Advertisement

Cognitive Modeling for Automating Learning in Visually-Guided Manipulative Tasks

  • Hendry Ferreira ChameEmail author
  • Philippe Martinet
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 325)

Abstract

Robot manipulators, as general-purpose machines, can be used to perform various tasks. Though, adaptations to specific scenarios require of some technical efforts. In particular, the descriptions of the task result in a robot program which must be modified whenever changes are introduced. Another source of variations are undesired changes due to the entropic properties of systems; in effect, robots must be re-calibrated with certain frequency to produce the desired results. To ensure adaptability, cognitive robotists aim to design systems capable of learning and decision making. Moreover, control techniques such as visual-servoing allow robust control under inaccuracies in the estimates of the system’s parameters. This paper reports the design of a platform called CRR, which combines the computational cognition paradigm for decision making and learning, with the visual-servoing control technique for the automation of manipulative tasks.

Keywords

Cognitive robotics Computational cognition Artificial intelligence Visual servoing. 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was accomplished thanks to the founding of the National Agency of Research through the EQUIPEX ROBOTEX project (ANR-10-EQX-44), of the European Union through the FEDER ROBOTEX project 2011-2015, and of the Ecole Centrale of Nantes.

References

  1. 1.
    Arbib, M.A., Metta, G., van der Smagt, P.P.: Neurorobotics: from vision to action. In: Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1453–1480 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Newell, A.: Unified Theories of Cognition. William James Lectures, Harvard University Press (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duch, W., Oentaryo, R.J., Pasquier, M.: Cognitive architectures: where do we go from here? In: Proceedings of the IROS workshop on current software frameworks in cognitive robotics integrating different computational paradigms, pp. 122–136, Nice, France 22 Sept 2008Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun, R.: Multi-agent Systems for Society. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanford, S., Long, L.: A cognitive robotic system based on the Soar cognitive architecture for mobile robot navigation, search, and mapping missions. In: PhD thesis, Aerospace Engineering, University Park, Pa, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huelse, M., Hild, M.: A brief introduction to current software frameworks in cognitive robotics integrating different computational paradigms. In: Proceedings of the IROS workshop on current software frameworks in cognitive robotics integrating different computational paradigms. Nice, France, 22 Sept 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corke, P.I.: Robotics, Vision & Control: Fundamental Algorithms in Matlab. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaumette, F., Hutchinson, S.: Visual servo control, part I: basic approaches. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 13, 82–90 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelley, T.D.: Symbolic and sub-symbolic representations in computational models of human cognition: what can be learned from biology? Theor. Psychol. 13(6), 847–860 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Reilly, R., Munakata, Y.: Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain. Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khalil, W., Creusot, D.: Symoro+: a system for the symbolic modelling of robots. Robotica 15(2), 153–161 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pratt, W.: Digital Image Processing: PIKS Scientific Inside. Wiley-Interscience publication, Wiley (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marchand, E., Chaumette, F., Rizzo, A.: Using the task function approach to avoid robot joint limits and kinematic singularities in visual servoing. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS’96. vol. 3, Osaka, Japan, pp. 1083–1090 (Nov 1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaelbling, L., Littman, M., Moore, A.: Reinforcement learning: a survey. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 4, 237–285 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robotics TeamInstitut de Recherche en Communications et Cybernétique de Nantes (IRCCyN)NantesFrance

Personalised recommendations