Skip to main content

The Key Role of Sincerity in Restoring Trust in a Brand with a Corporate Apology

  • Conference paper
Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same…

Abstract

How should a firm respond in situations where consumer trust has been shattered? Corporate apologies are a common response, but there is uncertainty regarding this being the best approach. Prior research has compared apology to alternative corporate response strategies without fully considering the elements that constitute an effective apology. We apply insights from the inter-personal relationships literature to an experimental examination of a corporate apology issued following a guilty plea to charges of misleading advertising. Structural equation modeling shows that perceived sincerity of the apology statement plays a central role in enhancing assessments of reputation and trust in the brand, minimizing brand damage. Excusatory statements and high stability both detract from sincerity, but corrective action reinforces it. Our findings provide important guidance for restoring reputation and regaining consumer trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahluwalia, Rohini, Robert E. Burnkrant, and H. Rao Unnava (2000), "Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment," Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 203–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.C. and D.W. Gerbing (1988), "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach," Psychological Bulletin, 103,411–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, Arjun. and Morris. B. Holbrook (2001), "The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty," Journal of Marketing, 65 (2), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleeren, Kathleen, Marnik G Dekimpe, and Kristiaan Helsen (2008), "Weathering Product-Harm Crises," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 262–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, PR, L Ashworth, and RJB Ritchie (2008), "Damage from Corrective Advertising: Causes and Cures," J. Marketing, 72 (6), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs-Burnett, Taryn. (2002), "Mass Public Corporate Apology," Dispute Resolution Journal, 57 (3), 26–32. Johar, Gita V., Matthias M.Birk, and Sabine A Einwiller (2010), "How to Save Your Brand in the Face of Crisis," MIT Sloan Management Review, 51 (4), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johar, Gita V., Matthias M.Birk, and Sabine A Einwiller (2010), "How to Save Your Brand in the Face of Crisis," MIT Sloan Management Review, 51 (4), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Jill, and Niraj. Dawar (2004), "Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers’ Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product-Harm Crisis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Jing, Niraj Dawar, and Jos Lemmink (2008), "Negative Spillover inBrandPortfolios:Exploring the Antecedents of Asymmetric Effects," Journal of Marketing, 72 (May), 111–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, Maurice. E., John. C. Hershey, and Eric. T. Bradlow (2006), "Promises and Lies: Restoring Violated Trust," Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 101,1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twomey, Katherine L, John G Knight, and Lisa S McNeill (2011), "Damage Control: Limiting the Fall-out from Deceptive Advertising," J. Advertising Res., 51 (2), 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, Michael A, Shailendra P Jain, Saurabh Mishra, and Charles Lindsey (2010), "Stock Market Response to Regulatory Reports of Deceptive Advertising: The Moderating Effect of Omission Bias and Firm Reputation," Marketing Sci., 29 (5), 828–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Knight, J.G., Mather, D., Mathieson, B. (2015). The Key Role of Sincerity in Restoring Trust in a Brand with a Corporate Apology. In: Robinson, L. (eds) Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same…. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10912-1_64

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics