The Assessment and Selection of Hedge Funds

  • Joaquin López Pascual


The following Chapter intends to be a small guide to investing in hedge funds or a guide to take into account when trying to understand the complexities of investing in hedge funds. We aim to give a general overview of the field of alternative investments and to introduce its complexities, because investing in hedge funds is not at all a very simple task.

In this Chapter, we assess the challenges of analysing and selecting hedge funds. Alternative investment vehicles have taken an important role not only in the diversification of portfolios but also as standalone investments. Capturing the entire risk dimensions implied in hedge fund investment strategies is paramount in understanding alternative investments. We also analyse the problem of the lack of benchmarks. Should the performance of a hedge fund follow a benchmark? As absolute return vehicles, alternative investment organizations should not be benchmarked. However, investors need to compare returns with other assets in order to properly assess the cost of opportunity implied in hedge fund investing. We consider also benchmarking among peers as a new and latest strategy.


Hedge funds Alternative investments Funds of hedge funds 


  1. 1.
    López Pascual J, Cuellar RD (2010) Assessment and selection of hedge funds and funds of hedge funds. Working Paper N 5 2010, CunefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waring MB, Siegel LB (2006) The myth of the absolute-return investor. Financ Anal J 62(2):14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fung W, Hsieh DA (2001) The risk in hedge fund strategies: theory and evidence of trend follower. Rev Financ Stud 41:313–41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kat HM (2005) Integrating hedge funds into the traditional portfolio. J Wealth Manage 7(4):51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brinson GP, Hood LR, Beebower GL (1986) Determinants of portfolio performance II: an update. Financ Anal J 42(4):35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brinson GP, Singer BD, Beebower GL (1991) Determinants of portfolio performance II: an update. Financ Anal J 47(3):40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lintner J (1983) The potential role of managed commodity-financial futures accounts (and/or funds) in portfolios of stocks and bonds. Presentation at the Financial Analysts FederationGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rockefellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rockefellar RT, Uryasev S (2001) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Research Report 2001–2005. ISE Department, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    López Pascual J, Cuellar RDR (2007) The challenges of launching, rating, and regulating funds of hedge funds. J Derivatives Hedge Funds 13(3):247–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lhabitant F-S (2004) Hedge funds: quantitative insights. John Willey & Sons, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bailey JV (1992) Are manager universes acceptable benchmarks? J Portfol Manage 18:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gregoriou G, Zhu J (2005) Evaluating hedge fund and CTA performance, data envelopment analysis approach. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carpenter J (2000) Does option compensation increase managerial risk appetite? J Financ 21:2311–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ross SA (2004) Compensation, incentives, and the duality of risk aversion and riskiness. J Financ 59:207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Panageas S, Westerfield MM (2005) High-water marks: high risk appetites? Convex compensation, long horizons and portfolio choice. Working Paper 03–06, The Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, The Wharton School, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    López Pascual J, Cuellar RD (2008) Can the hedge fund regulation limit the negative impact of a systemic crisis. Universia Bus Rev 20:42–53Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sirri E, Tuffano P (1992) The demand for mutual fund services by individual investors. Working Paper, Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chevalier J, Ellison G (1995) Risk-taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. NBER Working Paper No. 5234Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goetzmann W, Ingersoll J Jr, Ross S (2003) High-water marks and hedge fund management contracts. J Financ LVIII(4):1685–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceUniversity Rey Juan Carlos MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations