Abstract
This paper investigates the main perceptual biases developed by consumers regarding the environmental impact of products. It shows that these biases make consumers unable to distinguish between advertisements for highly versus less sustainable products, but that the inclusion of relevant information can increase the efficiency of arguments for true sustainability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ellen, P. (1994). Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 30, 43–52.
Fischhoff, B., Morgan M.G., Bostrom A., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 14, 959–970.
Freling, T. H., & Dacin, P.A. (2010). When consensus counts: Exploring the impact of consensus claims in advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 163–175.
Fuller, D.A. (1999). Sustainable marketing: managerial-ecological issues, Sage Publications.
Glazer, R. (1984). Multiattribute Perceptual Bias as Revealing of Preference Structure, Journal of Consumer research, 11, 510–521.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations, New York:Wiley.
Henion, K.E. (1972). The Effect of Ecologically Relevant Information on Detergent Sales, Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 10–14.
Karniouchina, E.V., Moore, W.L., & Cooney, K.J. (2009). Impact of mad money stock recommendations: merging financial and marketing perspectives. Journal of Marketing, 73, 244–266.
Kolandai-Matchett, K. (2009). Mediated communication of ‘sustainable consumption’ in the alternative media: a case study exploring a message framing strategy, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 113–125.
Mason, K., Jensen T., Burton S., & Roach, D. (2001). The accuracy of brand and attribute judgments: The role of information relevancy, product experience, and attribute-relationship schemata. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 307–317.
Montoro-Rios, F., Luque-MartÍnez, T. & Rodriguez-Molina, M.A. (2008). How Green Should You Be: Can Environmental Associations Enhance Brand Performance? Journal of Advertising Research, 48, 547–563.
Němeček, P. & Kocmanová A. (2007). Integration of life cycle as a business approach. Economics & Management, 12, 521–526.
Oates, C, McDonald, S., Alevizou, P., Hwang, K., Young, W., & McMorland LA. (2008). Marketing sustainability: Use of information sources and degrees of voluntary simplicity. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14, 351–365.
Peattie, K. & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8, 357–370.
Reinhard, J. and Zah, R. (2009). Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessment, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, S46–S56.
Vlachos, PA., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos,A.P., & Avramidis P.K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 170–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bascoul, G., Schmitt, J., Rasolofoarison, D. (2015). Consumers’ Biased Perceptions of the Environmental Impact of Products, and Their Influence on Advertising Efficiency. In: Dato-on, M. (eds) The Sustainable Global Marketplace. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10873-5_243
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10873-5_243
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10872-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10873-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)