Advertisement

Introduction to Technological Entrepreneurship

  • Elias G. Carayannis
  • Elpida T. Samara
  • Yannis L. Bakouros
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

Adam Smith (1776) defined Land, Labor and Capital as the key input factors of the eighteenth century economy. Joseph Schumpeter (1934) added Technology and Entrepreneurship as two more key input factors in the early twentieth century. The role and dynamic nature of technological change and innovation, as well as their interdependencies, were thus acknowledged as main factors shaping the world economy’s future. The static approach of the Neoclassical Economic Theory was eventually abandoned.

Keywords

Venture Capitalist Social Entrepreneurship Internal Entrepreneurship Innovation Network Business Angel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albert P, Marion S (1997) Ouvrir l’enseignement à l’ésprit d’entreprendreGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ, Nalebuff BJ, Brandenburger A, Maulana A, Nalebuff B, Brandenburger AM (1996) Campus-Verlag, 1996. 201Google Scholar
  3. Carayannis E (1993) Incrementalisme Strategique, Le Progrès Technique, no. 2, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. Carayannis E (1994a) A multi-national, resource-based view of training and development and the strategic management of technological learning: keys for social and corporate survival and success. In: 39th International council for small business annual world conference, Strasbourg, France, June 27–29Google Scholar
  5. Carayannis E (1994b) The strategic management of technological learning from a dynamically adaptive high tech marketing perspective: sustainable competitive advantage through effective supplier-customer interfacing, University of Illinois, Chicago/American Management Association Research Symposium on Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Paris, France, June 29–30Google Scholar
  6. Carayannis E (1994c) Gestion Strategique de l’Acquisition des Savoir-Faire, Le Progrès Technique, no. 1, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. Carayannis E (1998a) The strategic management of technological learning in project/program management: the role of extranets, intranets and intelligent agents in knowledge generation, diffusion, and leveraging. Technovation 18(11):697–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carayannis E (1998b) Higher order technological learning as determinant of market success in the multimedia arena; a success story, a failure, and a question mark: Agfa/Bayer AG, enable software, and sun microsystems. Technovation 18(10):639–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carayannis E (1999) Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: the role of knowledge management. Technovation 19(4):219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carayannis E (2000–2009) GWU LecturesGoogle Scholar
  11. Carayannis E (2001) Learning more, better, and faster: a multi-industry, longitudinal, empirical validation of technological learning as the key source of sustainable competitive advantage in high-technology firms. Int J TechnovationGoogle Scholar
  12. Carayannis E (2002) Is higher order technological learning a firm core competence, how, why, and when: a longitudinal, multi-industry study of firm technological learning and market performance. Int J Technovation 22:625–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carayannis E (2008) Knowledge-driven creative destruction or leveraging knowledge for competitive advantage: Strategic Knowledge Arbitrage and Serendipity (SKARSE) as Real Options Drivers (RODs) triggered by co-opetition, co-evolution and co-specialization (C3). J Ind Higher Edu 22(6):343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carayannis EG (2009) Firm evolution dynamics: toward sustainable entrepreneurship and robust competitiveness in the knowledge economy and society. Int J Innov Regional Dev (1)3:235–254Google Scholar
  15. Carayannis EG, Alexander J (1999a) To intellectual capital in co-opetitive research and technology management settings. Int J Technol Manage 18(3/4):326–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carayannis E, Alexander J (1999b) Winning by co-opeting in strategic Government-University-Industry (GUI) partnerships: the power of complex, dynamic knowledge networks. J Technol Transfer 24(2/3):197–210, August. Note: Awarded 1999 Lang-Rosen Award for Best Paper by the Technology Transfer SocietyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2006) A “‘Mode 3’ Systems Approach for Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Use: Towards a 21dt Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem”, re-discovering schumpeter: creative destruction evolving into ‘Mode 3’. In: Carayannis EG, Ziemnowicz C (Co-Editors) Chapter 7, Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  18. Carayannis EG, Ziemnowicz C (2007) Co-editors, re-discovering Schumpeter: creative destruction evolving into ‘Mode 3’. Macmillan, PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  19. Carayannis E, Campbell D (2009) “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: towards a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manage 46(3/4):201–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carayannis E, Gonzalez E (2003) Creativity and innovation = competitiveness? When, how, and why. In: Shavinina LV (ed) The international handbook on innovation, Part VIII, Chapter 3. Elsevier Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Carayannis E, Maximilian von Zedwitz (2005) Architecting GloCal (Global – Local), Real-Virtual Incubator Networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practice. Int J Technovation 25(2)Google Scholar
  22. Carayannis E, Rogers E et al (1998) High-technology spin-offs from government RandD Laboratories and Research Universities. Technovation 18(1):1–11, January. NOTE: 1998 Recipient of two Emerald Management Reviews Citations - Citation of Excellence for Practical Implications and Citation of Excellence for OriginalityCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carayannis E, Kassicieh S, Radosevich R (2000) Strategic alliances as a source of early-stage seed capital in technology-based firms. Technovation 20(11):603–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carayannis E, Alexander GJ, Geraghty J (2001) Service sector productivity: B2B electronic commerce as a strategic driver. J Technol Transfer 26(4):337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carayannis EGD, Popescu CS, Stewart M (2006) Technological Learning for Entrepreneurial Development (TL4ED) in the Knowledge Economy (KE): case studies and lessons learned. Technovation 26(4):419–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carayannis EG, Assimakopoulos D, Kondo M (Co-editors) (2008) Innovation networks and knowledge clusters: findings and insights from the US, EU and Japan. Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  27. Drucker PF (1998) The discipline of innovation, Harv Bus Rev 63(3):3–8 Drucker PF, 1998Google Scholar
  28. OECD (1996) The Knowledge based economy, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Porter ME (ed) (1986) Competition in global industries. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  30. Schumpeter JA (1934) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker and Humblot, Berlin (reproduced 1997)Google Scholar
  31. Smith, A. 1776 [1977]. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Chicago, University Of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elias G. Carayannis
    • 1
  • Elpida T. Samara
    • 2
  • Yannis L. Bakouros
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems and Technology Management School of BusinessGeorge Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Western MacedoniaKozaniGreece

Personalised recommendations