The Impact of the Use of Web 2.0 Technologies on the Performance of Polish Manufacturing Companies

  • Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska
  • Irene Krebs
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 183)


Any knowledge management tools which are used in enterprises must be continuously enhanced and adapted to ever changing business needs and priorities. This paper systematically examines the role of the effective use of information and/or knowledge management tools in Polish manufacturing companies. This study addresses the issue of whether or not there is an importance in the use of Web 2.0 Technologies regarding the performance of Polish manufacturing companies. The study is based on a survey and interviews in 25 Polish manufacturing companies which use knowledge management tools.


Web 2.0 technologies Polish manufacturing companies 


  1. 1.
    Borghoff, U.M., Pareschi, R.: Information technology for knowledge management. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 3(8), 835–842 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crotts, J.C., Mason, P.R., Davis, B.: Measuring guest satisfaction and competitive position. J. Travel Res. 48(2), 139–151 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Devaraj, S., Kohli, R.: Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Manag. Sci. 49(3), 273–289 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Homburg, C., Pflesser, C.: A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. J. Mark. Res. 37(4), 449–462 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horton, R.P., Buck, T., Waterson, P.E., Clegg, C.W.: Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model. J. Inf. Technol. 16, 237–249 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, D.H.: Voice over IP, Its visions and market analysis. Inf. Soc. 12, 64–91 (2007). (The Korean Association for Information Society)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koch, M.: CSCW and Enterprise 2.0 – towards an integrated perspective. In: Proceedings of the Bled eConference eCollaboration (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law, C.C.H., Ngai, E.W.T.: An empirical study of the effects of knowledge sharing and learning behaviors on firm performance. Expert Syst. Appl. 34, 2342–2349 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lev, M.: WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management. J. Knowl. Manag. 13(1), 120–134 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McAfee, A.P.: Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent colaboration. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 47(3), 21–28 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muljadi, H., Takeda, H., Shakya, A., Kawamoto, S., Kobayashi, S., Fujiyama, A., Ando, K.: Semantic Wiki as a lightweight knowledge management system. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 65–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2005).
  13. 13.
    Patalas-Maliszewska J., Krebs I.: Model of innovation transfer is small and medium enterprises (SME). In: Advances in Production Engineering APE 2010: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference. Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Production Engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simon, H.A.: The New Science of Management Decision, Revised edition edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Venkatraman, N.: Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 942–962 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagner, C.: Breaking the knowledge acquisition bottleneck through conversational knowledge management. Inf. Resour. Manag. J. 19(1), 70–83 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wirtz, B.W., Lihotzky, N.: Customer retention management in the B2C electronic business. Long Range Plan. 36(6), 517–532 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, C., Hu, Z., Gu, F.F.: Intra- and interfirm coordination of export manufacturers: A cluster analysis of indigenous Chinese exporters. J. Int. Mark. 16(3), 108–135 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zott, C., Amit, R.: Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 18(2), 181–199 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Zielona GóraZielona GoraPoland
  2. 2.Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-SenftenbergCottbusGermany

Personalised recommendations