Advertisement

General Schemes of Combining Rules and the Quality Characteristics of Combining

  • Alexander Lepskiy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8764)

Abstract

Some general schemes and examples of aggregation of two belief functions into a single belief function are considered in this paper. We find some sufficient conditions of change of ignorance when evidences are combined with the help of various rules. It is shown that combining rules can be regarded as pessimistic or optimistic depending on the sign of the change of ignorance after applying.

Keywords

combining rules change of ignorance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bronevich, A.G.: On the closure of families of fuzzy measures under eventwise aggregations. Fuzzy sets and systems 153, 45–70 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bronevich, A., Lepskiy, A.: Operators for convolution of fuzzy measures. In: Grzegorzewski, P., et al. (eds.) Soft Methods in Probability, Statistics and Data Analysis, pp. 84–91. Physical-Verl., Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bronevich, A., Lepskiy, A.: Measuring uncertainty with imprecision indices. In: Proc. of the Fifth International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications (ISIPTA 2007), Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 47–56 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng, Y., Kashyap, R.L.: An axiomatic approach for combining evidence from a variety of sources. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 1(1), 17–33 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dempster, A.P.: Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38(2), 325–339 (1967)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A note on measures of specificity for fuzzy sets. Int. J. of General Systems 10, 279–283 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A set-theoretic view of belief functions — Logical operations and approximation by fuzzy sets. Int. J. of General Systems 12(3), 193–226 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: On the combination of evidence in various mathematical frameworks. In: Flamm, J., Luisi, T. (eds.) Reliability Data Collection and Analysis, pp. 213-241. Brussels, ECSC, EEC, EAFC (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grabisch, M., Marichal, J.L., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Aggregation Functions. Cambridge University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiao, L., Pan, Q., Liang, Y., Feng, X., Yang, F.: Combining sources of evidence with reliability and importance for decision making. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 1–20 (December 2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S.: Axiomatic approaches to formulas for combining likelihoods or evidence. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 31(1), 49–54 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lepskiy, A.: About Relation between the Measure of Conflict and Decreasing of Ignorance in Theory of Evidence. In: Proc. of the 8th Conf. of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, pp. 355–362. Atlantis Press, Amsterdam (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McConway, K.J.: Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76(374), 410–414 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sentz, K., Ferson, S.: Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory. Report SAND 2002-0835, Sandia National Laboratories (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smets, P.: The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model. IEEE Trans. PAMI 12, 447–458 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yager, R.: On the Dempster-Shafer Framework and New Combination Rules. Information Sciences 41, 93–137 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, L.: Representation, independence, and combination of evidence in the Dempster-Shafer theory. In: Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 51–69. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Lepskiy
    • 1
  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations