Advertisement

Sharing-Aware Scheduling of Web Services

  • Junyan Jiang
  • Zhiyong Peng
  • Xiaoying Wu
  • Nan Liang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8709)

Abstract

The increasing and widespread use of web services, usually represented by database queries, is putting a strain on web database systems behind them. In such systems web services are associated with soft-deadlines, and the success of these systems (i.e., the user satisfaction) is better measured in terms of minimizing the deviation from the deadline, that is, tardiness. Previous work on query scheduling focused on ordering the execution of independent queries while ignoring the commonality among queries, such that a same work will be computed multiple times which can impact user satisfaction negatively. This paper proposes a new query scheduling framework which incorporates semantic caching techniques into the query scheduling procedure. We develop a query splitting-based strategy to discover common sub-expressions among queries and design a sharing-aware query scheduling algorithm GASA which minimizes average tardiness while reducing redundant work at the same time. We experimentally compare our approach with state-of-the-art methods on TPC-H workloads. Our experimental results show that our method can efficiently and effectively minimize average tardiness of a large number of data service requests.

Keywords

web services query scheduling semantic caching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Unterbrunner, P.: Elastic, Reliable, and Robust Storage and Query Processing with Crescando /RB. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou, J., Larson, P.-A., Freytag, J.C., Lehner, W.: Efficient Exploitation of Similar Subexpression for Query Processing. In: Proc. SIGMOD 2007, pp. 533–544 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chidlovskii, B., Borghoff, U.M.: Semantic Caching of Web Queries. The VLDB Journal 9(1), 2–17 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guirguis, S., Sharaf, M.A., Chrysanthis, P.K., Labrinidis, A., Pruhs, K.: Adaptive scheduling of web transactions. In: Proc. ICDE, pp. 357–368 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ren, Q., Dunham, M.H., Kumar, V.: Semantic Caching and Query Processing. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(1), 192–210 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dar, S.,Franklin, M.J., Þór Jónsson, B., Srivastava, D., Tan, M. : Semantic Data Caching and Replacement. In Proc. VLDB 1996, pp.330–341(1996). Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brucker, P.: Scheduling algorithms, 5th edn. Springer (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ullman, J.D.: Np-complete scheduling problems. J. Computer. Syst. Sci. 10(3), 384–393 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peha, J.M.: Scheduling and dropping algorithms to support integrated services in packet-switched networks. PhD thesis, Stanford University (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haritsa, J.R., Carey, M.J., Livny, M.: Value-based scheduling in real-time database systems. In: Proc. VLDB 1993, pp. 117–152 (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Irwin, D.E., Grit, L.E., Chase, J.S.: Balancing Risk and Reward in a Market-Based Task Service. In: Proc. 13th IEEE Int’l Symp. High Performance Distributed Computing, pp. 160–169 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta, C., Mehta, A., Wang, S., Dayal, U.: Fair, effective, efficient and differentiated scheduling in an enterprise data warehouse. In: Proc. EDBT (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    He, Y., Elnikety, S., Larus, J., Yan, C.: Zeta: Scheduling interactive services with partial execution. In: Proc. SOCC 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, W., Chi, Y., Zhu, S., Tatemura, J., Hakan, H., Naughton, J.F.: Predicting Query Execution Time:Are Optimizer Cost Models Really Unusable? In: Proc. ICDE 2013, pp. 1081–1092 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malic, T., Rurns, R., Chawla, N.: A Black-Box Approach to Query Cardinality Estimation. In: Proc. CIDR 2007, pp. 56–67 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schroeder, B., Harchol-Balter, M.: Web servers under overload: How scheduling can help. ACM Trans. Inter. Tech. 6(1), 20–52 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junyan Jiang
    • 1
  • Zhiyong Peng
    • 1
  • Xiaoying Wu
    • 2
  • Nan Liang
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer SchoolWuhan UniversityChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Software EngineeringWuhan UniversityChina

Personalised recommendations