Integrating the IS Success Model for Value-Oriented KMS Decision Support

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 183)

Abstract

Evaluating the success of an Information System (IS) is not a trivial problem and usually demands the utilization of several dimensions to cover all facets influencing the success of. Yet, the success provides indications on whether to alignment of the introduced IS to the organizations goals worked out. As scientific literature knows several multi-dimensional approaches for the determination of IS Success, which evolved over the years, a systematic literature analysis can provide a general overview providing the state of the art. Within this paper we renew a systematic literature analysis done by Urbach et al. [1] looking for the recent developments in the field of IS Success. The found approach is supposed to provide us with an procedure to be integrated for a higher value and benefit orientation in the choice and implementation process of knowledge management systems for small and medium enterprises, being able to address their need for value orientation more accurate.

Keywords

IS success KMS success Systematic literature analysis KMS Recommendation 

References

  1. 1.
    Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., Riempp, G.: The state of research on information systems success. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1(4), 315–325 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borchardt, U.: Towards value-driven alignment of KMS for SME. In: Abramowicz, W., Maciaszek, L., Wȩcel, K. (eds.) BIS Workshops 2011 and BIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 97, pp. 220–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, vol. 33. Keele University, Keele (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 19, 9–30 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borchardt, U.: Towards a value-oriented KMS recommendation for SME. In: Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds.) KMIS 2011, pp. 347–350. SciTePress (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Science Research in Information Systems. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol. 22, pp. 9–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maier, R.: Knowledge Management Systems: Information and Communication Technologies for Knowledge Management, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O.P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(1), 7–15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saunders, C.: MIS Journal rankings (2008). http://www.isworld.org/csaunders/rankings.htm
  11. 11.
    Lee, C., Ko, I., Jeong, C.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information service for SMEs on information orientation and firm performance. In: 42nd HICSS 2009, IEEE, pp. 1–9 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petter, S., McLean, E.R.: A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: an examination of IS success at the individual level. Inf. Manage. 46(3), 159–166 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu, J., Benbasat, I., Cenfetelli, R.T.: Does live help service matter? An empirical test of the DeLone and McLean’s extended model in the e-service context. In: 43rd HICSS 2010, IEEE, pp. 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, Y.M., Wang, Y.S.: Examining the dimensionality and measurement of user-perceived knowledge and information quality in the KMS context. J. Inf. Sci. 35(1), 94–109 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., Riempp, G.: An empirical investigation of employee portal success. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 19(3), 184–206 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bernroider, E.W.: IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone-McLean model of information systems success. Inf. Manage. 45(5), 257–269 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cho, J., Park, I., Michel, J.W.: How does leadership affect information systems success? The role of transformational leadership. Inf. Manage. 48(7), 270–277 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duarte, A.I.M., Costa, C.J.: Information systems: life cycle and success. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Systems and Design of Communication, ACM, pp. 25–30 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaiser, M.G., Ahlemann, F.: Measuring project management information systems success: towards a conceptual model and survey instrument. In: 2010 Proceedings of ECIS (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jennex, M.E.: Assessing knowledge management success effectiveness models. In: 37th HICSS 2004, IEEE, pp. 10–19 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bullinger, H.J., Wörner, K., Prieto, J.: Wissensmanagement-modelle und strategien für die Praxis. In: Bürgel, H.D. (ed.) Wissensmanagement, pp. 21–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schnell, R., Hill, P.B., Esser, E.: Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Oldenbourg, München (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Naturalistic Inquiry, vol. 75. Sage, Beverly Hills (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Business Information SystemsUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations