Pinpointing Sentence-Level Subjectivity through Balanced Subjective and Objective Features

  • Munhyong Kim
  • Hyopil Shin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8686)

Abstract

The sentence-level subjectivity classification is a challenging task. This paper pinpoints some of its unique characteristics. It argues that these characteristics should be considered when extracting subjective or objective features from sentences. Through various sentence-level subjectivity classification experiments with numerous feature combinations, we found that balanced features for both subjective and objective sentences help to achieve balanced precision and recall for sentence subjectivity classification.

Keywords

sentence-level subjectivity analysis subjective and objective features balanced features 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Banfield, A.: Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction, p. 256. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston (1982)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruce, R., Wiebe, J.: Recognizingsubjectivity: A case study in manual tagging. Natural Language Engineering 5(2) (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support vector machine. Machine Learning 20(3), 273–297 (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fan, R.E., Chang, K.W., Hsieh, C.J., Wang, X.R., Lin, C.J.: LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 1871–1874 (2008)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hatzivassiloglou, V., Wiebe, J.: Effectsof adjective orientation and gradability on sentencesubjectivity. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 299–305. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jang, H., Kim, M., Shin, H.: KOSAC: A Full-fledged Korean Sentiment Analysis Corpus. In: Proceedings of the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In: Handbook of Natural Language Processing, vol. 2, pp. 627–666 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., et al.: Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830 (2011)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J.: A ComprehensiveGrammar of the English Language. Longman, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shin, H., Kim, M., Jo, Y.M., Jang, H., Cattle, A.: Annotation Scheme for Constructing Sentiment Corpus in Korean. In: Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp. 181–190 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wiebe, J.M., Bruce, R.F., O’Hara, T.P.: Development and use of a gold standard dataset for subjectivity classifications. In: Proceedings ofthe 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics, pp. 246–253 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiebe, J., Riloff, E.: Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2005. LNCS, vol. 3406, pp. 486–497. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Cardie, C.: Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2-3), 165–210 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilson, T.A.: Fine-grained Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis: Recognizing the intensity, polarity and attitudes of private states. Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. of Pittsburgh (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu, H., Hatzivassiloglou, V.: Towards answering opinion questions: separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 129–136. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Munhyong Kim
    • 1
  • Hyopil Shin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsSeoul National UniversityKorea

Personalised recommendations