Abstract
The paper describes the way expertise and field-knowledge can impact the transfer of graphical intentions during architectural cooperative design. The analysis of 28 controlled experiments reveals what matters in transmitting architectural intents and more specifically underlines how novices’ intuitive, deductive processes based on previous and embodied experiences interestingly complement experts’ knowledge of the architectural field and its semantics. The results directly inform how we, as researchers, designers and engineers, should take advantage of both novices’ and experts’ strategies to develop tools, methods or interfaces to support next generation cooperative design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Schön, D.A., Wiggins, G.: Kinds of Seeing and their Functions in Designing. Design Studies 13(2), 135–156 (1992)
Dogan, F., Nersessian, N.J.: Generic abstraction in design creativity: the case of Staatsgalerie by James Stirling. Design Studies 31, 207–236 (2010)
Dorta, T., Kalay, Y., Pérez, E., Lesage, A.-M.: Comparing immersion in remote and local collaborative ideation through sketches: a case study. In: CAAD Futures, Proceedings (2011)
Elsen, C., Demaret, J.-N., Yang, M.-C., Leclercq, P.: Sketch-Based Interfaces for Modeling and Users’ Needs: Redefining Connections. AIEDAM 26(3) (2012)
Jones, J.C.: Design methods: Seeds of human futures. John Wiley, Chichester (1970)
Norman, D.A., Verganti, R.: Incremental and radical innovation: design research versus technology and meaning change. Submitted to Design Issues (2012)
Baker, M., Détienne, F., Burkhardt, J.-M.: Quality of collaboration in design: articulating multiple dimensions and viewpoints. In: 1st Interdisciplinary Innovation Conference, Telecom ParisTech. (2013)
Darses, F.: Résolution collective des problèmes de conception. Le Travail Humain 72, 43–59 (2009)
Safin, S., Juchmes, R., Leclercq, P.: Use of graphical modality in a collaborative design distant setting. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation (suppl.1) (2012)
Elsen, C., Darses, F., Leclercq, P.: What Do Strokes Teach Us about Collaborative Design? In: Luo, Y. (ed.) CDVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7467, pp. 114–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Dessy, J.: De l’emploi des symboles dans les esquisses architecturales. Thesis, Université de Liège (2002)
Van Someren, M., Barnard, Y., Sandberg, J.: The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. Academic Press, London (1994)
Kavakli, M., Gero, J.S.: The Structure of Concurrent Cognitive Actions: a Case Study on Novice and Expert Designers. Design Studies 23(1), 25–40 (2001)
Hattenhauer, D.: The Rhetoric of Architecture: a Semiotic Approach. Communication Quarterly 32, 71–77 (1984)
Eco, U.: Function and Sign: the Semiotics of Architecture. In: Signs, Symbols and Architecture, pp. 11–69 (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sutera, J., Yang, M.C., Elsen, C. (2014). The Impact of Expertise on the Capture of Sketched Intentions: Perspectives for Remote Cooperative Design. In: Luo, Y. (eds) Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. CDVE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8683. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10831-5_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10831-5_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10830-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10831-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)