Advertisement

Impact of 3D Shock Control Bumps on Transonic Buffet

  • S. Bogdanski
  • P. Gansel
  • T. LutzEmail author
  • E. Krämer
Conference paper

Abstract

Steady and unsteady RANS computations have been carried out to investigate the effect of three dimensional shock control bumps on the buffet behaviour of a transonic airfoil. A total of five basic bump shapes were investigated at two Mach numbers. All bumps were optimized for minimal drag at a single design point by varying the two parameters bump height and bump position. In total two design points were investigated. The first one was located at the higher Mach number at a angle of attack close to cruise conditions while the second design point was located at the lower Mach number close to the buffet boundary. Additionally, the applicability of separation as buffet indicator, the effect of streamwise vortices on the buffet alleviation and innovative bump shapes were examined. For a suitable test case the employed finite volume solver TAU shows a close-to-linear scaling up to high domain numbers beyond 10,000, which corresponds to less than 14,000 cells per partition. Additionally the differences achieved utilizing different compilers and partitioners are discussed.

Keywords

Mach Number Lift Coefficient Streamwise Vortex Streamwise Vorticity Maximum Lift Coefficient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) for the Clean Sky Joint Technology Initiative under grant agreement no. 271843.

References

  1. 1.
    Pätzold, M.: Auslegungsstudien von 3-D Shock-Control-Bumps mittels numerischer Optimierung (Design of 3D shock control bumps by numerical optimisation), PhD Thesis, Institute for Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, University of Stuttgart (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corre, C., et al.: Transonic flow control using a NS-solver and a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Fluid Mech. Appl., 73, 297–302 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eastwood, J.P., Jarrett, J.P.: Towards designing with three-dimensional bumps for lift/drag improvement and buffet alleviation. AIAA J. 50(12), 2882–2898 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Streit, T., Horstmann, K.-H., Schrauf, G., Hein, S., Fey, U., Egami, Y., Perraud, J., El Din, I., Cella, U., Quest, J.: Complementary numerical and experimental data analysis of the ETW Telfona Pathfinder wing transition tests. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, AIAA Paper 2011-881 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerhold, T.: Overview of the Hybrid RANS Code TAU. In: Kroll, N., Fassbender, J.K. (eds.) MEGAFLOW – Numerical Flow Simulation for Aircraft Design. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol. 89, pp. 81–92. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Menter, F., Egorov, Y.: A Scale-Adaptive Simulation Model using Two-Equation Models. AIAA 2005-1095 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soda, A.: Numerical Investigation of unsteady transonic shock/boundary-layer interaction for aeronautical applications. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pearcey, H., Osborne, J.: The Interaction Between Local Effects at the Shock and Rear Separation – A Source of Significant Scale Effects in Wind-Tunnel Tests on Airfoils and Wings. AGARD, CP35 (1968)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.R.: A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows (1992). AIAA 92-0439Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gansel, P.P., et al.: Unsteady CFD simulation of the NASA common research model in low speed stall. In: High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’13, pp. 439–453. Springer, Cham (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hendrickson, B., Leland, R.: The chaco user’s guide, version 2.0. Technical Report SAND94-2692, Sandia National Laboratories (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas DynamicsUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations