Assessing Aspect Oriented Approaches in Business Process Management
Separation of concerns is an important topic in Business Process Modeling. One sort of concerns is cross-cutting, like security, which are repeated in many business processes. These concerns make the models more complex, since concerns are repeated in many process models. The repetition of realization of concerns in process models makes the maintenance cumbersome. Aspect Oriented Business Process Modeling is an approach to address these concerns, which has been investigated recently. However, no set of requirements are defined for such modeling proposals, which makes the evaluation of and comparison between these approaches impossible. Therefore, this paper introduces a set of requirements for the aspect oriented business process modeling, which are used to define an evaluation framework for assessing these modeling approaches. The framework is used to evaluate existing aspect oriented business process modeling proposals. The result shows a comparison between different modeling proposals by clarifying their strengths and weaknesses. It also shows the gap in the area, which can be used as direction for future research.
KeywordsBusiness Process Modelling Aspect Oriented Requirements Evaluation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Accorsi, R.: An approach to data-driven detective internal controls for process-aware information systems. Data Usage Management on the Web, 29 (2011)Google Scholar
- 2.Cappelli, C., Santoro, F., do Prado Leite, J., Batista, T., Medeiros, A., Romeiro, C.: Reflections on the modularity of business process models: The case for introducing the aspect-oriented paradigm. BPM Journal 16, 662–687 (2010)Google Scholar
- 5.Collell, D.C.: Aspect-oriented modeling of business processes. Master’s thesis, der Technischen Universitat Darmstadt, Darmstadt (2012)Google Scholar
- 6.Jabeen, A., Tariq, S., Farooq, Q., Malik, Z.: A lightweight aspect modelling approach for bpmn. In: 2011 IEEE 14th International Multitopic Conference (INMIC), pp. 255–260 (2011)Google Scholar
- 9.Jalali, A., Wohed, P., Ouyang, C., Johannesson, P.: Dynamic weaving in aspect oriented business process management. In: Meersman, R., Panetto, H., Dillon, T., Eder, J., Bellahsene, Z., Ritter, N., De Leenheer, P., Dou, D. (eds.) ODBASE 2013. LNCS, vol. 8185, pp. 2–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
- 12.I. O. Object Management Group. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Technical report, Object Management Group, Inc. (OMG) (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Patiniotakis, I., Papageorgiou, N., Verginadis, Y., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G.: An aspect oriented approach for implementing situational driven adaptation of bpmn2.0 workflows. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 414–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Shankardass, A.: The dynamic adaptation of an aspect oriented business process in a service oriented architecture platform. Master’s thesis, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta (2009)Google Scholar
- 15.Wang, J., Zhu, J., Liang, H., Xu, K.: Concern oriented business process modeling. In: IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, ICEBE 2007, pp. 355–358 (2007)Google Scholar