Skip to main content

An Agent Architecture for Concurrent Bilateral Negotiations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems III - Impact of Decision Support Systems for Global Environments (EWG-DSS 2013, EWG-DSS 2013)

Abstract

We present an architecture that makes use of symbolic decision-making to support agents participating in concurrent bilateral negotiations. The architecture is a revised version of previous work with the KGP model [12, 23], which we specialise with knowledge about the agent’s self, the negotiation opponents and the environment. Our work combines the specification of domain-independent decision-making with a new protocol for concurrent negotiation that revisits the well-known alternating offers protocol [22]. We show how the decision-making can be specialised to represent the agent’s strategies, utilities and preferences using a Prolog-like meta-program. The work prepares the ground for supporting decision-making in concurrent bilateral negotiations that is more lightweight than previous work and contributes towards a fully developed model of the architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Pitt, J.: Specifying norm-governed computational societies. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 10(1), 1–42 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. An, B., Gatti, N., Lesser, V.: Extending alternating-offers bargaining in one-to-many and many-to-many settings. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - vol. 02, WI-IAT ’09, pp. 423–426, Washington, DC, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. An, B., Lesser, V., Sim, K.M.: Strategic agents for multi-resource negotiation. J. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 23, 114–153 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bromuri, S., Stathis, K.: Distributed agent environments in the Ambient Event Calculus. In: DEBS 2009. ACM. NY, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ashri, R., Rahwan, I., Luck, M.: Architectures for negotiating agents. In: Mařík, V., Müller, J.P., Pěchouček, M. (eds.) CEEMAS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2691, pp. 136–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakos, J.Y.: A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS Q. 15(3), 295–310 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bromuri, S., Urovi, V., Morge, M., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: A multi-agent system for service discovery, selection and negotiation. In: AAMAS 2009, pp. 1395–1396 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bromuri, S., Stathis, K.: Situating cognitive agents in GOLEM. In: Weyns, D., Brueckner, S.A., Demazeau, Y. (eds.) EEMMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5049, pp. 115–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Buyya, R., Yeo, C.S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., Brandic, I.: Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 25(6), 599–616 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artif. Intell. 142, 205–237 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, R., Ury, W.L.: Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving, 2nd edn. Penguin (Non-Classics), New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forth, J., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: Decision making with a KGP agent system. J. Decis. Syst. 15(2–3), 241–266 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hernández, J.E., Mula, J., Poler, R., Lyons, A.C.: Collaborative planning in multi-tier supply chains supported by a negotiation-based mechanism and multi-agent system. Group Decis. Negot. 23, 235–269 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hernández, J.E., Lyons, A.C., Mula, J., Poler, R., Ismail, H.S.: Supporting the collaborative decision-making process in an automotive supply chain with a multi-agent system. Prod. Plan. Control. 25(8), 662–678 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hernández, J.E., Lyons, A.C., Poler, R., Mula, J., Goncalves, R.: A reference architecture for the collaborative planning modelling process in multi-tier supply chain networks: a Zachman-based approach. Prod. Plan. Control (2014) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P., Sadri, F., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: Declarative agent control. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3487, pp. 96–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Gener. Comput. 4, 67–95 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McGinnis, J., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: A formal framework of virtual organisations as agent societies. In: FAVO, pp. 1–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morge, M., McGinnis, J., Bromuri, S., Toni, F., Mancarella, P., Stathis, K.: Toward a modular architecture of argumentative agents to compose services. In: Proceedings of EUMAS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, T., Jennings, N.R.: Coordinating multiple concurrent negotiations. In: 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 1064–1071 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation Among Computers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1), 97–109 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Stathis, K., Toni, F.: The KGP model of agency for decision making in e-negotiation. In: Joint-Workshop on Decision Support Systems, Experimental Economics E-Participation, June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  24. West, P., Ariely, D., Bellman, S., Bradlow, E., Huber, J., Johnson, E., Kahn, B., Little, J., Schkade, D.: Agents to the rescue? Marketing Lett. 10(3), 285–300 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams, C.R., Robu, V., Gerding, E.H., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiating concurrently with unknown opponents in complex, real-time domains. In: 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 242, pp. 834–839, August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  26. Witkowski, M., Stathis, K.: A dialectic architecture for computational autonomy. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds.) AUTONOMY 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2969, pp. 261–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bedour Alrayes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alrayes, B., Stathis, K. (2014). An Agent Architecture for Concurrent Bilateral Negotiations. In: Dargam, F., et al. Decision Support Systems III - Impact of Decision Support Systems for Global Environments. EWG-DSS EWG-DSS 2013 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11364-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11364-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11363-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11364-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics