Skip to main content

Lessons for European Autonomy in Space from Past Pursuits of Energy Autonomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Space Policy ((STUDSPACE,volume 10))

Abstract

To what extent is autonomy achievable in space policy and for that matter what can autonomy mean in an age of globalization? Decades of experience and billions worth of investments by both Europe and the USA in the energy domain provide some valuable insights to these questions. Perhaps, the most important among them is that while autonomy is ideally achievable, it also is expensive, politically risky, and hardly guaranteed. Should the EU pursue autonomy in space or should it rather seek increased degrees of interdependence? While there are manifest benefits in choosing the former, such as uninhibited access to earth orbits and enhanced and independent sources of communication, the costs associated with such a path may be prohibitive. Indeed, one must ask whether the gains outweigh the costs of investment or for that matter whether the EU can collectively afford it in the first place. If instead Europe chooses to seek enhanced interdependence, with which countries should it cooperate and how will it address the resulting vulnerabilities that may inhibit and even thwart progress? This chapter examines some of the lessons we can learn from states’ pursuit of energy autonomy and how those lessons can be applied to better understand the risks and opportunities for Europe’s decisions about its space program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wouters and Hansen (Chap. 2) cite Carpenter’s (1995) definition of strategic independence as “the capacity to take strategic decisions and to execute them so as to safeguard a number of vital interests”; see further Ted G. Carpenter, “Toward Strategic Independence: Protecting Vital American Interest”, Brown Journal of World Affairs II.2 (1995). pp 7–14.

  2. 2.

    See Allen V. Kneese and James L. Sweeney, Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Handbooks in Economics (New York: Elsevier Science, 1985).

  3. 3.

    L. C. Gray, “Rent under the Assumption of Exhaustibility”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 28.3 (1914)

  4. 4.

    Harold Hotelling, “The Economics of Exhaustible Resources”, The Journal of Political Economy 39.2 (1931)

  5. 5.

    See P. Dasgupta and G. Heal, “The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources”, The Review of Economic Studies 41 (1974).

  6. 6.

    On growth, see J. Stiglitz, “Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths”, The Review of Economic Studies 41 (1974). On innovation, see P. Dasgupta, R. J. Gilbert, and J. E. Stiglitz, “Invention and Innovation under Alternative Market Structures: The Case of Natural Resources”, The Review of Economic Studies 49.4 (1982).

  7. 7.

    See D. R. Bohi, M. A. Toman, and M. A. Walls, The Economics of Energy Security (Springer, 1996); D. Yergin “Ensuring Energy Security”, Foreign Affairs (2006); and D. A. Deese, and J. S. Nye, “Energy and Security”, Harvard Mag 83.3 (1981).

  8. 8.

    See James M. Griffin and Henry Steele, Energy Economics and Policy, 2nd ed. (Orlando: Academic Press College Division, 1986), Dieter Helm, “The Assessment: The New Energy Paradigm”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 21.1 (2005).

  9. 9.

    For a quantitative examination of foreign dependency on oil and states’ vulnerability to disruption, see E. Gupta, “Oil Vulnerability Index of Oil-Importing Countries”, Energy Policy 36.3 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Evan Bayh, “Strategic Petroleum Reserve Hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, First Session … May 12, 2009”, United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy, Natural Resources, S. hrg.; 111-67 (Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O., 2009)

  11. 11.

    In this context, hard power assets primarily refer to military resources.

  12. 12.

    See Samuel R. Schubert “Internal substitution policies and external power projection: how the pursuit of energy autonomy affects international cooperation and conflict. An examination of the United States and the European Union”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Vienna (2010).

  13. 13.

    Alexander L. George and Robert Koehane, “The Concept of National Interests: Uses and Limitations”, Presidential Decisionmaking in Foreign Policy : The Effective Use of Information and Advice, ed. Alexander L. George (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1980)

  14. 14.

    Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge Studies in International Relations 67 (Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999)

  15. 15.

    Many other countries have space programs including Iran and Israel; both of which have developed independent launch capabilities. For a summary of various national and private space programs, see Cenan Al-Ekabi, “Space Policies, Issues and Trends in 2011/2012, ESPI Report 42” (Vienna: ESPI, 2012).

  16. 16.

    Stephen Padgett, “The Single European Energy Market: The Politics of Realization” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 30.1 (1992): 53

  17. 17.

    Richard G. Hewlett and Francis Duncan, Nuclear Navy, 1946-1962 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974)

  18. 18.

    Deborah D. Stine, The Manhattan Project, the Apollo Program, and Federal Energy Technology R&D Programs: A Comparative Analysis (Rl34645) (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2008)

  19. 19.

    The one exception was geologist Harrison Schmitt (Apollo 17, December 11–14, 1972).

  20. 20.

    The House “Science and Astronautics Committee” established in 1958 was the first committee with a new area of jurisdiction created since 1892. Its name has changed several times since then and even took on energy as a portfolio in 1974. It is now known as the “The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. For a complete history of the Committee, see US House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, A History of the Committee on Science and Technology, 85th-110th Congresses 1958–2008 (House Committee Print) (Washington, DC: GPO, 2008).

  21. 21.

    It may be that the explanatory power of the military as a customer is specific to the USA. Certainly, the European Agricultural Policy, which aimed at the goal of providing the essential food to all Europeans at affordable prices, had the civilian population as its primary customer, and it succeeded in its mission by the 1990s.

  22. 22.

    Barack H. Obama, “Remarks on Energy at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, March 31, 2010. http://Www.Presidency.Ucsb.Edu/Ws/Index.Php?Pid=87685&St=&St1=”, The American Presidency Project [Online]. eds. John T. Woolley and Gerhard Peters (Santa Barbara: University of Southern California, Santa Barbara, 2010)

  23. 23.

    United States. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report, February 2010 (Washington D.C.: US Department of Defense, 2010) 87-88

  24. 24.

    Obama, “Remarks on Energy at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, March 31, 2010 http://Www.Presidency.Ucsb.Edu/Ws/Index.Php?Pid=87685&St=&St1=

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel R. Schubert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schubert, S.R. (2015). Lessons for European Autonomy in Space from Past Pursuits of Energy Autonomy. In: Al-Ekabi, C. (eds) European Autonomy in Space. Studies in Space Policy, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11110-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11110-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11109-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11110-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics