Economic Viability Analytics for Wind Energy Maintenance Management

  • Jesús María Pinar Pérez
  • Eva Segura Asensio
  • Fausto Pedro García Márquez
Chapter

Abstract

The rising wind energy in addition to the increasing number of failures of the larger wind turbines makes necessary the reduction of costs in this industry to make it more competitive in this sector. For this propose the wind energy industry is focused on the reduction of the operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. Condition Monitoring Systems (CMS) are probably the most effective approach to minimize O&M cost and substantially improve the availability, reliability and safety of wind turbines by early detection of the faults. On the other hand, CMS is usual a complex task for any firm because it requires a set of sensors and data acquisition systems to monitor different parameters of the wind turbines. It also requires knowledge and expertise to interpret the large volume of data collected from the wind turbines. In this research work is studied the economic feasibility of a CMS in a wind turbine. The main objective of this work is the development of a life cycle cost (LCC) model for a CMS on wind turbines, being applied to a real case study in Germany. Previously, a review of the literature is realized to describe the state of the art for the economic viability analysis of CMS in wind turbines. This study reveals that the return of the investment depends on the net present value factor, the interest rate of a credit bank and the reduction of failures and energy losses of the wind turbines using CM.

References

  1. 1.
    Ghenai C (2012) Life cycle analysis of wind turbine, sustainable development. In: Ghenai C (ed) Energy, engineering and technologies - manufacturing and environment, Chap. 2. InTech, ISBN: 978-953-51-0165-9, pp 19–32Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fung KT, Scheffler RL, Stolpe J (1981) Wind energy – a utility perspective. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst 100:1176–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ezio S, Claudio C (1998) Exploitation of wind as an energy source to meet the world’s electricity demand. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 74–76:375–387Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Milborrow D (2006) Operation and maintenance costs compared and revealed. Wind Stats 19(3):3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vachon W (2002) Long-term O&M cost of wind turbines based on failure rates and repair costs. In: Proceedings WINDPOWER, American Wind Energy Association annual conference, Portland, OR, June 2002, pp 2–5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tavner PJ, Spinato F, van Bussel GJW, Koutoulakos E (2008) Reliability of different wind turbine concepts with relevance of offshore application. In: European wind energy conference, Brussels, April 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    (2004) Life cycle costing guideline. Total asset management, New South Wales Treasury, ISBN 0 7313 3325 XGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Novaes Pires G, Alencar E, Kraj A (2010) Remote conditioning monitoring system for a hybrid wind diesel system-application at Fernando de Naronha Island, Brasil, http://www.ontario-sea.org (19-07-10)
  9. 9.
    Pinar Pérez JM, García Márquez FP, Tobias AM, Papaelias M (2013) Wind turbine reliability analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 23:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiggelinkhuizen E, Verbruggen T, Xian J, Watson SJ, Giebel G, Norton E et al (2007) CONMOW: condition monitoring for offshore wind farms. In: Proceedings of the 2007 EWEA European wind energy conference (EWEC2007), Milan, Italy, May 2007, pp 7–10Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tongdan J, Mechehoul M (2010) Minimize production loss in device testing via condition-based equipment maintenance. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 7(4):958–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rumsey MA, Paquette JA (2008) Structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2008, vol 6933. 69330E-1-69330E-15. SPIE-2008-6933-14AGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scarf PA (2007) A framework for condition monitoring and condition based maintenance. Qual Technol Quant Manag 4(2):301–312Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang WX, Tavner PJ, Crabtree CJ, Wilkinson M (2010) Cost effective condition monitoring for wind turbines. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(1):263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nilsson J, Bertling L (2007) Maintenance management of wind power systems using condition monitoring systems – life cycle costs analysis for two case studies. IEEE Trans Energy Conv 22(1):223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orsagh RF, Lee H, Watson M, Byington CS, Powers J (2006) Advanced vibration monitoring for wind turbine health management, impact technologies, http://www.impact-tek.com
  18. 18.
    Amirat Y, Benbouzid MEH, Bensaker B, Wamkeue R (2007) Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis in wind energy conversion systems: a review. In: Electric machines and drives conference 2007 (IEMDC07), Antalya, Turkey, pp 1434–1439Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wakui T, Yokoyama R (2013) Wind Speed Sensorless performance monitoring based on operating behaviour for stand-alone vertical axis wind turbine. Renew Energy 53(1):49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kusiak A, Zhang Z, Verma A (2013) Prediction, operations, and condition monitoring in wind energy. Energy 60(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li L, Wenxiu L, Fulei C (2010) Application of AE techniques for the detection of wind turbine using Hilbert-Huang transform. In: PHM’10 prognostics and health management conference, Macao, China, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsopelas N, Kourousis D, Ladis I, Anastasopulos A, Lekou DJ, Mouzakis F (2012) Health monitoring of operating wind turbine blades with acoustic emission. In: Paipetis AS et al (eds) Emerging technologies in non-destructive testing V. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knezevic J (1993) Reliability, maintainability and supportability engineering: a probabilistic approach. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Endrenyi J, McCauley J, Shing C (2001) The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance and reliability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(4):638–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hameed Z, Hong YS, Choa YM, Ahn SH, Song CK (2009) Condition Monitoring and fault detection for wind turbines and related algorithms: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wiesent BR, Schardt M, Koch AW (2012) Gear oil condition monitoring for offshore wind turbines. Available online at http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/28782/gear-oil-condition-monitoring (12-06-14)
  27. 27.
    Morfiadakis E, Papadopoulos K, Philippidis TP (2000) Assessment of the stain gauge technique for measurement of wind energy turbine blade loads. Wind Energy 3(1):35–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schroeder K, Ecke W, Apitz J, Lembke E, Lenschow G (2006) A fiber Bragg grating sensor system monitors operational load in a wind turbine rotor blade. Meas Sci Technol 17(5):1167–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smith BM (1978) Condition monitoring by thermography. NDT Int 11(3):121–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rumsey MA, Musial W (2001) Application of infrared thermography non destructive testing during wind turbine blade tests. J Solar Energy Eng 123(4):271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhen L, Zhengjia H, Yanyang Z, Xuefeng C (2008) Bearing condition monitoring based on shock pulse method and improved redundant lifting scheme. Math Comput Simulat 79(3):318–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sorensen BF, Lading L, Sendrup P, McGugan M, Debel CP, Kristensen OJD et al (2002) Fundamentals for remote structural health monitoring of wind turbines blades – a preproject. In: Risø-R-1336(EN). Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, May 2002Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Raisutis R, Jasiuniene E, Sliteris R, Vladisauskas A (2008) The review of non-destructive testing techniques suitable for inspection of the wind turbines blades. Ultragarsas (Ultrasound) 63(1):26–30Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Caselitz P, Giebhardt J (2003) Fault prediction techniques for offshore wind farm maintenance and repair strategies. In: Proceedings of the EWEC2003Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cheng J, Yang Y, Yu D (2010) The envelope order spectrum based on generalized demodulation time-frequency analysis and its application to gear fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:508–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tandon N, Nakra BC (1992) Comparison of vibration and acoustic measurement techniques for the condition monitoring of rolling element bearings. Tribol Int 25(3):205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Staszewski WJ, Tomlinson GR (1994) Application of the wavelet transform to fault detection in a Spur gear. Mech Syst Signal Process 8:289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Luo GY, Osypiw D, Irle M (2003) Online vibration analysis with fast continuous wavelet algorithm for condition monitoring of bearing. J Vib Control 9:931–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ocak H, Loparo KA (2001) A new bearing fault detection and diagnosis scheme based on Hidden Markov modeling of vibrations signals. IEEE ICASSP 5:3141–3144Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Miaoa Q, Makis V (2007) Condition monitoring and classification of rotating machinery using wavelets and Hidden Markov Models. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:840–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yam RCM, Tse PW, Li L, Tu P (2001) Intelligent predictive decision support system for condition-based maintenance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(5):383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    García Márquez FP, Tobias AM, Pinar Pérez JM, Papaelias M (2012) Condition monitoring of wind turbines: techniques and methods. Renew Energy 46:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fabrycky WJ, Blanchard BS (1991) Life-cycle cost and economic analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Castro-Santos L, Prado García G, Diaz-Casas V (2013) Methodology to study the life cycle cost of floating offshore wind farms. In: 10th deep sea wind R&D conferenceGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Castro-Santos L, Filgueira Vizoso A, Muñoz Camacho E, Piegiari L (2012) General economic analysis about the wind farms repowering in Spain. J Energy Power Eng 6:1158–1162Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nordahl M (2011) The development of a life cycle cost model for an offshore wind farm, Göteborg: Chalmers tekniska högskola. Diploma work – Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden. ISSN 1652-8557Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Krokoszinski H-J (2003) Efficiency and effectiveness of wind farms – keys to cost optimized operation and maintenance. Renew Energy 28:2165–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Walford CA (2006) Wind turbine reliability: understanding and minimizing wind turbine operation and maintenance costs. Sandia Report, SAND2006-1100. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and Livermore, CAGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Besnard F, Fischer K, Bertling L (2010) Reliability-centred asset maintenance – a step towards enhanced reliability, availability, and profitability of wind power plants. In: 2010 I.E. PES Innovative smart grid technologies conference Europe (ISGT Europe), pp 1–8Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hameed Z, Ahn SH, Cho YM (2010) Practical aspects of a condition monitoring system for a wind turbine with emphasis on its design, system architecture, testing and installation. Renew Energy 35:879–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Besnard F, Nilsson J, Bertling L (2010) On the economic benefits of using condition monitoring systems for maintenance management of wind power systems. In: 2010 I.E. 11th international conference on probabilistic methods applied to power systems, pp 160–165Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    García Márquez FP, Lewis RW, Tobias AM, Roberts C (2008) Life cycle costs for railway condition monitoring. Transport Res E 44:1175–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesús María Pinar Pérez
    • 1
  • Eva Segura Asensio
    • 2
  • Fausto Pedro García Márquez
    • 2
  1. 1.CUNEF-IngeniumMadridSpain
  2. 2.Ingenium Research GroupUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaCiudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations