano, The group theoretic description of 12-fold and microtonal pitch systems. Comput. Music J. 4(4), 66–84 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Beran, G. Mazzola, Analyzing musical structure and performance: a statistical approach. Stat. Sci. 14(1), 47–79 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Beran, Statistics in Musicology (Chapman & Hall, New York, 2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. G.E.P. Box, G.M. Jenkins, Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control (Holden Day, San Francisco, 1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Chakraborty, R. Shukla, Raga Malkauns revisited with special emphasis on modeling. Ninad J. ITC Sangeet Res. Acad. 23, 13–21 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. S. Chakraborty, M. Kumari, S.S. Solanki, S. Chatterjee, On what probability can and cannot do: A case study on raga Malkauns, in National Symposium on Acoustics 2009, Hyderabad, India, 26–28 Nov 2009Google Scholar
  10. P. Desikan, J. Srivastava, Time series analysis and forecasting methods for temporal mining of interlinked documents. Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, www-users.cs.umn.edu/~desikan/publications/TimeSeries.doc, accessed on January 26, 2014Google Scholar
  11. D. Dutta, Sangeet Tattwa (Pratham Khanda), 5th edn. (Brati Prakashani, 2006) (Bengali) (Kolkata, India)Google Scholar
  12. A. Forte, A theory of set-complexes for music. JMT 8(2), 136–183 (1964)Google Scholar
  13. A. Forte, Structure of Atonal Music (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1973)Google Scholar
  14. R.A. Johnson, D.W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2002)Google Scholar
  15. E. Lendvai, Symmetries of Music (Kodaly Institute, Kecskemet, 1993)Google Scholar
  16. D. Lewin, Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1987)Google Scholar
  17. M. Leyton, A Generative Theory of Shape (Springer, New York, 2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. G.M. Ljung, G.E.P. Box, On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65, 297–303 (1978)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. D. McDowall, R. McCleary, E.E. Meidinger, R. Hay Jr., Interrupted Time Series Analysis (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1980)Google Scholar
  20. L.B. Meyer, Style and Music: Theory, History, and Ideology (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1989). Re statistics: 57–65Google Scholar
  21. J. Morehen, Statistics in the analysis of musical style, in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Computers and Musicology, Orsay (CNRS, Paris, 1981), pp. 169–183Google Scholar
  22. R.D. Morris, Composition with Pitch-Classes (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1987)Google Scholar
  23. R.D. Morris, Compositional spaces and other territories. PNM 33, 328–358 (1995)Google Scholar
  24. L.J. Solomon, Symmetry as a determinant of musical composition. Ph.D. thesis, University of West Virginia, 1973Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsBirla Institute of Technology (BIT), MesraRanchiIndia
  2. 2.School of MusicUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Dept. of Computer ApplicationsNetaji Subhash Engineering Coll (NSEC)KolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations