Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 355))

Abstract

Cloud computing is a technology which is considered to be very promising and beneficial in the countries of the European Union. However, its implementation in business is not currently that noticeable, and many companies do not manage to assess and voice its contribution. The introduction of cloud computing not only brings significant benefits but also costs and risks. The aim of this contribution is therefore to propose a topical system of criteria for assessing the effectiveness of cloud computing, which is based on the existing experience with this particular technology. Several methods are used in order to achieve this goal, namely, bibliographic search, interviews with cloud computing experts on the implementation and design of cloud computing, and a questionnaire survey among enterprises in the selected country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Armburst M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph A.D, Katz RH, Konwinski A et al. Above the clouds: a Berkeley view of cloud computing. 2009. http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2009/EECS-2009-28.html.

  2. Forrester, Reichman R, Chi E. File storage costs less in the cloud than in-house. 2011. http://www.forrester.com/File+Storage+Costs+Less+In+The+Cloud+Than+InHouse/fulltext/-/E-162RES36696?objectid¥RES57696.

  3. Accenture. Accenture cloud computing accelerator. 2009. http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture_Technology_Labs_Cloud_Computing_Accelerator.pdf.

  4. Boruff B. Computer sciences corporation. Doing business in the cloud. 2009. http://assets1.csc.com/dk/downloads/DoingBusinessInTheCloud.pdf.

  5. Hosseini AK, Greenwood D, Sommerville I. Cloud migration: a case study of migrating an enterprise IT system to IaaS. In: 3rd international conference on cloud computing (IEEE CLOUD 2010). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society; 2010. pp. 450–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sriram I, Hosseini AK. Research agenda in cloud technologies. Technical Report. 2010. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1001/1001.3259.pdf.

  7. Assuncao M, Costanzo A, Buyya R. Evaluating the cost-benefit of using cloud computing to extend the capacity of clusters. In: 18th ACM international symposium on high performance distributed computing (HPDC ‘09), Munich. 2009. pp. 141–50.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calheiros RN, Ranjan R, Beloglazov A, Rose CAFD, Buyya R. CloudSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Software Pract Exper. 2011;41(1):23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deelman E, Singh G, Livny A, Berriman B, Good J. The cost of doing science on the cloud: the Montage example. In: ACM/IEEE conference on supercomputing (SC’08), Oregon, USA. 2008. pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kondo D, Javadi B, Malecot P, Cappello F, Anderson DP. Cost-benefit analysis of Cloud Computing versus desktop grids. In: IEEE XPLORE international symposium on parallel & distributed processing. IEEE Xplore; 2009. pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walker E. The real cost of a CPU hour. Computer. 2009;42(4):35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker E, Brisken W, Romney J. To lease or not to lease from storage clouds. Computer. 2010;43:44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pilevari N, Eshlaghy AT, Sanaei M. A framework for evaluating cloud computing user’s satisfaction in information technology management. Int J Manage Bus Res. 2011;1(4):231–40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Allan R. Cloud and Web 2.0 resources for supporting research. 2012. http://tyne.dl.ac.uk/NWGrid/Clouds/.

  15. Pepitone J. Amazon EC2 outage downs Reddit, Quora. CNN. 2011. http://money.cnn.com/2011/04/21/technology/amazon_server_outage/index.htm.

  16. Alhamad M, Dillon T, Chang E. Trust-evaluation metric for cloud applications. Int J Mach Learn Comput. 2011;1(4):416–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aumueller D. IT-compliance analysis for cloud computing, M.Sc. dissertation, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt. 2010. http://germany.emc.com/collateral/about/news/emc-publications/articles/it-compliance-analysis-for-cloud-computing-dirk-aumueller.pdf.

  18. Chen D, Zhao H. Data security and privacy protection issues in cloud computing. In: International conference on computer science and electronics engineering. IEEE Xplore; 2012. pp. 647– 51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chowhan S, Saxena R. Customer relationship management from the business strategy perspective with the application of cloud computing. The Proceedings of DYNAA. 2011;2(1):28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xue J, Zhang J-J. A brief survey on the security model of cloud computing. In: Ninth international symposium on distributed computing and applications to business, engineering and science. IEEE; 2010. pp. 475–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Khazaei H, Mi J, Mi VB. Performance analysis of cloud computing centers. In: Proceedings of the seventh international ICST conference on heterogeneous networking for quality, reliability, security and robustness (QShine). 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xiong K, Perros H. Service performance and analysis in cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE world conference services, IEEE Xplore. 2009. pp. 693–700.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yang B, Tan F, Dai Y, Guo S. Performance evaluation of cloud service considering fault recovery. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on cloud computing. Berlin: Springer; 2009. pp. 571–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abbadi M. Self-managed services conceptual model in trustworthy clouds’ infrastructure. workshop on cryptography and security in clouds. 2011. http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~cca/csc2011/submissions/abbadi.pdf.

  25. Ristola J. Information technology service management for cloud computing. M.Sc. dissertation, Aalto University School of Science and Technology. 2010. http://lib.tkk.fi/Dipl/2010/urn100243.pdf.

  26. Ness LR. Assessing the relationships among information technology flexibility, strategic alignment, and information technology effectiveness. J Inf Technol Manage Assoc Manage. 2005;16(2):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Costa P, Lourenço JC, Silva M. Evaluating cloud services using a multiple criteria decision analysis approach. In: 11th international conference on service-oriented computing, ICSOC 2013, Berlin, Germany. Berlin: Springer; 2013. pp. 456–64.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tallon PP, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V. Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. J Manage Inf Syst. 2000;16(4):145–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Albrecht JP. Draft Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individual with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). J. a. H. A. Committee on Civil Liberties (ed.). 2012. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FTEXT%2BREPORT%2BA7-2013-0402%2B0%2BDOC%2BXML%2BV0%2F%2FEN&language=EN.

  30. Bauer E, Adams R. Reliability and availability of cloud computing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press; 2012. p. 352.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, et al. A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM. 2010;53(4):50–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco IOS IP SLAs configuration guide. 2008. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4/ip_sla/configuration/guide/hsla_c.html.

  33. Chen ChT, Hung WZ, Lin KH, Cheng HL. An evaluation model of service quality by applying linguistic TOPSIS method. In: IEEE/INFORMS international conference on service operations, logistics and informatics. IEEE Xplore; 2009. pp. 335, 340.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Service Level Agreement Zone (DT): an outline of the core elements of an SLA. 2014. http://www.sla-zone.co.uk/

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is published thanks to the support of the internal projects of the University of Hradec Kralove: Economic and Managerial Aspects of Processes in Bio-medicine and specific university research (MSMT no. 2111/2014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Marešová .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marešová, P., Kuča, K. (2015). Assessing the Effectiveness of Cloud Computing in European Countries. In: Wong, W. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11104-9_89

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11104-9_89

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11103-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11104-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics